No wonder this guy thinks the Constitution a “flawed document”: it gives voice to those who aren’t “professional politicians” — and such people really need to keep their bitter clinger mouths shut and let the super smart people (who can be identified by their having never done much besides tell others what they should be doing) do the heavy lifting. — Which, if the President wants to take this tack,

Go. I command you. (Or rather, I suggest it. Sorry. Sometimes I forget I’m not a Democratic President or a liberal judge.)

Liberals learn what it’s like to be an American business. And it couldn’t happen to a more lovely bunch. But don’t worry. Once they manage to exempt themselves from the ever-encroaching regulatory state, they’ll be all for its entangling of others. Because that’s who they are. I hope they fail. (h/t Terry H)

— if you are going to admit these days to voting for Obama, best to admit what a huge mistake it was, and own that you were duped. Suggesting you made a logical, sober, considered choice to vote for a Chitown machine pol flanked by Jerry Wright and Bill Ayers — a guy who’d been suckled on Marxism and made his bones mau-mauing the flak catchers as an Acorn race

The nannystate, lead by the historic mother Marxist hen, Barack Obama, wants to raise taxes during a jobless “recovery” (or is it a “growthless recovery,” I can never remember?) — and if he doesn’t get what he wants, if his wee American children persist in their recalcitrance and refuse to eat their peas, he’s going to put his historic mother Marxist hen’s foot down and ride the class warfare argument

Freedom tries to make a comeback: The House today is poised to vote on a bill repealing the ill-conceived ban on standard incandescent light bulbs. H.R. 2417, introduced by Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas) and supported by Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.), would eliminate the ban scheduled to begin taking effect on January 1, 2012. “The American people have voiced overwhelming opposition to the light bulb ban, and

Which is okay, so long as she’s not getting Jesus all over everything.

And for that we should be appreciative — though, when we’re being honest, we need to note that he’s simply done what we wanted him to do, and it’s rather a perverse commentary on our politics that these days we breathe a sigh of relief when our elected representatives actually represent our wishes; too, it’s worth pointing out that simply by engaging in these “negotiations,” the GOP has given Obama

Anybody ready for a third party yet? **** update: Boehner may have just saved himself, depending on what kind of “tax loopholes” get closed in any eventual deal. Incidentally, let me just mention to Mr Balz, whose article it seems is trying to cast the GOP as somehow villainous for not accepting the comprehensive budget plan under discussion, that if the President really wanted to reform entitlement programs, he wouldn’t

The current two-party ruling cabal is working just fine, thanks.