Michelle Malkin on Sarah Palin’s use of a tanning bed in Alaska hacking, identity theft, intimidation, and Gawker’s gleeful presentation of the stolen property. I won’t link to Gawker — at least, not until they run a piece on Nick Denton being frogmarched to federal prison; but if there’s anything positive that may come out of this, it’s that we may now find out how capable the government is at

WaPo: North Korea has tested the engine mechanism for an intercontinental missile that might be able to hit major cities on the U.S. West Coast, according to an account published Tuesday in the South Korean press. A previously unknown missile launch site on the west coast of North Korea was identified last week by Jane’s Defense Weekly, which cited commercial satellite images. The facility has a mobile launch pad and

Richard Miniter, “What if Obama loses?” [To the Dem base] Obama is much more than Kerry could ever be. Obama’s biography is straight out of a Democratic dream factory; his being touches and excites every element of the vast and varied Democratic party coalition. He and his wife are activist lawyers; he is connected to both the 1960s radicals (Ayers et al) and the Daley Democrats who beat them up

     “What are those, behind the reeds? Are those ducks?”      Billy didn’t hesitate. “Without a doubt. Ducks.” finis

John Lott: The current mortgage crisis arose because loans were made with virtually nonexistent underwriting standards. There was no verification of income or assets, little assurance of the ability to pay the mortgage, and little or no down payment. So, with rules like these, who wouldn’t have expected defaults? In January, the Federal Reserve stepped in proposing strict regulations on what conditions should be met before loans would be allowed.

Scott Swett and Roger Canfield, writing in the American Thinker: The lack of media interest in the role of former domestic terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn in Democratic nominee Barack Obama’s political ascent in Chicago is one of the most remarkable aspects of the 2008 presidential campaign. When the question is raised at all, reporters are quick to repeat Sen. Obama’s claim that his relationship with the two former

Bless MSNBC. Even when the jig is up, the still look for the silver lining. In this case, note the headline: “Palin unlikely to meet ‘Troopergate’ investigator”. Subtextual questions / obligatory reaction pose, for those on the skim: Why not? What does she have to hide? I’M OUTRAGED!” But were you to, like, read the article, certain things jump out at you. For instance: The presidential campaign of Sen. John

Hockey Moms Against Palin: “She betrayed us in the past. How can we trust her now?” If the people who served alongside her won’t vouch for her, how can we? Food for thought, people. A big ‘ol macaroni and ground beef casserole for thought, even… (h/t suzynjoe)

…Provided, of course, you’re able to bracket all that, you know — sameness… September 16, 2008: “Streisand to Perform at Hollywood Fundraiser for Obama” November 27, 2007: “Streisand Endorses Clinton” June 26, 2004: “Streisand Sings for Kerry” August 10, 2000: “Ms. Streisand will also lend her cachet to Mr. Gore’s campaign, headlining a concert at the Shrine Auditorium next Thursday that is expected to raise at least $2.5 million for