Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

“The Awful Anti-Semitism of The Washington Post’s Pat Oliphant”

Benjamin Kerstein, The New Ledger:

It must be said […] that Oliphant’s cartoon is somewhat unique in adopting […] these themes into a single image, reflecting the cumulative influence of antisemitisms both past and present. Combined with its publication in a prestigious American newspaper, it indicates that a convergence of sorts is occurring. It seems that a process which has been underway since the second intifada began has now reached a new peak (or nadir). The phenomenon in question is simply this: As a result of the hatred of Israel prevalent in many circles in the West, classic antisemitic mythology and imagery, especially those employed by Nazism, have been relegitimized, mainly as a result of their widespread use in the Arab and Muslim media, where the taboo against overt antisemitism does not exist.

This is all, in a certain sense, ironic, because the use of these images is justified—implicitly or explicitly—by their creators through equating the Jews to the Nazis. In doing precisely this, however, the artists are employing Nazi imagery of the most obvious kind. In effect, they are accusing the Jews of being Nazis by, in a sense, becoming Nazis themselves. Irony, however, is not particularly comforting, and it is no solution to the very old problem of people who cannot relate to the Jews—and, by extension, Israel—without collapsing into the sleep of reason which, as Goya himself said, brings forth monsters.

Well, I’ll give Oliphant credit for one thing: he was smart enough not to bring monkeys or The Prophet into any of this.

Ironically, for all their secret world power, the Jews seem best at making themselves easy targets and scapegoats.

Maybe they should take that up at the next meeting of ZOG.

****
related (h/t Geezer)

69 Replies to ““The Awful Anti-Semitism of The Washington Post’s Pat Oliphant””

  1. The Compassionate Left says:

    It’s not that we hate the Jews. I promise, when they’re all gone we’ll remember them almost fondly.

  2. LTC John says:

    New York Money Men … ASSEMBLE! I guess with the old Soviet ear campaign posters back in vogue, it was inevitable that the Nazi 1930s agit-prop would slime its way back forth too.

    Everything old (and bad) is new (and hip) again!

  3. LTC John says:

    um, Soviet era, that is… I do wonder what a Soviet ear poster would look like, tho’.

  4. The Compassionate Left says:

    almost.

  5. JournoList says:

    Let’s just say if we were playing kickball, we’d pick Oliphant before Peretz.

  6. The Pragmatic Republicans says:

    So would we.

  7. Sdferr says:

    When comes the day that fuckers like Oliphant suffer actual (and well deserved) beatdowns on the street? Can’t be too far off, I’m thinking.

  8. Alec Leamas says:

    I think the Left’s tentative former embrace of the Jews was really nothing more than an embrace of a reliable Leftist-activism substituted for religion on the part of too many Jews. Thus, the antisemitism is allowable because it is coming from the Jews’ left flank – in large part a punishment for not being Jewish qua Leftist enough.

    Plus, the Palestinians are more brown than your average Jew, so they’re obviously right about everything.

  9. U-238 says:

    In the midst of all the high minded explainations of the iconographic meanings, one does wonder why the left loses thier ability to just yell “RACIST!!!!”

    Personally, I blame Sandy Kofax, Mel Brooks and Lenny Kravitz. Mostly, Kravitz because he scored Lisa Bonet. He’s also my damn hero.

  10. Broker1 says:

    I am waiting for Rush round 2. “If Obama fails America is saved.” Will that be any better for the “moderates?”

  11. Sdferr says:

    So we won’t be hearing anything about nappy-headed ho’s out of Oliphant anytime soon I take it, Alec?

  12. The Pragmatic Republicans says:

    Broker1,

    Not if the MSM tells us it isn’t.

  13. Veeshir says:

    The problem is that the Jews always used to put their less talented people in the department that controls the media.

    What’s happening now is that they saw the problem and tried to fix it so they’ve moved some incompetents out of Running the Media and moved them over to the department in charge of the world’s economy.

    Eh, at least they didn’t put them in charge of American Elections.
    Wait…..

  14. Joe says:

    All I know is Jews can work magic with a few eggs, chicken stock, and some matzoh meal.

  15. OCBill says:

    It seems like everyone is focusing on Oliphant’s intent. Isn’t that just wrong? Have we learned NOTHING?

