From the Financial Times:
Iran will be able to develop enough weapons-grade material for a nuclear bomb and there is little that can be done to prevent it, an internal European Union document has concluded.
In an admission of the international community’s failure to hold back Iran’s nuclear ambitions, the document –- compiled by the staff of Javier Solana, EU foreign policy chief –- says the atomic programme has been delayed only by technical limitations rather than diplomatic pressure. “Attempts to engage the Iranian administration in a negotiating process have not so far succeeded,†it states.
Hmm. Perhaps they simply aren’t trying hard enough, or you know—using the right “carrots.” Or else, Bush’s cowboy posturing is making it impossible for Iran to come to the table in good faith. Though they’d certainly like to.
Having the American military in Iraq certainly isn’t helping things, either. Plus, EuroDisney and Cinemax After Dark?—abominations that, like Israel, simply must be destroyed in an atomic burst of hellfire, Allah willing. Because of the western economic colonialism underpinning in the entire sham edifice of “globalization” and such.
Have I forgotten anything? Because if we’re satisfied to sit by and let things spiral out of control, it’s always best have a set of excuses to trot out on the backend, I’ve found.
The downbeat conclusions of the “reflection paper†–- seen by the Financial Times –- are certain to be seized on by advocates of military action, who fear that Iran will be able to produce enough fissile material for a bomb over the next two to three years. Tehran insists its purposes are purely peaceful.
“At some stage we must expect that Iran will acquire the capacity to enrich uranium on the scale required for a weapons programme,†says the paper, dated February 7 and circulated to the EU’s 27 national governments ahead of a foreign ministers meeting yesterday.
“In practice . . . the Iranians have pursued their programme at their own pace, the limiting factor being technical difficulties rather than resolutions by the UN or the International Atomic Energy Agency.
“The problems with Iran will not be resolved through economic sanctions alone.â€Â
So. What to make of this? Does this give the US and Israel the tacit go-ahead to pull the military option off the table in order to dress it Kevlar and give its very own chair and a big plate of carbs?
Writes Allahpundit:
Letting Iran have the bomb means letting the Saudis and Egyptians have it, too, since the U.S. isn’t about to line up against the Sunnis any more so than we’ve already done in Iraq. Israel can’t afford proliferation in the Middle East and the Sunni governments probably aren’t all that hot for the idea either given the threat they face from jihadis, so if it comes to the point where attacking is the only solution, the IAF will play deus ex machina. Or rather, they’ll try to.
But we’re not there yet.
Just as it is certain Iran is actively meddling in Iraq, it is equally certain that US Special Forces have penetrated Iran and gathered whatever intel is necessary to create a workable plan for throttling—even if only temporarily—Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The difference being that the Iranians aren’t constrained to act by the braying of their political dissidents.
Which is to say, with people like Wes Clark shrieking from the sidelines that any attack on Iran will only serve to prove that our government has been usurped by a shadowy cabal of monied New York Jews, and with member members of the Democratic Congress stepping over each other to appear more anti-war than the next (cf John Edward’s recent rhetorical contortions on his Iran position, in which the presidential hopeful was whipped by the netroots into walking back erstwhile muscular rhetoric in favor of unintelligible pap), the chances of a strong US military maneuver are slim. Hell, even a cluster of Republican politicos are so worried about polls that they’d happily to kick the can down the road a bit, if doing so would assuage those suffering from war fatigue and keep the GOP puffed shirts in the good graces of the voting public.
Leadership being overrated when you can have power instead.
Sadly, Iran’s greatest ally is western public opinion—tethered as it is to a completely neutered and feckless EU and UN and an international press that is largely hostile to Israel. And the mullahs know it.
Which reminds me: did the sight of Diane Sawyer interviewing Achmanidinejihad on “Good Morning America” this morning—her head dutifully wrapped in a scarf while the Iranian president rebuked her again and again for interrupting –make anyone else a little bit queasy? Particularly when Diane came away from the interview noting that the big fella’ seems to have softened his stance somewhat on that whole rain of hellfire thing, allowing that it is up to the “Palestinians” whether Israel be granted permission to exist?
