Schrödinger: “I know you’ve checked the box already. But keep checking. Trust me on this.”
Search
Archive Calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |
Archives
Categories
- A Government That Can Force You to Buy Health Insurance Can Make You Do Anything (3)
- a protein wisdom philosophy primer (3)
- academics (25)
- armadillo (8)
- Friday Fiction 100 Word Challenge (51)
- from the protein wisdom conceptual series (136)
- identity politics (33)
- If Republicans Win the Senate in 2014 (1)
- in which celebraties comment on current events (67)
- language / intentionalism (88)
- legal (6)
- My brief conversations with inanimate objects (130)
- NSA / FISA (46)
- One Term to Serve, the 2012 Revival (6)
- Overheard in a Fallujah bunker (27)
- Poems from 196x, Revised by the Ghost of Richard Brauti (27)
- protein wisdom's DNC coverage (30)
- protein wisdom's RNC coverage (29)
- protein wisdom: the movie Lists (20)
- Provocateurism (16)
- real-time empirical observations (51)
- red pills found behind the sofa cushions (42)
- Scenes from my driveway (61)
- Talking back to 80s music (41)
- The Martha Stewart Chronicles (58)
- The protein wisdom interviews (10)
- The protein wisdom original poems (142)
- Uncategorized (20,046)
- Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance, abridged (34)
Recent Comments
- In The Mailbox: 02.28.23 (Afternoon Edition) : The Other McCain on Hey, longtime pw readers…
- In The Mailbox: 12.23.22 : The Other McCain on Patrick J. Carroll truly IS a sad, embittered psychopath
- Danger on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
- Danger on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
- In The Mailbox: 07.18.22 : The Other McCain on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
Schrödinger’s cat:
Box:
Well, I get the pervious comment anyway. Stupid cat couldn’t count, apparently.
tw: “big69” – ohboyohboyohboy!
I also got the previous comment…
I hope I provided some sort of Muse-like inspiration for this post with my previous comment.
At least in my delusional fantasy world I did.
I get the post, but not so much the comments.
Robb —
You did, in fact, remind me of this series. Or you didn’t.
See?
Irony: The first time I read the last comment, I didn’t see the “or you didn’t.”
The second time, it was the only thing I saw.
I find that this entry both is and isn’t funny.
OK, so here’s my question:
What if you put Schrödinger in the box instead of his cat? Surely he’s a qualified observer.
If you never open the box and check on him, is he alive or dead?
Depends. Can he have a hooker with him?
In Vegas, yes.
“No, Officer, I don’t know how fast I was going. But I know exactly where I am.”
Did anyone ever think of asking the cat?
Can the cat even talk?
Christ, I can’t believe I’m forced to ask twice in the same day: is Hillary smoking crack?
Breaking news: the cat is dead, okay?
BTW: I just received the book “Shroedinger’s Rabbits” as a gift. I am not kidding. Apparently it claims that quantum uncertainty is explained by the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Well, thats your problem right there!
Officer to Schrödinger – pulled over for doing 60mph in a school zone:
“Do you have any idea where you are, and how fast you were going?!”
Schrödinger’s old lady:
“Oh Christ, here we go again!”
Methinks Ya’ll are conflating with Heisenberg.
Damn, I was in the wrong quantum physics thread.
I would be more interested in who has to clean out the cat box.
Is there a turd in there, or not?
Seems to explain alphoid (Curiously Wrong!™ ) and markg8…
Because otherwise nobody would ever read me
BECAUSE OF THE RELEVANCY!!!
Well, its a theory.
Tramadol….
Tramadol side effects. Tramadol 100mg. Tramadol dog. Tramadol….