Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Archives

Judge Ye Not, Lest Ye Bee Gees-ed

“[…An] appeals court has interrupted the work of the famed Condom Judge of Brooklyn,” the New York Post’s Andrea Peyser reports.

Supreme Court Justice Gustin Reichbach earned that nickname a decade ago, when he handed out condoms to hookers and addicts from his bench in Criminal Court.

But it is Reichbach’s continued sensitivity toward more violent sorts that drives prosecutors to the Maalox and honest citizens to their homes. And it forced the Appellate Division this week to publicly spank the perp-loving jurist.

The case involves a confounding ruling last year, in which Reichbach turned loose one Omar Hills. Hills, 28, was caught by police as he allegedly ran through East New York late one night in 2000, armed with a 9mm handgun.

Who knows what mind-addling cleaning fluids they’re using in Brooklyn, but Reichbach threw out the gun and Hills’ confession as evidence, ruling that ‘four powerful and self-assured officers from the Street Crime Unit’ had improperly searched Hills.

This, after the cops insisted there was no search. Hills, not exactly the brightest bulb in his criminal class, had stopped to chit-chat with cops, one of whom saw the butt of a gun in his pants.

Upon arrest, Hills allegedly said, ‘You got me; I f- – – ed up.’

So? What’s wrong with a compassionate judge handing out condoms to filthy street hussies and protecting the rights of the weak and dim-witted (who just happen to be armed)?

Our legal system can be cruel sometimes — there’s no debating that point. Consequently, we need jurists who will prosecute their duties with solicitousness and an eye toward both rehabilitation and the innate goodness of those gun-toting drug addicts who roam city streets aimlessly.

I mean, what would Harry Stone do, for Godssakes…?

In a stroke of sanity, the appeals court reinstated the evidence. Now, DA Charles Hynes gets another crack at locking up Hills.

I’ve got to give Reichbach credit. He calls me back.

‘I thought [the ruling] was proper,’ he said yesterday, displaying contempt for the appeals court’s decision to side with cops.

‘The fact of the matter is that I saw everybody testify,’ he said. ‘I think being able to observe gives one a better means of judging than viewing things on the printed record.’

Michael Pulizotto, the young prosecutor on the losing end of Reichbach’s ruling, argued the appeal himself. This time, it was personal.

‘This was a violent person with an unlicensed, loaded handgun on the streets of Brooklyn, something that could do a lot of damage,’ Pulizotto said.

Back in 1968, when Reichbach was a student radical at Columbia University, he authored a tract called ‘The Bust Book: What to Do Till the Lawyer Comes.’

I can only imagine Chapter 1:

‘When in trouble, make sure to get a judge like me.’

Age hasn’t mellowed the Condom Judge. Let’s hope the higher courts continue to bring him down to earth.

Go ahead and be flippant, Andrea. But sometimes, Harry Stone would do magic tricks from the bench. That kept the court loose. You can’t tell me that such antics don’t make justice fun.

If I’m ever arrested, I hope my presiding judge does magic tricks, or hands out condoms, or throws out evidence because he’s a former student radical who mistrusts cops.

Or is named Lance Ito.

4 Replies to “Judge Ye Not, Lest Ye Bee Gees-ed”

  1. Dean says:

    Jeff,

    Can’t tell if you’re kidding or not. But if you’re not, let me just wonder whether you’d welcome such a judge, if you’re called in to ID the body of your wife, your kids, one of your students?

  2. Jeff G says:

    I’m always kidding, Dean.

    But just so we’re clear—what does a story about a Judge who throws out as an “invalid search” the eyesight of four police officers have to do with ID-ing the body of my wife, or kids, or one of my students?

    After all, he just may be the one responsible for freeing the person who’s murdered my wife, kids, or one of my students…

  3. Dean says:

    Jeff,

    Hmmm. Lately, I’ve been imputing folks w/ different intentions than what they seem to have meant in their postings.

    I read your piece, and thought you were DEFENDING the judge who threw out the four officers’ eyewitness ID. Which was why I wondered if you’d have thought it as funny if you were IDing said wife, kids, students. Thus, the question about whether you were kidding or not.

    I probably haven’t been getting enough sleep. My apologies for reading your posting and drawing the exact OPPOSITE conclusion from what you meant.

  4. Jeff G says:

    Think nothing of it.  I suppose my sarcasm is becoming indistinguishable from the rest of my modes of communicating.

    Harry Stone is a boob.  Or if you prefer, I’ve Judged Amy, and I find her wanting…

Comments are closed.