Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Obama: "eat our peas."

The nannystate, lead by the historic mother Marxist hen, Barack Obama, wants to raise taxes during a jobless “recovery” (or is it a “growthless recovery,” I can never remember?) — and if he doesn’t get what he wants, if his wee American children persist in their recalcitrance and refuse to eat their peas, he’s going to put his historic mother Marxist hen’s foot down and ride the class warfare argument all the way to the election.

Fine.

If the GOP can’t get the messaging out, I suppose the rest of us can get that done. And it would go something like this: “The top 10% of wage earners already pay 70% of the taxes. The top 1% already pay over 50% — and more than the bottom 95%. And it’s not as if Obama and the Democrats haven’t already tried raising all sort of taxes during their 2+ year long Recovery Summer, which — though the media keeps insisting is a recovery — has produced increased unemployment, an economy that shows negligible growth, and a withering away of the private sector.

“So what’s say you get your boot off the necks of the American people. Stop spending money you don’t have. And free up the American economy by allowing American businesses to do what they do — without having to filter every dollar through the federal Leviathan first, where temporary politicians who don’t produce shit presume to decide who gets that money and who has to take it in the shorts.

“That is to say, it’s time for the federal government to do without. It’s time for those who pay no taxes and vote themselves the money of those who do to ‘have some skin in the game.’ Call it ‘shared sacrifice’. You Marxist fuckers.”

Of course, had half the Senate Republicans not voted, in the Sense of the Senate, that yes, of course it’s fair to take more from millionaires, this message would be easier to sell.

On the other hand, we can always remind the Republicans that they don’t really represent us either — and we can deliver the message on the part of the people, and direct it against the ruling class in both parties who believe all money belongs first to them, and they’ll decide just how much of the fruits of our own labor we’re permitted to keep.

— Which, sorry, boys. Slavery rags makes my ass look fat, so we’re simply going to have to go a different route.

39 Replies to “Obama: "eat our peas."”

  1. I’m visualizing whirled peas.

  2. how about “eat your own damned peas instead of arugala and wagyu beef.”

  3. geoffb says:

    I should have refreshed before posting this comment.

  4. Pablo says:

    How about “Eat your own damned peas and kiss my ass.”?

  5. Pablo says:

    Boehner is holding a presser at 1:30 ET.

  6. Joe says:

    So now Obama is resorting to cliche metaphors? Okay. This first comment on Althouse’s thread works best.

  7. Nothing like reinforcing fears about the nanny state than being told to “shut up and eat your peas.”

  8. Bob Reed says:

    Obama’s says there’ll be no deal without a tax increase:

    http://news.yahoo.com/obama-challenges-gop-compromise-debt-153234996.html

    While at the same time damning the Rethugs! for their supposed “my way or the highway” attitude. But the rub there is that it’s the American people’s way as well, and, you know, considering that the right to govern comes from the consent of the governed and such…

    Really, I have to wonder if he ever actually listens to his own palaver? Because I’m far from the smartest man in the room, but even I can see the fundamental incongruency of those statements.

    The real truth, as JeffG alludes to in this post, is that Obama’s determined to have it his way, “he won!” and all, and if he can’t have it, well, the economy be damned, full Cloward-Piven ahead and class-warfare demagoguery all the way.

  9. Bob Reed says:

    Jimmy P: NO budget deal, blame Obama not the GOP.

    http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/07/10/no-big-budget-deal-blame-obama-not-boehner/

    There could have been a deal if he’d been willing to embrace at least parts of the recommendation of his phony-baloney debt commission. But instead:

    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/271537/real-deal-yuval-levin

    He basically has said, “pass my detail-challenged, reality-based, budget concept from my April speech where I rubbed Ryan’s nose in my usual demagogic palaver-and don’t expect any of your input to be considered…”

    The most post-partisan president, evar!

  10. geoffb says:

    Their fierce insistence on higher taxes is beyond bizarre. After months of demanding ‘clean’ increase to avert economic calamity (default), WH threatens economic calamity (default) unless they get economic calamity (trillions in tax hikes).

    Raising tax rates is never about increasing revenue it is always about, though never spoken of in public as about, power and control.

  11. guinsPen says:

    Did he say there’s an election coming up in six months?

  12. Joe says:

    Boehner or some Republican needs to go out there and explain raising taxes does not raise revenue, not when it depresses the economy. It actually ends up lowering revenue and causing more harm. You want to raise revenue and increase jobs? Cut the corporate tax rate, making it competitive with the rest of the world. Japan and the U.S. have the highest rate right now and guess what? It has hurt both countries.

  13. dicentra says:

    Fortunately, Twitter is on the case: #peasmovies

  14. cranky-d says:

    I hope everyone who voted for Obama goes bankrupt. Lord knows a lot of those who didn’t are going to.

