Stanley Kurtz’s deranged unhelpfulness in full bloom. You know, I can remember when Kurtz was a thoughtful and articulate critic of our friends the Democrats’ well-intentioned (though politically misguided) policies. But I guess there’s simply more profit to be made writing rhetorical stinkbombs that — though perhaps based in fact (personally, I remain convinced that facts that make us look kooky are best left unremarked upon) — are nonetheless not
April 2011
"Laurence Kotlikoff: Fiscal Meltdown in Spitting Distance"
The CBO knows this. Congress knows this. The President knows this. So ask yourselves: why, if they all know this, is nothing of substance being done to stop it? On the right, the answer is simple: we’re being led by a spray-painted coward and his carefully appointed lackeys in leadership. But on the left? What’s the end game? I have an idea what the answer is. And it doesn’t involve
A classical liberal coda: Some of those unreported "pockets" are coming in from the WI elections…
…and unsurprisingly, Kloppenburg has overcome her 800 vote deficit! Supreme Court REPORTING 99% Joanne Kloppenburg 738,368 50% David Prosser (inc) 738,228 50% Why, it’s a miracle! Sorry, Congressman Ryan. And sorry, conservatives / classical liberals. America has reached that tipping point about which Ryan yesterday spoke. And the majority has chosen the “government needs to pay me until the money runs out and I’ll worry about it then”-route to self-determination
"Abortion, Environmental Regulation are Priorities for Obama in Seeking Budget Compromise"
CNS: President Obama said Tuesday he would not sign a budget agreement to keep the government running that cuts funding for Planned Parenthood and the Environmental Protection Agency. “There can be some negotiation about composition,” Obama told reporters shortly after discussions with congressional leaders on the budget. “What we can’t be doing is using last year’s budget process to have arguments about abortion, to have arguments about the Environmental Protection
Fatal Risk released
Our friend and frequent commentator Roddy Boyd’s new book, Fatal Risk — an examination of AIG and its role in the 2008 financial meltdown — has been released, and to nice notices. Congrats to Roddy on the book! If you’re interested in good, solid investigative journalism — and are curious how the government and business operate sometimes in concert, other times at odds — I recommend you pick up a
"Paul Ryan’s revolution would finish Reagan’s"
James Pethokoukis, Reuters: Is Rep. Paul Ryan’s “Path to Prosperity” potentially the most important and necessary piece of economic legislation since President Ronald Reagan’s tax cuts in 1981? Quite likely. The blueprint embraces free markets and individual choice to radically reshape America’s social welfare state for the 21st century and shrink government. Instead of looking for ways to finance an ever-expanding public sector, it would prevent Washington from growing to
Mexico as Capone's Chicago?
“Calderon’s Silence on ATF Gunwalker Scandal Explained”: Anabel Hernández has made quite the charge: the Sinaloa cartel has bought the Mexican government lock, stock and Calderon. What’s more, the DEA knows about the corruption and plays ball with Calderon to catch other cartels, giving the Sinaloas a pass. Which would account for Calderon’s lack of indignation on the whole Gunwalker deal. The stink on this scandal continues to strain mightily
ATTN: WISCONSIN
Today is the day the left shows its most bald-faced contempt for our system of governance, having poured outside money into the state to defeat a sitting justice — using false and defamatory tactics — in order to install a pre-vetted, radically-liberal activist justice on the state’s Supreme Court, ensuring that they have the judicial “votes” to overrule the legislature and the will of the people of Wisconsin. Don’t let
"What really threatens our future?"
Willie Soon and Barun Mitra, NetRightDaily: Which should we fear most? Climate change that some say might happen 50 or 100 years from now? Or an energy-deprived life of continued poverty, misery, disease, and forgotten hopes and dreams? Like most honest political questions these days, these are completely rhetorical. And frankly, we’re rapidly approaching that moment when discussing any of these issues is pointless, anyway. We know the answers. Question
