Regarding the CBS document scandal, (former?) reader Walter Sobchak writes: I think, Jeff, what you’re missing in this whole discussion is the possibility that CBS actually believed the documents were genuine, even if it turns out that they were forgeries. I know, I know, the liberal media hate Bush and want to make sure he doesn’t get re-elected blah blah blah, but even so, does it seem particularly likely that
September 12, 2004
Coincidence? Or something more sinister…?
If you rearrange the letters in “CBS documents likely forged; Dan Rather holds fast to brazen denials,” you’ll come up with “Bill Burkett digs Dan Rather” (plus a mess of extra letters I suspect were meant to throw us off the scent). Not a scientifically conclusive revelation, perhaps, but hey—Dan woulda run with it… **** update: “CBS’s Giant Eyeball emerges from his tony New York lair, sees own shadow. Several
Rathergate Redux: “OER” vs. “OETR,” continued
Responding to my question about the odd acronym “OETR” in this memo (see updates 3 and 5), reader Seth Williams emails: Jeff, To the best of my knowledge it isn’t a question of which acronym (OETR/OER) is current; both acronyms are in current use. An OER is a report used for various things, among them evaluating promotions. It’s also interesting to note that it’s not exclusively an Air Force acronym;
Fed up with unsightly Old Media bulges?
Contact the the ombudsman for the Boston Globe and help trim the fat! Christine Chinlund 617-929-3020 / 3022
