[…] The LA Times compares Hillary to prose and Obama to poetry; Andrew declares the argument “solid.” Concrete poetry? Arse poetica? Do you accept this dialectical materialization from one who’s been accused of gauziness? […]
Maybe he meant ‘gaussian’. Like ‘as stupid as a mindless electric field’, or ‘controlled by forces outside his environment’, or ‘ugly like a person shaped like a gaussian sphere’.
Gauzy is NOT homophobic, and yes I’m a Barack. I have never understood why
the gay and lesbian community always default to the Clintons
when either of them enters a political race.
Is gauzy the new poofy?
That’s the question, Darleen. Can’t wait for Gleen to weigh in.
MUMMY-PHOBE!!!
[…] that’s funny, see? Posted by Dan Collins @ 2:04 pm | Trackback Share […]
[…] Dan’s post on Rick Perlstein’s “Getting Past the ’60s? It’s Not Going to […]
I would have gone with flimsy as opposed to gauzy.
I would have gone with shirtliftery, or gerbilcaveish.
[…] The LA Times compares Hillary to prose and Obama to poetry; Andrew declares the argument “solid.” Concrete poetry? Arse poetica? Do you accept this dialectical materialization from one who’s been accused of gauziness? […]
Rick Perlstein characterizes Andrew Sullivan as “gauzy.â€Â
Well, in his defense, he didn’t say ‘girlzy’…
Sure it wasn’t “gassy”? He’s definitely gassy.
Maybe he meant ‘gaussian’. Like ‘as stupid as a mindless electric field’, or ‘controlled by forces outside his environment’, or ‘ugly like a person shaped like a gaussian sphere’.
It’s possible. Typos happen all the time.
Hahaha! I would actually say swishy more. Never hear of the term gauzy.
I think he’s gauzy; the way he openly expresses his support for Obama.
Gauzy is NOT homophobic, and yes I’m a Barack. I have never understood why
the gay and lesbian community always default to the Clintons
when either of them enters a political race.