  16. The Pragmatic Republicans says:

    OCBill,

    We haven’t and never will…

  17. psycho... says:

    When comes the day that fuckers like Oliphant suffer actual (and well deserved) beatdowns on the street? Can’t be too far off, I’m thinking.

    The day when they supervise the delivery of street beatdowns has to come first. And the day when they watch over unsupervised (by them) street beatdowns with a smile — then rhapsodize them in the press — has to come before that. They’re only ready for that day, so it’ll be a few years before their beatdown comes.

    But!

    You guys could bring it by, say, nominating Cantor in 2012. Having Palin around would help, too. Unfocused hate finds a focus. Especially if he’s right there, bein’ all Jewy. Then it unfocuses, differently. And it’s street beatdown time.

    I say do it. Waiting isn’t preparing.

  18. Lamontyoubigdummy says:

    I wonder how many cubicles at the UN have that cartoon tacked up in them?

    I guess to be fair, they never really understood Dilbert.

  19. pdbuttons says:

    how many capitalist whore dogs
    can u fit in a volkswagen?

  20. Sdferr says:

    Ah fuck, nothing like organization for getting organized, not organizized.

  21. Lamontyoubigdummy says:

    “The day when they supervise the delivery of street beatdowns has to come first. And the day when they watch over unsupervised (by them) street beatdowns with a smile — then rhapsodize them in the press — has to come before that. They’re only ready for that day, so it’ll be a few years before their beatdown comes.”

    I caught “Green Street Hooligans” on cable the other night. What we need are some proper conservative “firms.” Bypass all that “supervised/ press rhapsody” shit and just fuck some Oliphants up. Plus, those guys HATED “journos.”

    Did I mention it was a good movie?

  22. TheGeezer says:

    And this today online. Our culture is derailing. It’s getting scary.

    WTF is wrong with our intelligentsia?

  23. Sdferr says:

    Not enough beatdowns Geezer, that simple.

  24. Lamontyoubigdummy says:

    Sweet fancy Moses. That play Geezer linked to was written by a guy named CHURCHILL!

    The British ought to have a fucking law.

    First Obama returns Churchill’s bust (presumably because it clashed with the Che poster Michelle put up behind it), and now this.

    Goddamnit.

  25. blowhard says:

    Sometimes you don’t even need a beatdown, Sdferr.

    I once accidentally bumped into a guy who was recklessly tailgating me not two minutes before.

    He apologized twice and ran off before I realized he was the tailgater and he thought I had followed him to the grocery store. It was a funny moment. I honestly couldn’t figure out why someone would apologize to me for being in produce section.

  26. Sdferr says:

    Mostly, I think of somebody’s fist upside Oliphant’s head as I do Dr. Johnson’s foot to the stone.

    “After we came out of the church, we stood talking for some time together of Bishop Berkeley’s ingenious sophistry to prove the non-existence of matter, and that every thing in the universe is merely ideal. I observed, that though we are satisfied his doctrine is not true, it is impossible to refute it. I never shall forget the alacrity with which Johnson answered, striking his foot with mighty force against a large stone, till he rebounded from it, ‘I refute it thus.'”
    – Boswell’s Life of Samuel Johnson

    But yeah, I take your point, it’s still a meetup with the real world.

  27. alppuccino says:

    Well, I guess the lid’s off for a cartoon of Obama doing smack.

  28. blowhard says:

    Somewhat related, from Max Boot.

  29. blowhard says:

    Sdferr, hilarious book, I’m still going through my first reading.

    My favorite part so far? The anecdote about Johnson’s young schoolmates carrying him on their shoulders because of his obvious genius. I can’t quite make out if that is a joke and if so, who’s joke? Boswell’s, to relate it as he does, tongue firmly in cheek? Johnson’s, to tell it to Boswell, tongue firmly in cheek?