  15. DarthLevin says:

    Posted by a commenter at Ann Althouse’s place:

    These days, when the President says that we have to “eat our peas”, I no longer know whether he’s offering a metaphor or invoking the Commerce Clause.

    Heh.

  16. A fine scotch says:

    I’m becoming increasingly convinced it’s James Pethokoukis’ world and we’re just living in it.

    Great post, Jeff! Please keep these coming!

  17. Carin says:

    Mr. Obama said leaders have already agreed to a series of spending cuts that will make the government “leaner, meaner, more effective, more efficient, and give taxpayers a greater bang for their buck.” Those include cuts to defense and health spending, he said.

    What a fucking joke.

  18. Jim in KC says:

    …raise taxes during a jobless “recovery” (or is it a “growthless recovery,” I can never remember?)

    I think it’s a “surprising” and “unexpected” recession…

  19. Squid says:

    “…then they’re going to have to compromise just like Democrats are going to have to compromise; just like I have shown myself willing to compromise.”

    You want compromise? Fine, I’ll give you compromise. Instead of cutting the government by 40% this year, we can cut it by 10% for each of the next five years.

    Compromise!

  20. The arguments about raising the debt level seem to me nothing more than a variant of someone who is in way over their head thinking that as long as they can meet the monthly minimums on their credit cards then there’s no real problem.

  21. How can you have any pudding if you don’t eat your peas?

  22. Matt says:

    Carin, he’s a better comedian than he is President though I’m damning him with faint praise.

  23. Ernst Schreiber says:

    I don’t know whether it’s a jobless recovery or a growthless one. I’m pretty sure that whatever it is though, it’s about to become a “negative expansion.”

    At least until a Republican is in the White House.

  24. sdferr says:

    I still like William Jacobson’s formulation as Obama’s Catch-2012:

    The only way for Obama to stimulate the enormous private sector job growth needed to ensure Obama’s reelection is for Obama to announce he is not running for reelection, which would unleash a wave of investment and economic activity not seen since the Great Depression.

    ‘Cause it’s both funny and true.

  25. Jim in KC says:

    From a guy who lives in a fantasy world where the the Office of the President-elect has its own official seal and the laws of economics and physics don’t apply, this recent pose as the adult in the room is a bit much.

  26. JD says:

    Idiot in Chief – Eat your peas.
    America – Eat my ASS!

  27. sdferr says:

    Sec. Geithner was interviewed on Meet the Press Sunday. A throw-away line from him in that interview still gets under my skin:

    It does require Congress, under our Constitution, to be willing to legislate things that would help. Like, for example–and you, you know these examples–if we could pass some trade agreements to expand export growth, that would be good.

    Fucking bastards had three or four trade deals ready to go when Obama took office. He put the brakes on them for the sake of his dearest funders, the Unions. They’re still not done. I hate these lying fucks.

  28. McGehee says:

    Eating your peas is easy when you can afford them. Those of us without green thumbs will have to stand in line with our wheelbarrows of worthless dollars to buy FLOTUS-approved Commerce Clause® peas (because the DOJ has ruled you can be required to buy them!).

    Giving new meaning to “mind your peas and queues.”

  29. happyfeet says:

    why is president Obama holding a gun to the head of America?

  30. alppuccino says:

    Ever see any peas on Michelle’s plate?

    Oh yeah:

    Pasta
    Pizza
    Philly Cheese steak
    Pastry filled with Pudding
    Pork chops

    etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. and etc.

  31. eCurmudgeon says:

    Peabagger!

  32. geoffb says:

    Q Do you see any path to a deal if they don’t budge on taxes?

    THE PRESIDENT: I do not see a path to a deal if they don’t budge, period. I mean, if the basic proposition is “it’s my way or the highway,” then we’re probably not going to get something done because we’ve got divided government. We’ve got Democrats controlling the Senate; we probably are going to need Democratic votes in the House for any package that could possibly pass. And so if, in fact, Mitch McConnell and John Boehner are sincere — and I believe they are — that they don’t want to see the U.S. government default, then they’re going to have to compromise just like Democrats are going to have to compromise; just like I have shown myself willing to compromise.

    Chip Reid.

    Q Thank you, Mr. President. You said that everybody in the room is willing to do what they have to do, wants to get something done by August 2nd. But isn’t the problem the people who aren’t in the room, and in particular Republican presidential candidates and Republican Tea Partiers on the Hill, and the American public? The latest CBS News poll showed that only 24 percent of Americans said you should raise the debt limit to avoid an economic catastrophe. There are still 69 percent who oppose raising the debt limit. So isn’t the problem that you and others have failed to convince the American people that we have a crisis here, and how are you going to change that?

