After which, I plan to sue the range for allowing me to fire in a dangerous environment that, in addition to allowing guns, gets too loud and too full of lead. And that makes me feel a bit cramped when I choose to try a 360-degree spinning shot from an automated wheelchair. Ain’t America great?
June 2012
Boom!
Sure, it’s no Scooter Libby having the temerity to remember differently than Tim Russert. But still.
In my inbox: “Judge Roberts’ decision forces Americans to stand on their own two feet — and that’s a good thing”
I’m not going to critique the whole thing — you’re free to do so, just as you’re free to agree with the arguments on offer — though I will say generally that what I want in a SCOTUS Justice is not a new Daddy or Mommy. I don’t need life lessons. I don’t want someone who crusades for “social justice.” I don’t need tough love. I don’t need — and
Commerce Clause status quo
Mark Levin: […] A number of politicians and commentators are claiming that the Supreme Court in the Obamacare case “limited” the reach of the commerce clause, i.e., five justices held that individuals cannot be mandated to buy insurance under the commerce clause. Actually, the five justices did not limit anything. They simply did not accept the Obama administration’s ridiculous argument that inactivity is commerce. The status quo stands because Obamacare
What I learned watching “Rizzoli and Isles”
Did you know that frakking pumps thousands of chemicals — I know, right? chemicals! — into the virgin earth, resulting in massive water pollution and, if the show is to be believed, the murders of concerned and goodly environmentalists who, in a selfless effort to save the planet (and at great personal risk, so deeply runs both their convictions and their obvious selfless goodliness), uncover charlatans on private land engaging
“White House Statement on Obamacare Mandate Tax Contradicts Supreme Court Ruling”
It’s a penalty. Duh. According to press reports, White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters aboard Air Force One that the penalty was not a tax but a penalty. “It’s a penalty, because you have a choice. You don’t have a choice to pay your taxes, right,” Carney is quoted as saying by Yahoo News. In a 5-4 ruling issued just one day before, Chief Justice John Roberts stated that
Subjects / verb disagreement
Remember: She is your better, this silly dried up old fig in her crony-bought finery and patchwork spackle, stretch, plump, and tuck. She is your lord and she is your ruler. So suck it up, comrades. Eat your peas. (h/t sdferr)
Let me address this idea that John Roberts bravely and with humility saved the Court and the Union — all while fashioning a cunning victory for classical liberalism and federalism
Notes McGehee in the comments: Even if all the silver-lining guys are right, the best that can be said for what Roberts did is, he gamed the ruling to help bring about a desired political outcome. If a 5-4 ruling striking down ObamaCareTax would have been a blow to the Court’s legitimacy, what does that make this? Exactly. I am sick to death of the pollyanna GOP beta males who’ll
Barry Hussein Obama’s magical unicorn ride to Socialist Utopia, day 1
When I woke this morning and looked outside my office window, nothing seemed much changed: on recently watered suburban lawns, American Goldfinches plucked bugs from the space between grass blades, fat rabbits nibbled at the local Fescue pluming up around water main covers, and in the distance I could hear the droning of a riding mower growling its way across prairie grass and patches of goat head and thistle brush,
