Dan Riehl supplies the missing context. Seems like the establishment is going all in to sink Newt and give us Romney. And if they’re unable to, you can bet that they’ll point to a Gingrich defeat — which they’ll help to fuel — as proof that we need to listen to them about which candidates are “electable” going forward. Here’s the full video of Gingrich on Reagan: Incidentally, there are

Looked at logically, it’s a veritable recipe for creating a democratic socialist state run by a liberal fascist dictatorship: take from those who already pay, launder that plunder through the federal government, and give a portion of it to those who already don’t pay. In such a way do you eventually decrease the number of those who can pay; increase the number of those who can’t; and make all of

Why, yes, yes he is. But only for those already being backed by government sponsored entities. The rest of you can pound sand. You see, it’s all about how you manage big government. And the ability to manage big government only comes if you can get elected. Which only happens if you pander, and promise to govern like a Democrat — albeit a more responsible, more thrifty Democrat. That’s the

I’m feeling surreal in Obama’s America.

Some pig’s “fair shares” are more equal than others’. Evidently.

“FirstEnergy closing 6 plants due to new EPA rules.” Result? Higher energy costs, a loss of real local jobs, a further diminution of domestic energy independence, and, inasmuch as the cost of electricity impacts the cost of doing business, higher prices on products and services that at some stage require the use of electricity. None of which matters, really. Because Obama read some William Blake once, and coal, it turns