Larry Sabato has helpfully and selflessly defined the 2012 electoral battleground and shockingly things look good for the Democrats. As an analysis it is absolutely hack-tacular and a stunning exemplar of the leftist approach to winning by controlling the objective label. Here’s the Battelfield Prep Lie: If you include the leans, 247 Democratic EVs 180 Republican EVs 111 Undecided. Sabato is seemingly unaware that we had an election not six

And? The only surprising thing about this is the surprise being shown over it. I should hope we’re beyond that by now. No matter our fidelity to “pragmatism”.

Mitch McConnell: “Just last year the Senate rejected a cynical effort to muzzle critics of this administration and its allies in Congress. Now, under the guise of ‘transparency,’ the Obama administration reportedly wants to know the political leanings of any company or small business, including those of their officers and directors, before the government decides if they’ll award them federal contracts. Let me be clear: No White House should be

All things considered? I’m pretty sure I’d rather be Trig. Who, unlike the pasty and fat Mr Stuef, will never willfully become a sneering slob who couldn’t get laid at an Hawaiian orgy. Covered in poi. And diamonds.

Unless by “rich” you mean, like, us. In which case, you need to step off, bra’. (thanks to a fine scotch)

Hey, pwers! A couple things you may not have known. First: In the final analysis, the leftist use of words arises from the need to achieve a position of mastery or domination. But it is subject to a destructive irony, for the world it wishes to control, erected on deception and irreality, as well as on overweening arrogance, inevitably collapses like the Tower of Babel and concludes only in the