me: “So. How’s it hanging?” wreath: me: “Get it? How’s it hanging?” wreath: me: “Well, I thought it was clever –” wreath: “– Look, Jewboy. It’s bad enough I have to spend Christmas strapped to the door of a non-believer. But for $14.99 I ain’t about to laugh at your lame-ass jokes, too. That’s what those $149 Pottery Barn ‘oversized magnolia garlands’ are for. They’re the high-priced hookers of the
My brief conversations with inanimate objects
my first brief conversation with the leftover savory corn casserole from last evening’s Thanksgiving meal
me: “You know what I love most about you, savory corn casserole? How unapologetically decadent you are.” savory corn casserole: me: “That takes confidence, you know?” savory corn casserole: me: “…Anyway. Just thought I’d let you know how much I appreciate you.” savory corn casserole: “Yeah, great. I’ll be sure to use your stirring words to buoy my spirits while I’m trapped in the rank folds of your colon with
my first brief conversation with my new home owners association (HOA) covenant
me: “So what you’re saying is, should I wish to build, say, a shed, I need your permission –?” HOA covenant: “—Permission, approval, blessing—whatever works for you. But yes, that’s the gist of it.” me: HOA covenant: me: HOA covenant: me: HOA covenant: me: “Well that kinda blows, don’t you think?” HOA covenant: “For you, sure. But for me? Well, let’s just say you’d be surprised what a bunch of
Another question for my Levi’s
me: “Point of pants etiquette: is it okay to wear a boot cut jean with, say, New Balance cross trainer tennis shoes, or maybe a leather dock shoe without socks?” Levi’s: “Well, that depends. Do you want a real answer?—or is this gonna be like the time I told you it was most definitely not okay to go free-balling in a loose-fit button-fly, but you went ahead and embarrassed yourself
my second brief conversation with my own patriotism (which, I admit, has been acting a bit defensively of late)
me: “Do you ever worry that you just might be the last refuge of a scoundrel?” my patriotism: “No. No moreso than I worry that I’m a legitimate excuse for you to sit around in your underwear today drinking Mexican beer simply because you got up early and hung a flag from your awning.” me: “Good point. But in my defense, I have an awful lot of lime wedges that
my first brief conversation with my own patriotism (which, I admit, has been acting a bit defensively of late)
me: “I know you generally dig the apple pie on the 4th, but how about this year we go with red white and blue-frosted cupcakes, instead? As a change of pace?” my patriotism: my patriotism: “HOW DARE YOU QUESTION MY ME!”
My fourteenth brief conversation with the ghost of John Merrick
Merrick: “I AM NOT AN ANIMAL!” Me: “Uh huh. Got a riddle for you, John. Why did the chicken cross the road?” Merrick: “– I AM A HUMAN BEING!” Me: “No, that’s not it. It’s because he saw you coming, and you totally grossed him out.” Me: “I mean, so you’re a freak, so what? Does that mean instead of the same drool- and strawberry shake-coated burlap bag day after
My ninth brief conversation with the 2mg regimen of Klonopin (clonazepam) prescribed me by my GP
me: “You know, people are beginning to talk about us.” Klonopin: “Uh huh. And…? me: “—And, well, I thought it was worthy of comment, is all. Personally, I find it kinda sweet, them taking such an interest. As a general rule, these aren’t the kind of people who pay you much attention until you’ve holed yourself up in a Texas ditch, or leaked state secrets, or posed for Vanity Fair
My thirteenth brief conversation with the ghost of John Merrick
Merrick: “I AM NOT AN ANIMAL” Me: ”Really? You might want to rethink that, pal. Seems Pam Anderson has kind of a thing for animals. And if her internet video work is any indication, she can do things to you with her mouth that would make you one torridly excited oblong-headed freak.”* Merrick: Merrick: “I AM AN ANIMAL! Me: “Attaboy. Now. Show up outside her trailer, bang your chest like
In which I discuss hermeneutics with a leftover steamed dumpling from last night’s dim sum meal, 5
steamed dumpling: “In remarks to the American Enterprise Institute, Justice Scalia, speaking on the topic of imposing foreign law on Americans, said: ‘I expect, and fear, that the Court’s use of foreign law in the interpretation of our Constitution will continue at an accelerÂÂating pace. […] First, because the “living Constitutution paradigm of interpretation prevails on today’s Court, and indeed in our legal community generally. Under this view, it is
