There has been wall-to-wall commentary on Ms. Marcotte lately, and I can’t possibly follow it all, so if someone has already addressed this, I apologize.
One thing I vow here and now–you motherfuckers who want to ban birth control will never sleep. I will fuck without making children day in and out and you will know it and you won’t be able to stop it. Toss and turn, you mean, jealous motherfuckers. I’m not going to be “punished†with babies. Which makes all your efforts a failure. Some non-procreating women escaped. So give up now. You’ll never catch all of us. Give up now.
Out of all of the bilge that Amanda “Fuck’em if they can’t take a joke” Marcotte has spewed, I find this the most–well, ok, the only–interesting quote from her. Now, the idea that women support abortion “rights” because they don’t want to deal with the consequences of sex may be obvious to most of you, but it’s pretty rare that a lefty will come right out and admit it, especially so, um, forcefully. It’s almost refreshing. Btw Mandy, if you’re reading this, and I know you are, I love angry women. Call me.
This is really the crux of the biscuit for the Left. You can see angry lefties spitting venom any day of the week on a variety of subjects. Bush? Nutso. Capitalism? Smash Starbucks! But if you want to see someone absolutely go off the deep end, just say something that can be taken by a lefty to mean that you want to restrict his or her sex life in some way. They look like marionettes having a coke seizure. It’s so important to them that are willing to make the monstrous moral calculation that it trumps innocent life.
So the next time you’re arguing the abortion issue with some libtard who’s employing the same old obfuscatory, high-flown arguments, silently thank Ms. Marcotte and say, “Ahhh, you’d just rather kill a baby so you can fuck without making children day in and day out. Fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck.”
You’ve been watching Reservoir Dogs again, haven’t you?
Who the hell actually wants to ban birth control (I mean, among anyone who’s actually taken seriously)?
That’s a nice strawman she’s got there; maybe she can fuck it sometime.
There’s lot’s more good stuff here.
She quotes the lyrics to Ministry’s “Stigmata” to make her point? That’s just wierd. Even for a lefty.
On the other hand, if she was a 90’s goth chick you know she put out.
Set to video here.
CraigC, is there a reference is the post about abortion equallingy birth control? If so, and your post equates the two, then she does seem a bit unhinged.
If not, and she is referring to birth control in general, then bless her. If she doesn’t want children, then I say it’s a good thing she won’t have them.
As for Alex’s point, there is a large organization in this country that opposes all birth control. Further, many right wing Christian and Muslim organizations (worldwide) oppose birth control education and dissemination of birth control products. Hell, peep out the opposition to the “morning after pill” in this country.
Lastly, it hasn’t even been 40 years since Griswold v Connecticut. In that case the Supreme Court struck down a Connecticut law which forbade even married people from taking birth control. It was one of the reasons Robert Bork was defeated (he said it was the wrong decision) and one of the featured questions to CJ Roberts during his confirmation.
It’s nice to know that some people treat it as a fantasy, but it is a more recent happening in this country than the Civil Rights Act, the beginning of Vietnam, or the assassination of JFK. Four decades is just not that long ago.
Timmyb,
Griswold v Connecticut was wrongly decided.
And I say that as an atheist libertarian.
So, go fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck yourself.
“Libertarian” and oppose Griswold??????????
In the words of Inigo Montoya from Princess Bride: “I do not think that word means what you think it does.”
Nonetheless, being 40 years behind jurisprudence must be swell.
Give us a dissertation on Roe, and Lawrence v Texas, oh, what the hell, Korematsu, or ex Parte Quirin. Let’s hear the limit on government in your libertarian world…
Last figures I saw, which was years ago when I gave a fuck about the abortion issue, said less than 1% of abortions performed in the U.S. are for reasons other than birth control.
So, was she talking about abortion or birth control. We’ve established waht Craig is talking about
Simple: decentralization of power.
Griswold, Roe, Lawrence and a couple hundred others were each a nail in the coffin of decentralized government. Each further confirmed the aggrandizement of the power of the central government at the expense of the local. Centralization is the greatest threat to liberty.
I realize that these are big words for you, timmy, so take your time. Breathe. Shut the fuck up for a while. Breathe some more. Take a couple of days off before you feel the need to respond.
Jesus H. Christ. I considered putting a caveat in there for the precise reason that I knew some fucktard troll would try to hijack the point of the post by harping on some meaningless detail or distinction LIKE THEY ALWAYS DO.
Timmy, you effing MO-ron: I understand perfectly well that she was talking about birth control. One issue is an extension of the other. The birth control issue is one of the gateway issues, if you will, to the abortion question. Libs fight over it because they don’t want ANYTHING that might lead to an undermining of their logically indefensible arguments for abortion. That’s why they’re willing to make a stand on even such a disgusting thing as pulling a baby halfway out of its mother and sucking its brains out with a vacuum device.
LET THIS BE THE END OF THIS DISTRACTION ARGUMENT. If you want to address the point I was making with some sort of substantive, logical argument, please do. (Heh. I offer that because I know you can’t.)
