Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

December 2012
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Archives

December 17, 2012

“Michael Moore: ‘Killing Is Our Way. We Began America w/Genocide'”

Funny, isn’t it, how this guy — and others like him — have no problem feeding themselves from the poison trough that is the USA. In Moore’s case, it’s clear, repeatedly. It’s almost as if he thinks if he calls us all pigs enough times, people will cease noticing the scruffy pink hamhocks, the pork belly flab, and the pie-caked snout that practically define this cheap, populist poseur. Fail.

Were the anthropogenic “climate change” debate really about climate change…

This would put an end to it once and for all. But because “climate change” legislation and regulation has always just been a progressive Trojan horse meant to give cover to plans for global wealth redistribution, the re-urbanization of “the masses,” and the personal financial interests of “green energy” and or / carbon credit investors, it won’t end — no matter how discredited is the science. And that’s because the

“Clackamas mall shooter faced shopper with concealed weapon”

It’s amazing what kinds of things the national media — in their haste to generalize a narrative and create a “moral imperative” that seems always to redound to the implementation of some policy on their political wishlist — leaves out of their reporting. But that’s for our own good.  Because we can’t be expected to understand the moral of any story if it isn’t shaped for us and presented unencumbered

Going on the Offensive: let’s not allow the pro-police staters to set narrative parameters

Since the day of the Connecticut shooting, I’ve tried to anticipate every cynical move progressives would likely make to try to capitalize on this (not new) “crisis”.  Because I knew they would — and indeed they have, going so far as to pretend that their calls for less freedom and, as a consequence, a larger police state, is a “moral imperative.”   But having gone on the offensive myself, I can

Also, a note to Nina Easton

Many of us are parents ourselves, and most of us are raised by at least one of our parents, be they biological or not.  We don’t need a “Parent-in-chief,” and in fact the very idea speaks to the infantilization of a nation grown more and more dependent on big government. When we elect a president we are electing an executive officeholder. Not Oprah fucking Winfrey. Unless we get back to

National conversation starter: “Texas School District Will Let Teachers Carry Guns”

There. Now it’s up to those progressives pushing their anti-liberty, pro-police state agenda to argue how it’s compassionate to post “sitting ducks” signs identifying us and our children as soft targets for armed predators — as opposed to allowing a trained, free people with a natural right to defend themselves do just that, if only to put pause to those wishing to act out megalomaniacal slaughter fantasies unencumbered by any

“The problem goes beyond the absurd conceit that a conversation about guns had yet to begin prior to this week.” [Darleen Click]

Conor Friedersdorf Awakened to that urgency, proponents of more gun control have understandably taken to the Internet in recent days to argue that epidemic gun violence in America makes tighter firearm restrictions an urgent imperative. I happen to agree at least that the gun show loophole ought to be closed. Before I go any farther, I hereby urge any legislator inclined to listen to pass such a bill now. Yet