If McCain and that part of the GOP who saw this coming don’t get out in front of this credit mess and start hammering away at the blame game the Dems and their media myrmidons are pushing, we could conceivably end up with the lunatics in charge of the asylum. Or, to put it another way, clear the sidewalk: we need space for bread lines, baby!: It was a room
September 19, 2008
“The Fannie Mae Gang”
Others have mentioned this July piece by Paul Gigot — which includes links to other WSJ pieces, as well as to response pieces from Raines, Rep Oxley, and Sen Conrad — so I figured I’d link it here for posterity’s sake. The meat and potatoes: Freddie’s accounting fiasco became public in 2003, while Fannie’s accounting blew up in 2004. Mr. Raines was forced to resign, and a report by regulator
Erasure
It’s not just an infuriatingly monotonous eighties angst band anymore. Physics question: just how deep can one dig the memory hole before burrowing through the entirety of the earth and resurfacing in China? And once there, how will China’s own memory hole react to the sudden appearance of its western equal — mini black hole? Or the sudden, spontaneous erection of Disneyland Beijing, built from nothing but magma and the
Democratic Presidential Hopeful Barack Obama and 70s Kung-fu expert and counterculture icon Billy Jack discuss the social construction of race and how it obtains in the current electoral climate, 2
“What people don’t seem to realize, Mr Billy Jack, is that those of us who’ve felt the sting of racism can recognize it by its very timbre. White people seem to think they can hide their fear of the black man in subtle turns of phrase or situational metaphors. But what they don’t realize is that those of us who’ve studied America’s racist history are able to decode such timorous
Rush to judgment: intentionalism vs. progressive will to power
As Obama learns poststructuralist iteration and differance, Rush Limbaugh fires back by invoking intentionalism. It is progressivism and its linguistic assumptions — consensus interpretation and manufacted consent, deployed cynically to create new “meanings” in new “contexts” — vs. a coherent linguistic system in which meaning, for purposes of interpretation (rather than, say, the kind “re-imagining” the Obama campaign engages in here), must necessarily appeal to the creator of the signs:
