I actually shot last week, but I haven’t had time to post the results until now. Same set up: SCAR-17H using 145 gr mil surplus .308 ammo off a swivel bipod at 100 yards. This time, however, I did some of the shooting with the bipod closed and used as a fore grip. Also, I removed the blocked out areas I’d drawn on the earlier targets just to see how
October 31, 2012
Plausible?
Rush Limbaugh believes some polling outfits are sacrificing future credibility for a chance to aid in a strategy to invalidate a Romney victory. I’m not sure how they’d do this with the internals made available publicly — for instance, Obama +5 in Ohio is based on a +7 Democrats polling differential, which would make using that as “proof” of disenfranchisement or voter suppression easily debunked — so they’d have to
“Obama’s environmental policies extend to America’s oceans—and into the upcoming elections”
Rebekah Rast: In 2010, when President Obama passed his executive order “Stewardship of the Ocean, Our Coasts, and the Great Lakes,” he claimed it “strengthens ocean governance and coordination, establishes guiding principles for ocean management, and adopts a flexible framework for effective coastal and marine spatial planning to address conservation, economic activity, user conflict, and sustainable use of the ocean, our coasts and the Great Lakes.” Not everyone agrees with
It came from DC
Ladd goes out on a high note. Still, I’d have liked to see a guy with a mustache smoking a cigarette pasted in there. For no reason. Just because. But I’m weird that way. **** update: By the way, if you have the means, consider throwing a few bucks each to Josh Mandel, Connie Mack, Richard Mourdock, Todd Akin, Deb Fischer, and Jeff Flake on the Senate side; and West,
“Gingrich: Senator told me networks may have White House emails commanding counterterrorism group to stand down on Benghazi rescue”
Leave aside whether or not it’s true. The question is, would it at all surprise you at this point? And what does that say about what our mainstream press has become? Those are rhetorical questions, naturally. (h/t sdferr)
“When They Called; President Obama failed on Benghazi”
The only problem with this pac ad? Is that it doesn’t run on a continuous loop for the next week. (thanks to John R)
Pursuant to my last post: “Obama Met With Panetta and Biden at WH As Benghazi Terror Attack Unfolded”
What they discussed, however, no one can say. Some because they can’t. Others because they refuse to. Because they’re scum: President Barack Obama met with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Vice President Joe Biden at the White House on Sept. 11, 2012 at 5:00 PM—just 55 minutes after the State Department notified the White House and the Pentagon that the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi was under attack. The meeting
“Obama Tells Americans, ‘We Leave Nobody Behind'”
Sorry, I had a longer, more thoughtful post written up about this, but I scrapped it, because it gave the President too much benefit of the doubt. And he doesn’t deserve that, in my opinion. This guy is scum. It’s that simple. Manipulative, self-interested, narcissistic, insular political scum. And his use of that line was intentional, I have no doubt, and meant to be subtly suggestive — to blunt the