  30. blowhard says:

    who’s=whose, obviously

  31. blowhard says:

    Here it is:

    “That superiority over his fellows, which he maintained with so much dignity in his march through life, was not assumed from vanity and ostentation, but was the natural and constant effect of those extraordinary powers of mind, of which he could not but be conscious by comparison; the intellectual difference, which in other cases of comparison of characters, is often a matter of undecided contest, being as clear in his case as the superiority of stature in some men above others. Johnson did not strut or stand on tip-toe; he only did not stoop. From his earliest years, his superiority was perceived and acknowledged. He was from the beginning, Anax andron, a king of men. His schoolfellow, Mr. Hector, has obligingly furnished me with many particulars of his boyish days; and assured me that he never knew him corrected at school, but for talking and diverting other boys from their business. He seemed to learn by intuition; for though indolence and procrastination were inherent in his constitution, whenever he made an exertion he did more than any one else. In short, he is a memorable instance of what has been often observed, that the boy is the man in miniature: and that the distinguishing characteristicks of each individual are the same, through the whole course of life. His favourites used to receive very liberal assistance from him; and such was the submission and deference with which he was treated, such the desire to obtain his regard, that three of the boys, of whom Mr. Hector was sometimes one, used to come in the morning as his humble attendants, and carry him to school. One in the middle stooped, while he sat upon his back, and one on each side supported him; and thus he was borne triumphant. Such a proof of the early predominance of intellectual vigour is very remarkable, and does honour to human nature. — Talking to me once himself of his being much distinguished at school, he told me, “they never thought to raise me by comparing me to any one; they never said, Johnson is as good a scholar as such a one; but such a one is as good a scholar as Johnson; and this was said but of one, but of Lowe; and I do not think he was as good a scholar.””
    – Boswell’s Life of Johnson

  32. Sdferr says:

    You don’t reckon that Mr Hector could be an invention to take us to Mr Achilles, do you? :-)

  33. blowhard says:

    Funny, yeah, the thought had crossed my mind.

  34. ushie says:

    Man, those darn Jews are more unstoppable than the Sccoby gang.

  35. ushie says:

    “Sccoby”

    You know what I meant. That was my intent.

  36. pdbuttons says:

    scooby on the roof
    w/ more zero mostel
    and cartoon pranks…
    like-diving off the twin towers
    cartoon like
    no harm no fowl
    we all land in a crescent
    hold hands aka grinch and sing
    if i was a rich man-da da dada dada dum

  37. Lamontyoubigdummy says:

    “Man, those darn Jews are more unstoppable than the Scooby gang.”

    Iran: “We’d have gotten away with it too, if it weren’t for those meddling Jews!”

    Scooby: “Jew-be-doo-be-doo!”

  38. Kirk says:

    Weird, how some people are sensitive to some names thrown at them (for instance the approbation that arose from this), but those same people don’t mind tossing epithets at others…I’m guessing Mr. Oliphant’s heart is as curdled as the commenters think, since they have carefully divined his intention to criticize not a state, but an entire race. Weird how some can do that.

    Could you guys pass a list of the sorts of people who can criticize Israeli policies to the Post. I’m sure they wouldn’t want to offend you careful diviners of truth and offense.

  39. blowhard says:

    A list?

    Let’s get started, ummm, okay, I just thought of one.

    1. People who intentionally portray Israel as a Nazi state.

    2. I don’t know, do you need more or does this cover it for you?

  40. blowhard says:

    Actually, Kirk, let’s reverse this.

    What do you think of the cartoon? Tell us what you can divine of Oliphant’s intent. I have a feeling you’ll twist yourself into knots avoiding the obvious.

  41. JD says:

    Kirk is an imbecile, and clearly did not read any of the links that accompanied the post.

  42. Jeff G. says:

    I’m consistently amazed at these wannabe hipsters who bash Sly and the Family Stone.

  43. blowhard says:

    Relevant:

    “Stand!
    They will try to make you crawl
    And they know what you’re saying makes sense and all
    Stand!”

  44. Alec Leamas says:

    “Could you guys pass a list of the sorts of people who can criticize Israeli policies to the Post.”

    Well, you see, that’s just it – they’ve picked Israel out for extra-special treatment, or “criticism” for reasons that should be apparent. There is no similar solidarity with the Kurds, and criticism of the several Nations that violently oppress their resident populations. One could pick example after example of the brutality of other Nations in a single week which far outstrip, merely as a matter of proportion, all of the colorable claims against the State of Israel from its beginnings to present that never find their way into the New York Times or Oliphant’s tedious funny papers.

    “Why Israel?” is a valid question that you seem to ignore as a matter of course.

  45. ushie says:

    Yeah, Kirk, those poor widdle Palis, who only ever kill Israelis, and one another, by total accident.

    You do know they authorized crucifixion as a punishment in Paliland, right?