    THE PRESIDENT: Well, let me distinguish between professional politicians and the public at large. The public is not paying close attention to the ins and outs of how a Treasury option goes. They shouldn’t. They’re worrying about their family; they’re worrying about their jobs; they’re worrying about their neighborhood. They’ve got a lot of other things on their plate. We’re paid to worry about it.

    I think, depending on how you phrase the question, if you said to the American people, is it a good idea for the United States not to pay its bills and potentially create another recession that could throw millions of more people out of work, I feel pretty confident I can get a majority on my side on that one.

    And that’s the fact. If we don’t raise the debt ceiling and we see a crisis of confidence in the markets, and suddenly interest rates are going up significantly, and everybody is paying higher interest rates on their car loans, on their mortgages, on their credit cards, and that’s sucking up a whole bunch of additional money out of the pockets of the American people, I promise you they won’t like that.

    Now, I will say that some of the professional politicians know better. And for them to say that we shouldn’t be raising the debt ceiling is irresponsible. They know better.

    And this is not something that I am making up. This is not something that Tim Geithner is making up. We’re not out here trying to use this as a means of doing all these really tough political things. I’d rather be talking about stuff that everybody welcomes — like new programs or the NFL season getting resolved. Unfortunately, this is what’s on our plate. It’s before us right now. And we’ve got to deal with it.

    Someone with a Harvard Graduate degree who doesn’t seem to understand that on August 2nd there will be no “default.” As long as he orders the Treasury Sec. to use incoming funds to pay the interest payments due and that there will be plenty left to fund those things that we do need to fund to keep the country from going further into recession sure seems intent on calling everyone not in that room with him too stupid to tie their own shoes.

    Putz, fucking putz.

  33. happyfeet says:

    I don’t understand why doesn’t bumble publish the deal that he says Team R is rejecting so we can look at it and see for ourselves?

    Is he a coward?

    Is America’s president a sniveling cocksucking coward?

    Is the commander in chief of America’s armed forces a quivery quivery pussy?

    I’m thinking yeah.

  34. geoffb says:

    Jake Tapper reports:

    House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, has said the amount they agree to in deficit reduction needs to be equal to – if not more than – the amount they agree to raise the debt ceiling.

    How much is that? There seemed to be consensus in the room that the amount by which they need to raise the debt ceiling is $2.4 trillion.

    That would get the government to February or March 2013. Why that date? No one thinks a lame duck Congress should take this on from November-January 2012/2013 and that would allow the new Congress and maybe a new President to get his or her sea legs before addressing this again.

    So tomorrow’s homework assignment, the president said, is for the congressional leaders to figure out how to get from $1.7 trillion to $2.4 trillion.

    Republicans are still insisting on no new taxes. Democrats say they need some revenues – a “balanced approach” – to get Democratic votes. As House Minority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Maryland, said today, “Republicans must be prepared to make concessions of their own and not put the entire burden on seniors, the middle class and the most vulnerable among us.”

    Homework! Tomorrow all report the pitbulls of their base ate the homework.

    For Steny. Pass nothing. Come August 2nd use incoming tax money to pay debt interest, Military pay VA and the wars, Soc Sec, Medicare, Medicaid, and minimal other functions. There is enough to do this. Voila, seniors fine, vunerable fine, middle class fine. Who takes the hit? Federal workforce that is not absolutely needed and that is why you Steny will never go for it as that is your BASE Mr. D-Maryland DC.

  35. geoffb says:

    Slo-Joe, lost in the 60s again.

    During another exchange, Republicans were going through proposed tax increases as bad for jobs.

    “C’mon, man!” Vice President Biden exclaimed, “let’s get real!”

    The Vice President argued that their opposition isn’t economic, it’s ideological, that no real economist thinks they’re “job killers.”

    All his “Nice Dreams” going “Up in Smoke.”

  36. geoffb says:

    Eat these peas Joey B.

    On August 4, the Treasury Department is due to pay off $30 billion in maturing short-term debt.

    If I am reading correctly, the technical default occurs after a failure to pay interests on our debt, not all of our bills. However, I am not sure why Treasury should consider this option (though it wouldn’t be unprecedented). We know now that Treasury has the ability to prioritize its payments and pay that particular $30 billion out of $172 billion in tax revenue. The Bipartisan Policy Center calculated that after paying its $30 billion in interest payments in August, it could also pay for Social Security, Medicare, unemployment benefits, and payments to defense contractors, if it ceased all other functions (page 13 of this document). So technically, there shouldn’t be a default on our debt payments.

    Oh and Joey B. she is a real economist.

  37. JD says:

    They disgust me, geoffb. Unadulterated disgust.

  38. […] raising taxes yet again is not a “magic lever” or an article of faith or the equivalent of another $800 billion […]

  39. Slartibartfast says:

    “It’s hard…to do…hard stuff.”

    President Boy Genius

Comments are closed.