Levin’s new book, The Liberty Amendments, debuts tomorrow — and he’s already bracing for a full-throated attack from the GOP establishment and the left, neither of which he believes will prove effective, given his avowed promise to return fire without sugar coating his thoughts. — Which sound vaguely familiar. I mean, take away the millions in salary and the 8+ million listeners — and add hair and impressive physical strength
August 2013
Flashback: “Full audio of 1998 ‘redistribution’ speech: Obama saw welfare recipients as ‘majority coalition’”
Two failed presidential elections later, is it safe to say that we’re beyond the unhelpful stage, and that further exposing what many of us — Rush Limbaugh (and credit where it’s due, Sean Hannity) among them — already knew about Obama and his political ideology before he was ever elected, is now allowable? I mean, we pretended it didn’t exist and showed our graciousness in defeat to the Good Man
In response to the fascinating (and utterly predictable, in my circles) exchange dicentra details below
As dicentra knows, her interlocutor’s “dialogue” is but a typical grad-level regurgitation of anti-foundationalism applied to politics in an effort to lazily and cleverly pull a PhD from the leftists who wish to see capitalism replaced by liberal fascism, which they will always claim is a stepping stone to egalitarian communism, but which never arrives there, given the necessity of the more clever pigs to manage the rest of the
What would you accept as evidence? [guest post by dicentra]
I jumped in on an interesting an ultimately distressing little conversation on Twitter yesterday. Most of the exchange is here, including what came before I jumped in. (I haven’t read it all and don’t need the headache.) I’ve also inserted things that Twitter didn’t thread. My interlocutor, @SettlerColonial, is writing a PhD thesis, and we got into the nature of property rights. @SettlerColonial has stopped responding to my tweets, so
“CONFIRMED: John Boehner holding secret meetings with Chuck Schumer to slip Amnesty for Illegals past the GOP base”
Establishment Republicans: we’re kinda like the Democrats, only our enemies actually register under our own party affiliation, if you can believe that. Ironic, eh? Here, let me diagram this on my Very Official Looking GOP white board: TEA Party Hobbits / Purists / True Believers / Ideological Visigoths = losing seats that might otherwise be held by more moderate Republicans. Plus, like, teabaggers. Gross, amiright? So it follows: More seats
Harry Reid: ObamaCare will be moot in a few years … [Darleen Click]
… because single-payer has always been the goal In just about seven weeks, people will be able to start buying Obamacare-approved insurance plans through the new health care exchanges. But already, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is predicting those plans, and the whole system of distributing them, will eventually be moot. Reid said he thinks the country has to “work our way past” insurance-based health care during a Friday night
“NSA head says agency working to reduce leaks by replacing people with machines”
This brings to mind a spirited exchange from one of the 80s most endearingly optimistic anti-war movies: McKittrick: General, the machine has locked us out. It’s sending random numbers to the silos. Pat Healy: Codes. To launch the missiles. General Beringer: Just unplug the goddamn thing! Jesus Christ! McKittrick: That won’t work, General. It would interpret a shutdown as the destruction of NORAD. The computers in the silos would carry
CA Public Employee Unions behind Democrat bill to slap non-union contractors with a Scarlet Letter … [Darleen Click]
… or maybe a Yellow Star Senate Bill 556 is another sad example of how legislative Democrats can’t say no to their main benefactor, public employee unions, even at the expense of the voters they represent. This bill is costly, unnecessary and meddlesome — a legislative solution in search of a problem. Authored by Sen. Ellen Corbett of San Leandro, SB 556 would require contract employees working for state or
“Bozell: Press are ‘Enablers’ of ‘Outright Bigotry Against Christians'”
More phony rightwing attempts at playing the victim card. I mean, honestly: a war on Christians? Are we supposed to believe that kind of pathetic neediness from the very religious, patriarchal strata that continues to dominate our culture and reify — not to mention lionize — its values through dogmatic infiltration of God into the social and political discourse? Pshaw, I say. Crass, opportunistic identity politicking — the kind of
Slate will no longer refer to the Washington Redskins as the Washington Redskins
In an apparent attempt to fire back, the Redskins organization, upon learning of the news, released to me the following brief statement: What in the fuck is “Slate,” and why are you bothering us by forwarding along this moronic porridge of PC rabble rousing? “Slate” can call us the Washington Klan Hoods, for all we care. Because you know what? It turns out normal people don’t much give a shit
