Someone has access to my database and so has access to my changes in login info. Whomever it is placed a number of fake advertisements (since removed) — and has now removed a particular post, one containing the following graphic: Curious, that. I wonder if maybe someone with a connection to the new Obama Truth Teams isn’t much in favor of the truth. I know. Shocking.

Yes, I know. We’ve entered Kafka’s world, only with “Gossip Girls” and “Glee” to keep us a bit more distracted. But we get the government we deserve, I suppose. Yes we did!: President Barack Obama listed rising gas prices as among the many reasons to extend the payroll tax cut Tuesday, flanked by individuals the White House promoted as being affected by $40 per paycheck the average American would lose

site is for sale. Final price 200$ update: No, I’m not for sale. To anyone. And that probably pisses you off more than anything, doesn’t it, Mr Hacker?

Stacy McCain: This issue isn’t about employers imposing anything on anybody. It’s about whether the federal government can mandate certain types of insurance coverage for private employers, even to the point of requiring Catholic organizations to pay for insurance that includes full coverage — no deductible, no co-pay — for contraception, sterilization and abortifacient “morning after” drugs. In this battle, the defense of Catholic organizations is actually a libertarian position,

Not sure what the problem is. Wrote the site host and am waiting to hear back.

Ha! NOW we’ve kinda caught his preachy, sanctimonious ass in a kinda baldfaced, hypocritical, very un-Christian LIE! Which means that it’s okay, finally, to support Romney as a conservative and not look at ourselves as big fat fucking sellouts! Rejoice! Here’s the skinny, paraphrased from the scanned newpaper page that’s been helpfully highlighted: Santorum said, in 1990 (and according to this Pittsburgh paper), that he has always opposed government funding

From “yes we can!” to “oh yes they are!” — all in the course of 3 years! From the Weekly Standard blog: “[Obama] supports corporate tax reform that would reduce expenditures and loopholes, lower rates for people investing and creating jobs in the U.S., due so further for manufacturing, and that we need to, as we have the Buffett Rule and the individual tax reform, we need a global minimum

Largely a rhetorical question, of course, because as Sessions knows, the real answer is,”We own the Senate and the Justice Department, you right wing bitch — and you have John Boehner and Mitch McConnell in leadership, for Chrissakes, two guys who are far more likely to put a bar soap-in-the-pillowcase beating on Michele Bachmann than go offensive on this White House. So hell’s no!” But kudos to Sessions for asking

In reply to Gabe Malor’s latest attempt to level the GOP primary playing field by tearing Rick Santorum down to the Romney level of electoral weathervaning — Malor’s hope being that if he can only show that no actual conservative candidates remain, stupid flyover hicktard TEA Party hypocrites will do what’s right and embrace the most telegenic (and socially moderate) of the remaining candidates to run against Barack Obama —

From “Hope and Change” to “Hope, but Keep Trying the Same Shit That Won’t Work No Matter How Many Times We Insist It Will If We Just Give It Another Chance.” Which, that doesn’t have quite the same easy bumpersticker grace to it, seems to me. James Pethokoukis: […] Obama’s new budget isn’t about economic growth or cutting debt or creating a “built to last” economy. The Obama campaign is