Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

POLITICAL SHOCKER: Revered Republican spokesman who went for Obama in 2008 thinks unseemly Hobbits lack the intelligence and nuance to properly decide what candidate best represents their interests

Okay, so I paraphrased. But you get the idea.

Honestly, guys. If you don’t vote GOP and you don’t support the conservatism putatively at the Party’s ideological heart, then from an ontological standpoint I’m not quite sure what it is, exactly, that allows you to claim yourself a “Republican” to begin with?

What? The No Labels Party not exactly catching fire like you expected? No populist uprising for your sort of squishy, pragmatic, status-quo “compassionate” nannystatism? No room left in the pundit pool for yet another self-professed “centrist” Democrat pretending to be a conservative?

Pity.

But seriously. What are you people still doing here?

21 Replies to “POLITICAL SHOCKER: Revered Republican spokesman who went for Obama in 2008 thinks unseemly Hobbits lack the intelligence and nuance to properly decide what candidate best represents their interests”

  1. Maybe this will explain it.

    Maybe not. But I can’t hear his name without giggling like a schoolgirl.

  2. Slartibartfast says:

    No Labels Party

    STOP LABELING THEM!

  3. Slartibartfast says:

    “Nappy Meal” is sooooo racist, LMC.

  4. Isn’t a basketball for miles, Slart. I’m in the clear.

  5. geoffb says:

    Related on McCain.

    When Carl Levin, John McCain and Lindsey Graham on one side and the ACLU, Dick Durbin, Patrick Leahey, Diane Feinstein, and some conservatives on the other I wonder what’s really in this thing?

  6. happyfeet says:

    Colin Powell is a whore. A deeply racist whore. What’s with his weirdo adulation of slavery compromises?

    He’s as bat-shit crazy as his wife I think.

  7. sdferr says:

    Compromise is how this country was founded, and unless two people in disagreement with each other don’t find a way to reach out to one another and make compromises, you don’t get a consensus that allows you to move forward.

    But the Tea Party point of view of no compromise whatsoever is not a point of view that will eventually produce a presidential candidate who will win.

    Is Powell so dense that he doesn’t understand the distinction between law-givers founding a Constitutional Document agreeing as to ends and law-makers working under that Constitutional Document disagreeing as to means to achieve those ends?

    Yet, the compromise on offer today is a compromise to extra-Constitutionally subvert the very Constitutional foundation he lauds, a new compromise with progressives, proposed to re-make the ends the Constitution set out to secure. It is simply, as has been noted over and again, an ends versus means distinction.

    So either Powell is dense and doesn’t understand the question before the people, or he chooses to elide the fundamental question at hand. Once again — just as with Obama — generating a weird “stupid or lying?” sort of juxtaposition.

  8. Pablo says:

    Oh. For a minute there, I thought you meant this staunch conservative opinion leader.

  9. mojo says:

    Shorter media: “NOOOOO! The BLUE pill!!!”

  10. To be fair, Andrew Sullivan is correct that the GOP is not conservative. Meanwhile, to posit himself as conservative is silly.

  11. Drumwaster says:

    I like the comment “if you leave the party, you’ll be out of a job the next day, because the media needs fake Republicans”…

  12. dicentra says:

    But seriously. What are you people still doing here?

    The pie. It’s always about the pie.

    Though I wouldn’t complain if you mixed it up a bit with some cake.

  13. cranky-d says:

    It’s so much easier to emote than it is to reason. Emotions come very naturally to humans, reason requires discipline.

    Hence, what we have now.

  14. Jeff G. says:

    The GOP isn’t. But that’s why conservatives should either fight to make it so or finally leave it. No more voting against our own interests for the lesser of two evils. To do so is to grant legitimacy and permanency to that choice set.

  15. DarthLevin says:

    Ya know what you get when you choose the lesser of two evils?

    Evil.

  16. motionview says:

    I think I’m at the point that I’m only supporting people who will work for the TEA Party Budget and everyone else can pound sand.

  17. JD says:

    Frank. Frum. Froomkin. See a pattern?

  18. LBascom says:

    I don’t think Powell ever got over the mean things people said about him for saying Saddam had WMD.

    He’s desperately trying now and forever to win the back the favor of Washington elite types.

    It’s sad.

  19. Is it better to be revered or pauled?

  20. leigh says:

    Powell’s douchebaggery is legendary. The husband knew him in Vietnam and Colin was a douche even then.

  21. Crawford says:

    I don’t think Powell ever got over the mean things people said about him for saying Saddam had WMD.

    He’s desperately trying now and forever to win the back the favor of Washington elite types.

    Nah. He made up for that by having his flunky shaft Scooter.

Comments are closed.