Why, what good news! Back to you, Robin!
But who knows. Maybe I’m just one of those serial bedwetters. Perhaps the next strongly worded condemnation from the EU will cause the mullahs to blink. Then, we can all go back to our dreams of universal healthcare, and President Obama can teach us all how to overcome our hatred for the brown man.
President Obama? Wait’ll you see the pulvarized, bloody pulp of his carcass once HillBillary comes a’ callin’.
Didn’t Mossad have a little something to do with the Iranian nuclear scientist death? How bout a little of that magic on the Dinnerjacket guy?
I’m convinced that Europe is fully prepared to shake its head sadly and write a few letters if Iran nukes Israel from end to end. They might even have trade sanctions for a year or so.
And secretly, they’d shrug and move on, glad to have THAT little problem off their hands.
And the Guardian would editorialize that it was sad, but Israel asked for it, by insisting on, you know, existing.
The European Union is intentionally misleading us in a rush to war with no plan to keep the peace. I’m not saying they’re lying, but I don’t think they’re being truthful. But don’t get me wrong…I will be glad if the nukular capability of Iran is eliminated. I just get fussy when I want it to appear I wasn’t told the truth…or something like that. Must…twist…more…
Is that the link you wanted for “kick the can down the road a bit” … ?
“Iran on course for nuclear bomb.”
Well, duh.
Upon reflection, the indifference of the West to the slaughter in Rwanda and Darfur has forshadowed and thrown into high relief the reality of its cultural and spiritual death. It has succumbed to hopelessness and despair. The only thing left is for us to recognize this.
I’m preparing for two things: 1) the destruction of most of Israel as leaders in the West stand around making excuses for their inaction and 2) the world war that will result when the idea of acquiescing to our own destruction becomes too much for some of us.
Maybe this will force a re-birth of the West, but we have a lot further to descend before we can rise again.
No. It was supposed to go elsewhere.
The link that is to go in its place, which I can’t find just now, was the Baker Commission Report suggesting we talk with Iran—in between their parliamentary shouts of “Death to America,” presumably.
The EU isn’t even making strongly worded condemnations anymore. They have shrugged and basically said “over to you, Zionists and Imperialist Cowboys….please.”
Being the S-5 of a Sustainment Brigade, I recon I’ll be involved in explaining to the few surviovrs of the eventual nuclear exchange that “we are here to help…now. Sorry ‘bout that.”
At least I won’t have to explain my poor typing skills…
Bismarck is quoted to the effect that God looks out for fools, drunks, and the United States of America. I wonder if our luck is running out?
This post, albeit obliquely, reminds me of Steven den Beste’s strategic overview. In effect, this post updates the reasons for a (still more) muscular policy in the Middle East in general and specifically why Iraq is so important.
I get queasy whenever I see (or even hear about) a western reporter fellating a strongman or a strongman’s mouthpiece. We have reporters declaring that “everything the Bush administration says is a lie” while simultaneously swallowing as gospel everything coming from Ahmanidinejad.
It makes me wonder if they realize how foolish and evil they appear.
Seems like we have two options:
1. Do nothing.
2. Launch an impotent attack on Iran that won’t stop them from getting nukes but will kill thousands of innocent Iranians, make our continued presence in Iraq untenable and make America an international pariah.
Tough call.
No.
No they don’t.
Wow, alphie. I bet you’re not even aware you’ve committed a fallacy with that one.
Idiot.
According to you and your buddy John Kerry and the rest of the ‘progressives’ alphie, the US is already an international pariah.
Also, I love your plan is basically
a. Be a complete pussy
b. Be a complete pussy.
Yes, for those of us not complete pussys, it is a tough call.