  46. Lamontyoubigdummy says:

    That Star of David Shark thingy made me think of some of the silly special effects renderings in “Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou.”

    Steve would totally dynamite that Star of David Shark thingy if it tried to eat Esteban…or Ned, uh, I mean, Kingsly.

    I wonder if it feeds on Florescent Snapper.

    Or just “Gazans.”

  47. pdbuttons says:

    don’t call me…
    nigger/whitey
    love the fur boots on jonny carson
    hi-yo
    iffn’ some smartypants has the propa quote
    i take my toy battle bot off field
    and swing low..
    sweetie

  48. Mostly, I think of somebody’s fist upside Oliphant’s head as I do Dr. Johnson’s foot to the stone.

    Or maybe a Doc Martens boot to Oliphant’s stones.

    Hey, Sdferr: ever run across a book called Boswell’s Clap? I know it only by rumor, but it’s supposed to dish plenty of dirt on Dr. J. and his groupie Boz.

  49. Cowboy says:

    Is it just me, or did anyone else have to check the date and place of publication on that cartoon?

    Seriously, how can anyone publish that and NOT recognize its inherent anti-Semitism?

  50. Sdferr says:

    Never have SBP.

  51. pdbuttons says:

    boots
    check aroo i’m all on it
    shins
    glad u asked-got my bobby orr future shin pads
    garters- oh-p’shaw!
    cup?
    cup?
    atheletic support?
    don’t need ’em
    republicans ain’t got no balls no how

    clem? u say?
    “a- ya”

  52. guinsPen says:

    a…
    a…
    a…cheevers

  53. Sdferr says:

    Devils go down tomorrow night. Down they go, think it with me pens, down to defeat.

  54. happyfeet says:

    Shitting on Jews after actively campaigning for that piece of shit what worshiped in that Jew-hating church for twenty years is about the most gratuitous thing I can imagine a newspaper doing in Barack Obama’s America in 2009. The Washington Post needs to hold someone accountable cause this Oliphant hate speech is same as Stormfront I think as far as the level of sophistication it appeals to. What did Howard Kurtz have to say about this?

  55. They’ll be joining the Chicago Sun-Times and Tribune soon, ‘feets.

    ‘Cause Barky spreads a happy economy wherever he goes.

  56. guinsPen says:

    Devils go down tomorrow night.

    Even with Satan down at Wilkes-Barre/Scranton, done.

  57. pdbuttons says:

    i don’t
    whatever
    bruin be #1 stat wise
    but…
    broduer be sweet/
    plus the fucking canadiens
    i hate[disluike] em
    should be fun!
    btw/ deeetroit yzerman was the greatest
    also joe sakic
    pat roy

    and… give it to me…
    give it….

    3

  58. Rusty says:

    #37
    Thanks Lamont. Coffee all over the keyboard.

  59. B Moe says:

    Who was that Russian played for the Red Wings that got fucked up in the limo crash, buttons? Best open ice hitter I ever saw.

  60. B Moe says:

    Konstantinov. Total bad ass.

  61. LE says:

    What does the Washington Post have to do with this? Oliphant is a syndicated cartoonist. The Post has its own editorial cartoonist (Tom Toles). They occasionally run syndicated material on the weekend, but, to my knowledge, this cartoon did not appear in the Post. Does anyone have reason to think otherwise?

  62. happyfeet says:

    This cartoon appeared in the anti-semitic dirty socialist Washington Post. What hates Jews. Jew-hating dirty socialist propagandists.

  63. happyfeet says:

    Most American institutions what adapt European affectations like socialisms and artisanal cheese hate Jews. It’s a thing.

  64. Sdferr says:

    Radosh’s original link to the WaPo seems to yield a 404 now. Means the WaPo pulled it, I take it?

  65. happyfeet says:

    I think so. I don’t think the syndicator can pull something once it’s out there.

  66. happyfeet says:

    I don’t know that for sure though.

  67. Sdferr says:

    Using the search marked current here, they’ve got 404’s for both March 25 and March 24, but not for any dates further back.

  68. alppuccino says:

    That Oliphant dude seems like a real dick.

  69. pdbuttons says:

    i just remember larianov/ markhov
    and…hey moe- shemp ov
    konstantinov was defence?-he was a bad man
    ya…
    and oh lordy
    tretiak

Comments are closed.