Two years later, and I still don’t have a freaking clue. Question: Does Patrick Fitzgerald know? If Ms Plame was “outed,” was it intentional? If not, should the investigation even have proceeded? I ask all of these questions in good faith, because I honestly don’t know. What I do know, however, is that what pushed this investigation is the suggestion that the White House used classified information to “out” Plame
red pills found behind the sofa cushions, analepsis 11
Sure, he let it slip after pulling 16 moist hits off a 250 gram block of primo Moroccan hash and eating an entire white pizza—but still, when the dolphin in the pea coat tells you that “Val” Plame hasn’t been “covert” since a 1994 incident involving two bottles of Ikon, a dwarfish North Korean dignitary, and an unfortunate karaoke slip-up, well, let’s just say you put down the waterpipe and
“Aide to Cheney Appears Likely to Be Indicted; Rove Under Scrutiny”
From the NYT, Oct 28: Lawyers in the C.I.A. leak case said Thursday that they expected I. Lewis Libby Jr., Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff, to be indicted on Friday, charged with making false statements to the grand jury. Karl Rove, President Bush’s senior adviser and deputy chief of staff, will not be charged on Friday, but will remain under investigation, people briefed officially about the case said.
“A Separate Peace”
Some folks won’t like this Peggy Noonan piece much. But for me, it struck a nerve. Of course, had today been a Friday, maybe I’d feel a bit differently. Being naked in a tub of Guinness wouldn’t hurt things, either.
McConnell?
Hugh Hewitt: Because the assault from the left on the next nominee is going to be so intense, it makes sense to nominate a judge who has recently been vetted and FBI-checked. Fairly recent Senate hearings are also a plus, as they will demonstrate the necessary ability to handle the heat that is on the way. Because cases coming before the SCOTUS in the near future include some crucial decisions—including
The media spin (and the liguistic turn)
Question: how many “bases” does the President have, exactly? I mean, for years we’ve been hearing from Democrats and the legacy media how James Dobson, Hugh Hewitt, the evangelicals, et al, are Bush’s “right wing” conservative base—but these are the very people who, in addition to GOP party pragmatists, by and large were most supportive of the Miers nomination. And yet today, all I’m hearing is that Bush caved to
“Possible Civil Suit Looms As Threat in CIA-Leak Case”
From the WSJ (subscribers only, so I’ll excerpt at length): In addition to the prospect of indictments looming in the CIA leak case, the Bush administration faces another threat: civil litigation that could expose top officials to damage payments and years of wide-ranging scrutiny. Former diplomat Joseph Wilson, whose criticism of the administration’s Iraq policy sparked the current furor and led to the outing of his Central Intelligence Agency-operative wife,
“Democratic leader: Right wing killed Miers’ nomination”
Via Raw Story: Washington, D.C. – Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid released the following statement on Harriet Miers’ withdrawal of her nomination to the United States Supreme Court. “The radical right wing of the Republican Party killed the Harriet Miers nomination. Apparently, Ms. Miers did not satisfy those who want to pack the Supreme Court with rigid ideologues. “I had recommended that the President consider nominating Ms. Miers because I
a short conversation with my fourth double martini, 2
me: “So. Wanna drink some wine, curl up on the couch, maybe listen to Glass Houses?” double martini: me: “… ‘she stood on the tracks, waving her arms, leading me to that third rail, shock—quick as a wink, she changed her mind’…” double martini: “Dude. Do I have tits? Go to bed. Seriously. You’re making me uncomfortable.”
Uh oh…
Lookie like some uppity darkie done gone an’ shuffled off’n dat ol’ liberal plantation agin’! (h/t LGF)