No, alpee. Only in your life are you confronted with the options:
1. Do nothing.
2. Do something ineffective and destructive.
That is you projecting your personal problems onto this international security problem.
You don’t have an actual political view, you just have personal problems that color your politics.
It seems you have a constant loop running in your head that says: “If I take action, people won’t like me.”
I believe you hate the Bush administration and particulary the military because their decisiveness and courage in confronting problems is a complete rebuke to the mincing, cowardly way you have always live.
Decisiveness and confidence in others makes you feel bad because it highlights all that you lack and all the chances you missed….
You’ve got a personal problem with confidence and learned passiveness.
Stop taking it out on us.
Actually, I think spelling survivors of a nuclear exchange “surviovrs” is descriptively appropriate.
I’m sure alphie is very decisive in acting if one of two conditions is met:
1. The outcome is 100% guaranteed.
2. The course of action fits his worldview.
Look to the Dixie Chix lyrics for answers to all these questions alphie.
……..look harder.
Iran: Technology 65 years behind ours, Dominant culture 700 years behind ours. What a combination. This is why there’s a Prime Directive on Star Trek (I mean, apart from no cellulite in outer space).
Obviously offensive military action against Iran is risky, esp since the armed forces of the United States are already embroiled in conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, and have numerous other roles worldwide. A “pure” air power action may degrade Iran’s nuclear capability, but it will also have probable effects in the realm of our economy (fuel prices), stability in Iraq (gloves off for the Shi’tes we are supporting), and incidentally probably cause significant collateral damage in Iran which will further degrade the US standing in the world (and that’s not completely irrelevant.)
Therefore the situation re: Iran is serious and there are no easy or simple solutions. It doesn’t help that the American people are not behind the current effort, for a variety of reasons. I have yet to hear a political leader deliver an effective “This is what we gotta do” speech. That is a major failure.
Over the last 5 years I’ve written a number of times about how difficult it is to negotiate the Iran problem.
Once constant? Five years have passed, and things have gotten progressively worse.
Seems like alphie has two options:
1. Do nothing.
2. Launch an impotent attack on Protien Wisdom that won’t stop them from being conservative but will annoy thousands of innocent blog readers, make our continued presence in the comments untenable and make liberals in general an online pariah.
You could substitute just about any situation into alphie’s words and totally get him and how he lives.
The dishes need to be washed.
Well, it looks like we have two options.
1. Do nothing.
2. Launch an impotent attack on the dirty dishes that won’t stop them from being dirty again but will keep me from commenting on PW, make the dishes continued presence in the sink untenable and make food in general an clean dish pariah.
Man, that is brilliant.
Gray,
This is not a joke.
If we launch and unprovoked attack on Iran, we better be prepared to go it alone in the world.
No more oil.
No more foreign credit.
No more markets for our exports.
At a minimum, we’re looking at a huge economic depression.
Worst case, America falls over the impeachment trial of George W. Bush.
We become a failed state.
All for what would essentially be an empty gesture.
I think alphie is monkyboy’s bastard spawn, myself.
Really? People are going to stop doing business with us? The same people who gleefully do business with Sudan, China, Saddam’s Iraq, etc? The people who cooked up the Oil For Food scam to keep on supplying arms to Saddam despite UN-imposed sanctions are going to stop doing business with the US if we do anything to the country that’s been at war with us for 30 years?
What would the effect be on the rest of the world if they stopped trading with the US? Once you comprehend that, you’ll realize that it’s simply impossible.
Who keeps telling you your opinions have worth? Because whoever it is, they’re lying to you.
No, alpee. Youare the joke.
We have two choices:
1. Do nothing
2. Built an impotent balloon fence that won’t stop Iran missiles but will kill thousands of innocent seagulls, make our continued presence in Iraq untenable and make America a waterfowl pariah.
No need to worry about Iran anymore folks – Joe Biden and four other senators have sent a secret letter to Ahmamahdinutjob and his masters