Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

May 2011
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Archives

May 22, 2011

The wretched Jew-controlled media (and their banker enablers, no doubt) wrongly and unconscionably spun Barack Obama's very very pro-Israel speech to make it seem like his calling on the Jews to surrender Jerusalem and the Christian Holy sites to a cabal of proto-Nazis who, in addition to refusing to recognize the right of Israel to exist, have sworn to exterminate them, was somehow not the the demonstrably pro-Israel, pro-peace bit of superb statemanship and leadership it most clearly was

— At least, that’s the new spin coming from the leftist sharks and at least one “rightwing” Trig truther who clings to their bellies like some hirsute drug-addled Remora. And if you think about it, a lot of people did immediately conclude that Obama and his talk of a “contiguous” Palestinian state, which is to be made possible by Israel’s relinquishing of the buffer land it uses to guard against

Double Down at AIPAC

Because I’m assuming there’s at least one person who has the President’s ear who knows what “contiguous” means, I’m going to conclude that what is happening here is that Israel is being set up — that when they are inevitably attacked (likely, following a September UN declaration that the Palestinians “deserve” a state, and that that state should come at the expense of some of Israel’s land, as opposed to

"Mitch Daniels says 'No' to 2012 Republican presidential bid, citing family objections"

Karl Rove, the Bushes, and most of the fellas at National Review wept. The truth is, at some other moment in time, Daniels may have made a good GOP candidate. But this is an election where, win or lose, conservatives have to make their case and present a clear, unambiguous, and unapologetic defense of liberty, individualism, free market capitalism, natural rights, and the rule of law proceeding from the Constitution.