Your posts are entertaining, but your comments are more so! People are cussin’ at each other left and right (and libertarian) and you’re not doing a thing to stop it! Good for you!
as for this, I’m glad she’s not planning on procreating. It makes me sleep better at night, actually.
(*)>
Is there ANYBODY on earth who thinks it’s a bad thing that Amaddog doesn’t want kids? Me? I think it’s a blessing that her genes will die with her.
As for Alex’s point, there is a large organization in this country that opposes all birth control.
What “large organization” is that—could you please be more specific? I know of a couple of “large organizations” that are “opposed” to birth control for their own members on moral grounds—the Catholic and Mormon churches—but neither one is making any serious political effort that I’ve heard about to pass laws to actually ban it for everybody else.
I don’t mean just restricting some forms of birth control, like abortion or the morning-after pill. Neither do I mean efforts to limit the handing out of condoms in junior high schools or prescribing of the Pill to teenage girls without parental notification. I mean, is there any serious, credible political effort going on anywhere in this country to, as Marcotte put it, “ban birth control”—i.e. outlaw the Pill, outlaw condoms, outlaw spermicidal products, diaphragms, etc.? That would be news to me.
I just can’t get past the thought of her having sex. And it’s not a pretty thought.
If that’s true, nikkolai, turn in your Guy Card immediately. Dude, haven’t you ever heard of beer and paper bags?
Why do I get the feeling that in her formative years Amanda watched Logan’s Run while reading ‘Our Bodies, Ourselves’.
–
– Let my small contribution focus on the promise of lack of Marcotte spawn, pushed to the next even happier level, that anticipates: One nice thing about SecProgs is their insistance on being self exterminating.
I think she was talking about her strap-on and Mr. Faletti, Timmah!
Then again, I could be wrong.
Mormons are not opposed to contraception, just abortion. We are also not opposed to in vitro and other fertility treatments.
Just abortion.
You’ll need two of them, in case hers comes off.
The truth is, her incredible hatred as shown in her writing is what really turns me off. I’ve seen a lot worse.
And I’m no prize either.
Why do leftards harp on about democracy yet insist on using the blackrobe people to rule by decree?
The bad thing: She says the F-word a lot.
The good thing: She isn’t spawning offspring.
Craig, about the beer and paper bags – as The Bowler’s daughter ( did she have a real superhero name) said in “Mystery Men”:
“There is not enough beer in the world”.
And until I discovered a supplier of Mil-spec, stainless-steel reinforced Kevlar and carbon fiber ‘paper’ bags, I wouldn’t take the chance.
This is the only photo I’ve seen. Not much of a photo, but from what I can see, I’d do her. No paper bags required.
Beauty is skin deep; ugliness goes clear to the bone.
If her writing can be taken as an indication, she is one ugly person regardless of what she looks like.
I don’t think Amanda’s all that difficult to look at, although, like Cranky, I wouldn’t be in any position to talk if she were.
But the vehemence with which she proclaims her love of the Sacrament of Abortion is kind of scary to people who don’t consider children the equivalent of a deadly fungus. I have seven kids, and I get disturbed by people like Amanda who (a) are proud of having no children and (b) despise mine for being little right-wing-hicks-in-training.
Holy shit, Joel! You rock, you walking spermatazoan!
They’re all with the same woman, and they live under the same roof and stuff, right?
But, geez, no wonder you’ve got 7 kids
They’re all with the same woman, and they live under the same roof and stuff, right?
I wish I could say so. It’s a “yours, mine and ours” thing, with one grown and moved out and another living with his demon-spawn mother. Originally I had two (with different mothers), my wife had three, and then we’ve had two more together. I may not have engendered them all, but by God, I’ve raised ‘em all! (One as a single parent.) All of which puts me ahead of St. Amanda of the Shriveled Ovaries any day, sneer though she may.
I’d be afraid that thing was packed with razor blades and claymores. I’m OK with throwing the old seed pump here and there, but when all is said and done, I expect to get it back. They don’t make rubbers thick enough to inspire enough confidence in me to drop my sausage in a steaming pile of hate like that. An if they did, what would be the point?
No nasty for me thanks, and that’s all she’s got.
I know you like me (I know you like me)
I know you do (I know you do)
Thats why whenever I come around shes all over you
And I know you want it (I know you want it)
It’s easy to see (it’s easy to see)
And in the back of your mind
I know you should be home with me
[Chorus]
Dont cha wish your girlfriend was hot like me
Dont cha wish your girlfriend was a freak like me
Dont cha, dont cha
Dont cha wish your girlfriend was raw like me
Dont cha wish your girlfriend was fun like me
Dont cha, dont cha
You males are wise to fear the power of my vagina. It has teeth and is not afraid to use them.
Count me with Nikkolai and the others. Mine stands with pride, secure in the knowledge of precisely where it has been and has not been.
tw: within57, not quite, but a gentleman really shouldn’t say more.
We have a winner.
Give Amanda points for being game enough to show up here!
Just as I suspected. That is why I was planning on doing her in the ass.
Just as I suspected. That is why I was planning on doing her in the ass.
This is getting ungentlemanly. I hate to see this thread sink to Amanda’s level of discourse.