From FOXNews: Already saddled with resolving a looming nuclear showdown with Iran, the Bush administration now faces the possibility that that country’s new leader helped take 52 Americans hostage in 1979. “Many questions” have been raised by five former U.S. hostages who have identified Iran’s President-elect Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as one of their captors more than 25 years ago, President Bush said Thursday “I have no information,” Bush said in an
June 2005
Literary revisionism, 2: “If instead of a brooding existentialist, Albert Camus were a libertarian” (from the protein wisdom conceptual series)
“[…] At which point Sisyphus, weary of the burden imposed on him by a centralized, elitist pantheon of self-styled ‘Gods,’ changed his fate by finding a willing masochist to assume his unending task—spreading happiness on two fronts and signalling a victory for the free market over the tyranny of an artificial ‘fate’ henceforth shown to be illusory.” — from “The Myth of Sisyphus”
Creating new terrorists: Chimpy McHitlerburton’s smirky rodeo ride through history continues, #14
From DefenseLINK News: It all started as Chief Warrant Officer James Gisclair was giving an orientation flight to a pilot new to the area. He and the new pilot, Chief Warrant Officer Nathan Scott, spotted a flash flood occurring after heavy rains hit the area earlier that day. They noticed a group of people standing alongside the banks of a flooding river, pointing toward the middle as they followed its
a CITIZEN JOURNALIST continues to look into the Natalee Holloway case and to offer theories on her disappearance that could, perhaps, prove fruitful, were the Aruban government to follow-up on them—and were Greta Van Susteren to take up the mantle and really really dig into their potentialities
Uh, alien abduction, maybe…?
In which I attempt to curry favor with Canadians by carefully caressing their cultural sensibilities, 4
Baseball is for pussies. Now hockey—that’s a man‘s sport…! **** cross-posted at kate’s
Revenge of the Chickenhawks
One of the silliest arguments confronting pro-war supporters is the infantile “chickenhawk” accusation frequently floated by those swimming in the shallow end of the anti-war pool—the idea being, in theory, that if you aren’t a member of the military, you aren’t entitled to express a public opinion on the Iraqi war.¹ Of course, in practice, non-military personnel such as those who are quick to use the chickenhawk argument are themselves
Literary revisionism, 1: “If Samuel Beckett were an existential optimist” (from the protein wisdom conceptual series)
Vladimir: “Look, here comes Godot now!” Estragon: “Yup. Right on time, too! And the magnificent bastard even brought a twelve pack…!”
Random Cat Blogger thought, Wednesday, June 29, 1:17 PM MST
…I sure will miss you, pal. And if there is indeed a Kitty Heaven, I’m sure you’re up there right now—cranked on ‘nip with your teeth sunk deep into some presumptuous rodent who never even saw you coming…*
Appendix to the Bush Iraq Speech: Department of Defense Press Briefing, June 27
Something I found lacking in the President’s speech last evening was a sustained and pointed rebuke to the ascendent MSM narrative of Operation Iraqi Freedom—a narrative that is augmented by incessant and hyperbolic Gitmo criticisms, the partisan ravings of Ted Kennedy, et al, and by a contemporary media ethos that priviliges the sensational at the expense of the balanced—and one that is directly responsible for whatever war anxieties have been
A brief critique of President Bush’s televised speech on Iraq (bulleted, in case Sean Hannity happens by)
Pros: clearly articulated an “exit strategy,” namely, that US troops will leave Iraq once the goal of Iraqi self-sufficiency is realized offered a realistic assessment of the facts on the ground, noting uneven progress in rebuilding of the Iraq infrastructure –while all the time maintaining the inevitability of a US victory effectively delineated his two track strategic approach to completing the mission: 1) killing and/or capturing terrorists, and 2) making
