So long as we’re talking about code words and “who decides” what interpretation is best, let me add a few points to help combat the creeping fascism that comes with certain ideas about how language works. To do so, let me quote from an example left in the comments to a post at Patterico’s that seeks to explain to us “What words mean”: Words not only mean different things in
March 2009
Advocacy [Dan Collins]
One of the things that’s going on in the posts below, dealing with interpretation and signification and intention, is that people are asking, “Who is to judge?” And that’s an interesting question, for all of us. On the part of the left, of course, that is the person who is most aggrieved, by and large, which is a matter apart from who is victimized, although that distinction seems a bit
More on Code Words [Dan Collins]
Over at American Power, Donald Douglas has up a post that places in historical perspective the amoral anti-seriousness of the left. What amazes me is that they will search for hidden meanings in code words for their ideological opponents at home, while rationalizing and apologizing for the forthright and unequivocal statements of hatred towards our allies and intended harm towards us they find among our enemies abroad. Also, Madoff’s willing
Second Afterlife [Dan Collins]
You know, I’d never really thought of this: When Jerald Spangenberg collapsed and died in the middle of a quest in an online game, his daughter embarked on a quest of her own: to let her father’s gaming friends know that he hadn’t just decided to desert them. It wasn’t easy, because she didn’t have her father’s “World of Warcraft” password and the game’s publisher couldn’t help her. Eventually, Melissa
Context, Interpretation and Intention [Dan Collins]
I’m hoping this is something Jeff will address. This Dyson guy is disgustingly suggesting that black conservatives are colonized by the discourse of the Other, and essentially ventriloquists’ dummies. Code words. Civility NOW!!! Is “racist” a code word? Does it mean “whitey”? Monkey.
Unfortunate moment in animism, #5
“– But officer, I can assure you that what you refer to as my ‘perverted’ coupling with that fire hydrant was not only tender and meaningful, but completely consensual, to boot…”
Digital Publius: Obama’s Gifts to Brown “Ghetto” [Dan Collins]
And if I were differently melanized, I’d agree with him. Then again, maybe I just don’t understand urban affairs the way Monica Conyers and Adolpho Carrion do. Via Dan Riehl: Cartoon Obama, bankers at your beck, wonder how you’ll manage to wreck the rest. (aka Captain O!merdica) Faustina lente: Mark Joey Hairplugs’ words, he’ll be tested early on. Fellow OUTLAW criticized, marginalized. Breitbart goes OUTLAW on Maher.
Yes, there was another Iowahawk post here moments ago…
But I removed it. Iowahawk’s cool and all, but three posts plus all those breathless email updates is plenty enough, and there’s really only so much space one blog should devote to Iowahawk that isn’t called, y’know — Iowahawk.
The Fruitiness of Jon Stewart [Dan Collins]
From the comments in the previous thread, happyfeet: Jon Stewart is smug. It’s like an I’m a tv bimbo ha ha and you’re not sort of smug. But if he for real doesn’t know that he’s the Cramer of politics butcept on a less prestigious channel then his agent just hasn’t been honest with him I don’t think. That’s sad cause I feel like Mr. Stewart is foreclosing personal growth
Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins]
and an appreciation of Brooksie Frumdreher III:
