Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

“Iran on course for nuclear bomb, EU told”

From the Financial Times:

Iran will be able to develop enough weapons-grade material for a nuclear bomb and there is little that can be done to prevent it, an internal European Union document has concluded.

In an admission of the international community’s failure to hold back Iran’s nuclear ambitions, the document –- compiled by the staff of Javier Solana, EU foreign policy chief –- says the atomic programme has been delayed only by technical limitations rather than diplomatic pressure. “Attempts to engage the Iranian administration in a negotiating process have not so far succeeded,” it states.

Hmm. Perhaps they simply aren’t trying hard enough, or you know—using the right “carrots.” Or else, Bush’s cowboy posturing is making it impossible for Iran to come to the table in good faith.  Though they’d certainly like to.

Having the American military in Iraq certainly isn’t helping things, either.  Plus, EuroDisney and Cinemax After Dark?—abominations that, like Israel, simply must be destroyed in an atomic burst of hellfire, Allah willing.  Because of the western economic colonialism underpinning in the entire sham edifice of “globalization” and such.

Have I forgotten anything?  Because if we’re satisfied to sit by and let things spiral out of control, it’s always best have a set of excuses to trot out on the backend, I’ve found.

The downbeat conclusions of the “reflection paper” –- seen by the Financial Times –- are certain to be seized on by advocates of military action, who fear that Iran will be able to produce enough fissile material for a bomb over the next two to three years. Tehran insists its purposes are purely peaceful.

“At some stage we must expect that Iran will acquire the capacity to enrich uranium on the scale required for a weapons programme,” says the paper, dated February 7 and circulated to the EU’s 27 national governments ahead of a foreign ministers meeting yesterday.

“In practice . . . the Iranians have pursued their programme at their own pace, the limiting factor being technical difficulties rather than resolutions by the UN or the International Atomic Energy Agency.



“The problems with Iran will not be resolved through economic sanctions alone.”

So.  What to make of this?  Does this give the US and Israel the tacit go-ahead to pull the military option off the table in order to dress it Kevlar and give its very own chair and a big plate of carbs? 

Writes Allahpundit:

Letting Iran have the bomb means letting the Saudis and Egyptians have it, too, since the U.S. isn’t about to line up against the Sunnis any more so than we’ve already done in Iraq. Israel can’t afford proliferation in the Middle East and the Sunni governments probably aren’t all that hot for the idea either given the threat they face from jihadis, so if it comes to the point where attacking is the only solution, the IAF will play deus ex machina. Or rather, they’ll try to.

But we’re not there yet.

Just as it is certain Iran is actively meddling in Iraq, it is equally certain that US Special Forces have penetrated Iran and gathered whatever intel is necessary to create a workable plan for throttling—even if only temporarily—Iran’s nuclear ambitions.  The difference being that the Iranians aren’t constrained to act by the braying of their political dissidents.

Which is to say, with people like Wes Clark shrieking from the sidelines that any attack on Iran will only serve to prove that our government has been usurped by a shadowy cabal of monied New York Jews, and with member members of the Democratic Congress stepping over each other to appear more anti-war than the next (cf John Edward’s recent rhetorical contortions on his Iran position, in which the presidential hopeful was whipped by the netroots into walking back erstwhile muscular rhetoric in favor of unintelligible pap), the chances of a strong US military maneuver are slim.  Hell, even a cluster of Republican politicos are so worried about polls that they’d happily to kick the can down the road a bit, if doing so would assuage those suffering from war fatigue and keep the GOP puffed shirts in the good graces of the voting public.

Leadership being overrated when you can have power instead. 

Sadly, Iran’s greatest ally is western public opinion—tethered as it is to a completely neutered and feckless EU and UN and an international press that is largely hostile to Israel.  And the mullahs know it.

Which reminds me:  did the sight of Diane Sawyer interviewing Achmanidinejihad on “Good Morning America” this morning—her head dutifully wrapped in a scarf while the Iranian president rebuked her again and again for interrupting –make anyone else a little bit queasy?  Particularly when Diane came away from the interview noting that the big fella’ seems to have softened his stance somewhat on that whole rain of hellfire thing, allowing that it is up to the “Palestinians” whether Israel be granted permission to exist?

Why, what good news!  Back to you, Robin!

But who knows.  Maybe I’m just one of those serial bedwetters.  Perhaps the next strongly worded condemnation from the EU will cause the mullahs to blink.  Then, we can all go back to our dreams of universal healthcare, and President Obama can teach us all how to overcome our hatred for the brown man.

80 Replies to ““Iran on course for nuclear bomb, EU told””

  1. nikkolai says:

    President Obama? Wait’ll you see the pulvarized, bloody pulp of his carcass once HillBillary comes a’ callin’.

    Didn’t Mossad have a little something to do with the Iranian nuclear scientist death? How bout a little of that magic on the Dinnerjacket guy?

  2. JohnAnnArbor says:

    Sadly, Iran’s greatest ally is western public opinion—tethered as it is to a completely neutered and feckless EU and UN and an international press that is largely hostile to Israel.  And the mullahs know it.

    I’m convinced that Europe is fully prepared to shake its head sadly and write a few letters if Iran nukes Israel from end to end.  They might even have trade sanctions for a year or so.

    And secretly, they’d shrug and move on, glad to have THAT little problem off their hands.

  3. JohnAnnArbor says:

    And the Guardian would editorialize that it was sad, but Israel asked for it, by insisting on, you know, existing.

  4. LionDude says:

    The European Union is intentionally misleading us in a rush to war with no plan to keep the peace.  I’m not saying they’re lying, but I don’t think they’re being truthful.  But don’t get me wrong…I will be glad if the nukular capability of Iran is eliminated.  I just get fussy when I want it to appear I wasn’t told the truth…or something like that.  Must…twist…more…

  5. happyfeet says:

    Is that the link you wanted for “kick the can down the road a bit” … ?

  6. Robespierre says:

    “Iran on course for nuclear bomb.”

    Well, duh.

  7. ahem says:

    Upon reflection, the indifference of the West to the slaughter in Rwanda and Darfur has forshadowed and thrown into high relief the reality of its cultural and spiritual death. It has succumbed to hopelessness and despair. The only thing left is for us to recognize this.

    I’m preparing for two things: 1) the destruction of most of Israel as leaders in the West stand around making excuses for their inaction and 2) the world war that will result when the idea of acquiescing to our own destruction becomes too much for some of us.

    Maybe this will force a re-birth of the West, but we have a lot further to descend before we can rise again.

  8. Jeff Goldstein says:

    Is that the link you wanted for “kick the can down the road a bit” … ?

    No.  It was supposed to go elsewhere.

    The link that is to go in its place, which I can’t find just now, was the Baker Commission Report suggesting we talk with Iran—in between their parliamentary shouts of “Death to America,” presumably.

  9. Major John says:

    The EU isn’t even making strongly worded condemnations anymore.  They have shrugged and basically said “over to you, Zionists and Imperialist Cowboys….please.”

    Being the S-5 of a Sustainment Brigade, I recon I’ll be involved in explaining to the few surviovrs of the eventual nuclear exchange that “we are here to help…now.  Sorry ‘bout that.”

  10. Major John says:

    At least I won’t have to explain my poor typing skills…

  11. jdm says:

    Leadership being overrated when you can have power instead.

    Bismarck is quoted to the effect that God looks out for fools, drunks, and the United States of America. I wonder if our luck is running out?

    This post, albeit obliquely, reminds me of Steven den Beste’s strategic overview. In effect, this post updates the reasons for a (still more) muscular policy in the Middle East in general and specifically why Iraq is so important.

  12. Which reminds me:  did the sight of Diane Sawyer interviewing Achmanidinejihad on “Good Morning America” this morning—her head dutifully wrapped in a scarf while the Iranian president rebuked her again and again for interrupting –make anyone else a little bit queasy?

    I get queasy whenever I see (or even hear about) a western reporter fellating a strongman or a strongman’s mouthpiece. We have reporters declaring that “everything the Bush administration says is a lie” while simultaneously swallowing as gospel everything coming from Ahmanidinejad.

    It makes me wonder if they realize how foolish and evil they appear.

  13. alphie says:

    Seems like we have two options:

    1. Do nothing.

    2. Launch an impotent attack on Iran that won’t stop them from getting nukes but will kill thousands of innocent Iranians, make our continued presence in Iraq untenable and make America an international pariah.

    Tough call.

  14. Robb Allen says:

    It makes me wonder if they realize how foolish and evil they appear.

    No.

    No they don’t.

  15. Wow, alphie. I bet you’re not even aware you’ve committed a fallacy with that one.

    Idiot.

  16. Matt, Esq. says:

    According to you and your buddy John Kerry and the rest of the ‘progressives’ alphie, the US is already an international pariah.

    Also, I love your plan is basically

    a.  Be a complete pussy

    b.  Be a complete pussy. 

    Yes, for those of us not complete pussys, it is a tough call.

  17. Gray says:

    Seems like we have two options:

    1. Do nothing.

    2. Launch an impotent attack on Iran that won’t stop them from getting nukes but will kill thousands of innocent Iranians, make our continued presence in Iraq untenable and make America an international pariah.

    No, alpee.  Only in your life are you confronted with the options:

    1.  Do nothing.

    2.  Do something ineffective and destructive.

    That is you projecting your personal problems onto this international security problem.

    You don’t have an actual political view, you just have personal problems that color your politics.

    It seems you have a constant loop running in your head that says:  “If I take action, people won’t like me.”

    I believe you hate the Bush administration and particulary the military because their decisiveness and courage in confronting problems is a complete rebuke to the mincing, cowardly way you have always live.

    Decisiveness and confidence in others makes you feel bad because it highlights all that you lack and all the chances you missed….

    You’ve got a personal problem with confidence and learned passiveness.

    Stop taking it out on us.

  18. Tai Chi Wawa says:

    At least I won’t have to explain my poor typing skills…

    Actually, I think spelling survivors of a nuclear exchange “surviovrs” is descriptively appropriate.

  19. JohnAnnArbor says:

    I believe you hate the Bush administration and particulary the military because their decisiveness and courage in confronting problems

    I’m sure alphie is very decisive in acting if one of two conditions is met:

    1. The outcome is 100% guaranteed.

    2. The course of action fits his worldview.

  20. alppuccino says:

    Look to the Dixie Chix lyrics for answers to all these questions alphie.

    ……..look harder.

  21. Dan Collins says:

    Iran: Technology 65 years behind ours, Dominant culture 700 years behind ours.  What a combination.  This is why there’s a Prime Directive on Star Trek (I mean, apart from no cellulite in outer space).

  22. Steve says:

    Obviously offensive military action against Iran is risky, esp since the armed forces of the United States are already embroiled in conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, and have numerous other roles worldwide.  A “pure” air power action may degrade Iran’s nuclear capability, but it will also have probable effects in the realm of our economy (fuel prices), stability in Iraq (gloves off for the Shi’tes we are supporting), and incidentally probably cause significant collateral damage in Iran which will further degrade the US standing in the world (and that’s not completely irrelevant.)

    Therefore the situation re: Iran is serious and there are no easy or simple solutions. It doesn’t help that the American people are not behind the current effort, for a variety of reasons.  I have yet to hear a political leader deliver an effective “This is what we gotta do” speech. That is a major failure.

  23. Jeff Goldstein says:

    Over the last 5 years I’ve written a number of times about how difficult it is to negotiate the Iran problem.

    Once constant?  Five years have passed, and things have gotten progressively worse.

  24. Chris says:

    Seems like alphie has two options:

    1. Do nothing.

    2. Launch an impotent attack on Protien Wisdom that won’t stop them from being conservative but will annoy thousands of innocent blog readers, make our continued presence in the comments untenable and make liberals in general an online pariah.

    You could substitute just about any situation into alphie’s words and totally get him and how he lives.

    The dishes need to be washed.

    Well, it looks like we have two options.

    1. Do nothing.

    2. Launch an impotent attack on the dirty dishes that won’t stop them from being dirty again but will keep me from commenting on PW, make the dishes continued presence in the sink untenable and make food in general an clean dish pariah.

    Man, that is brilliant.

  25. alphie says:

    Gray,

    This is not a joke.

    If we launch and unprovoked attack on Iran, we better be prepared to go it alone in the world.

    No more oil.

    No more foreign credit.

    No more markets for our exports.

    At a minimum, we’re looking at a huge economic depression.

    Worst case, America falls over the impeachment trial of George W. Bush.

    We become a failed state.

    All for what would essentially be an empty gesture.

  26. ahem says:

    I think alphie is monkyboy’s bastard spawn, myself.

  27. No more oil.

    No more foreign credit.

    No more markets for our exports.

    Really? People are going to stop doing business with us? The same people who gleefully do business with Sudan, China, Saddam’s Iraq, etc? The people who cooked up the Oil For Food scam to keep on supplying arms to Saddam despite UN-imposed sanctions are going to stop doing business with the US if we do anything to the country that’s been at war with us for 30 years?

    What would the effect be on the rest of the world if they stopped trading with the US? Once you comprehend that, you’ll realize that it’s simply impossible.

    Who keeps telling you your opinions have worth? Because whoever it is, they’re lying to you.

  28. Gray says:

    This is not a joke.

    No, alpee.  Youare the joke.

    We have two choices:

    1.  Do nothing

    2. Built an impotent balloon fence that won’t stop Iran missiles but will kill thousands of innocent seagulls, make our continued presence in Iraq untenable and make America a waterfowl pariah.

  29. JWebb says:

    No need to worry about Iran anymore folks – Joe Biden and four other senators have sent a secret letter to Ahmamahdinutjob and his masters to “resolve” the problem.

    If that fails, we can always count on Jamie Rubin and his execreble wife <a href=”<a href=”http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?story id=8924″>Christiane</a> to save the day.

    I love free-lancers

  30. Chris says:

    This is not a joke.

    No more oil.

