#attackwatch: I’m unclear if this article on how attackwatch has become an internet joke is considered an attack on Dear Leader, or just an attack on #attackwatch. At any rate, I thought you should know about it. To help stop the HATE!
September 2011
"Worse and worse: New e-mails show White House rushed OMB to approve Solyndra loan"
Well, sure. But Democrats have offered a convincing rejoinder: “Uh… BIG SOLAR! And, you know, Bush!” **** @attackwatch: Bush and Solyndra corporate fatcats misled Obama into bad green jobs investment. I say we burn them. Thoughts? Matches…? (thanks to JD)
"Waxman: Jews May Vote Against Obama Because 'They Feel They Want to Protect Their Wealth'"
It’s okay. Waxman’s a Jew, so he can say such things. Jews who only tolerate those Jews who vote the right way — namely, for leftist Democrats, who are mostly anti-Israel self-hating secularists pretending compassion by doling out other people’s money (the control of which wealth they want to protect) — are an established part of our ethnic landscape. The real question is, does my pointing it out constitute an
"Authors of Social Security Believed It Was Unconstitutional"
Of course, the only reality is some combination of perception and received truths, so, you know — what the hell, right? Terence Jeffrey, CNS: Mitt Romney may believe Social Security is constitutional, but he would have a hard time convincing some of the people who pushed the Social Security Act into law. As I wrote in my book, “Control Freaks,” some of the main players involved in creating Social Security
@attackwatch
Not sure if this counts, but I just watched a hobo eating an Oreo, and the filth of such heavy-handed symbolism convinced me to beat him with a length of rebar. Good, or is that an overreaction? Please advise.
Understanding NY-9
Conventional wisdom is that the election is a repudiation of Obama and his policies; Michael Barone says the rebuke is to Chuck Schumer, by way of Anthony Wiener’s Anthony’s wiener; still others insist that a social wedge issue, namely, repudiation of the re-definition of marriage, played an important role; and then there’s the Democrat party spokesperson Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, who is telling us that NY-9 has always been a difficult district
Is nothing sacred?
It’s bad enough Hollywood remade Planet of the Apes. And The Omen. And what they did to Bad News Bears they should never, ever, ever be forgiven for. The Mechanic remake? Why? Walking Tall? Again, why? And now this, which, frankly, may just be the worst insult of all… Or, well, the second worse.
"The Great Obama Welfare State"
To be clear: The following statistics are all a form of archconservative Visigothery, and as such I find them invasive and unhelpful and wish they would just shut up, being fundamentally unelectable and extreme: Government dependence, which is defined as the percentage of persons receiving one or more federal benefit payments, is at a staggering 47%, its highest level in American history, while 21 million households are reliant on food
the "pass this bill! Pass it now!"-tribute post, ironized and repackaged as a local metaphor
“TEBOW, TEBOW, TEBOW!”, etc.
I don't know why it is…
…but these kinds of stories — of petty tyrannies and civic bullying — really chap my sack. One of the things I disagree with Mark Levin most strongly about is his knee-jerk lionization of law enforcement officers, whom he refers to as “better than the rest of us.” Some may be (and probably are). But others are not. And many are worse than the average Gap clerk or insurance salesman.