Wow.  No guns, no Jews, and an unlimited suckle off the state’s plump entitlement teat.  Now all that’s left to do is name Kim Jong Il ruler for life, and International ANSWER will finally have its paradise on earth… **** update

Josiah “Jed” Bartlet RU-486 A nice glass of gingerale, not too cold One box Trojan® Shared Pleasure™ condoms with Warm Sensations™ Somebody “vaguely Canadian-sounding” One-a-Day Prostate Health Multi-Vitamins (w/ Lycopene) A plate of herring (in cream sauce, w/ onion) (T) Margaret Cho / one of Nancy Pelosi’s cardinal red power suits “Queen whatsherface—y’know, the Black one from that Richard Gere movie.” **** related, in that ‘distant cousin you accidentally made

BECAUSE OF THE HYPOCRISY!*

Even though it was quite inflamed—and even though I kept poking at it with the uncoiled tip of a paperclip—I guess I never really expected it to pop like that.  At least, not with such magnificent force.

Well, add Ann Coulter to the list of conservatives less than thrilled with the nomination of John Roberts to the Supreme Court.  From “Souter in Roberts Clothing”: After pretending to consider various women and minorities for the Supreme Court these past few weeks, President Bush decided to disappoint all the groups he had just ginned up and nominate a white male. […] But unfortunately, other than that that, we don’t

From FOXNews: A Pakistani intelligence official said Wednesday that authorities had arrested an “important” suspect in the London bombings, while police in London removed a shattered carriage from a subway station, signaling a shift in the investigation’s underground forensic work. “We have an important man in our custody,” a senior Pakistani intelligence official told The Associated Press. “I am not in a position to disclose his name right now, but

The smart money is on Edith Brown Clement.* Let the games begin! **** update: another guess. **** update:  John Roberts will be the President’s nominee.  Expect a bit of a battle.  more:  Jonathan Adler calls Roberts “close to the Platonic ideal of what a Supreme Court nominee should be” (via IP).  Harry Reid is not quite so sanguine.  And the National Journal had this to say of Roberts:  “John Roberts