The article to which Derbyshire’s piece was a response. Incidentally, I should add that my comment on the Steyn article — pointing out that Derb’s article isn’t “indefensible” — never made it through moderation. Take that for what it’s worth. And this, too.
April 9, 2012
“Polls suggest politics of envy won’t reelect Obama”
That’s not much of a surprise, really. More of a surprise is that it turns out what will reelect him is “the promise of free fish tacos and a year’s worth of HBO.” Well, if you’re talking about my vote, at least. — Which, hey, don’t judge, lest ye wish to be judged, is all’s I’m saying.
“Obama’s ‘War on Women’ Rhetoric Not Resonating”
From the Independent Women’s Voice: On Friday, President Obama hosted something called the “White House Forum on Women and the Economy.” The most galling statement he made at the event was undoubtedly his proclamation that, “women are not some monolithic group, women are not an interest group,” while subsequently hosting a forum that treats women as just that. […] It’s clear that the strategy of President Obama and the progressive
Boeing caves
Losing more slowly. Rather than standing up for its free market rights, Boeing instead chose to cut a deal with Obama’s union goons. The company’s surrender not only gave Big Labor the concessions it was seeking with regard to the company’s expansion plans — more importantly it preserved the NLRB’s ability to use such thuggish tactics in the future against other companies (which Obama signaled he was more than happy