    No more foreign credit.

    No more markets for our exports.

    Well, this situation is not a joke, but you and your analysis certainly is. No more oil? You are ignoring the fact that I personally, am, at this moment, sitting atop billions of barrels of untapped oil. That will probably never be tapped, but just the same. No more foreign credit? With the United States being the largest financial market in the world, I find that hard to believe.. Ok, at this point I am just wasting everyone’s time debating your dumbass analysis.

    tw: plan18, plan9’s duplicate.

  31. Lurking Observer says:

    Yes, the entire world, including Mexico and (Sunni) Saudi Arabia will order a global blockade on oil routes to the United States if we attack Iran.

    Why?

    B/c alphie said so.

    Is this what happened when you got the Executive Summary you summarily summoned yesterday, alphie?

    Pe-haps we should go back to tawking to widdle alphie like the addle-pated poltwoon dat he is, b/c his watest widdle posting would certainly indicate dat!

    Weally, widdle alphie. Aw we to bewieve dat, on your say-so, the woild will shun Amewica? Perhaps you see yourself like Kim Jong-il, and just as ronery?

    Awwww, widdle alphie! So sad! So ronery!

  32. Patrick says:

    Isaac Davis: Has anybody read that Nazis are gonna march in New Jersey? Y’know, I read this in the newspaper. We should go down there, get some guys together, y’know, get some bricks and baseball bats and really explain things to them.

    Party Guest: There is this devastating satirical piece on that on the Op Ed page of the Times, it is devastating.

    Isaac Davis: Well, a satirical piece in the Times is one thing, but bricks and baseball bats really gets right to the point.

    I saw this on TV last night and thought of this.  It made me feel sad.

  33. RFN says:

    First off, *lph**, it wouldn’t be an unprovoked attack on innocent old Iran.  They are provoking us as you sit there touching yourself.  Oh, and yes, the world’s “acceptance” is all that is truly important for you.  Somehow, I think the world will learn to understand and get over it.

  34. J. Peden says:

    It seems you [alhpie] have a constant loop running in your head that says:  “If I take action, people won’t like me.”

    =”I don’t like myself”, “Can’t you all just not like yourselves, too?”, “Can’t you understand me?”.

    “Oh Dark Lord, please don’t let me be misunderstood.”

  35. You are ignoring the fact that I personally, am, at this moment, sitting atop billions of barrels of untapped oil. That will probably never be tapped, but just the same.

    I’d tap it.

  36. Chris says:

    I would too, If I had the mineral rights. Problem is, I dont. And, Liberals wont let us drill for any new oil here in michigan.

  37. alppuccino says:

    I’d tap it.

    Shamefully, just three weeks ago I was thinking the same thing about Anna Nicole.

    The medium-sized ANS, not the huge one.

  38. alppuccino says:

    alright…….maybe the huge one too

  39. Dan Collins says:

    If you’d prefer, you can leave your alphie comments here.  Otherwise, you can probably find some useful cut and paste stuff there.

  40. Chris says:

    Apparently everone has tapped that! “Im spermicus!” they all claim.

  41. nikkolai says:

    I’m guessing that one of the many ass-whippings alphie received in gym class must have done some serious damage….

  42. LionDude says:

    Woa, forgot the “going it alone” part in my parody post above.  A thanks to Alphie for the reminder.

  43. A fine scotch says:

    Robert C.,

    If it weren’t for some Truthers being, well, Truthers in the comments section at QandO the last sentence of your 11:48 post would have been the funniest thing I’ve read in a long time.

    As it is, however, it’s only the second funniest thing I’ve read today.

    Can we all agree to make that the standard response to any @lph!3 proclamation?

  44. Gray says:

    I’m guessing that one of the many ass-whippings alphie received in gym class must have done some serious damage….

    It was an atomic wedgie.  He was never the same again….

  45. Rob B. says:

    “Going it alone.” The new cardinal sin in international politics.

    My question is what other contry has a military capable of projecting force anywhere in the globe? We’ve been going it alone, in that sense, since the cold war ended. Sure other people can commit people to help fight and forces to augment the US capabilites but over all we have become the spine of the rest of the worlds force. They know it and they resent it but when bad things happen, be it man made or natural disaster, they still call us first.

  46. Dan Collins says:

    Gray–

    To tell the truth, though, he was never the same before.  NTTAWWT.

  47. Rob B. says:

    Sanctions and strongly worded letters is about all the arrows a lot of countries have left in their quiver.

  48. RFN says:

    Yeah, Dan, I felt terrible even acknowledging the little guy’s existance, but the inference that the US is not being provoked was too much for me to let go.  “MUST say no to drugs and *lph**” Well, maybe not drugs so much…

  49. The_Real_JeffS says:

    “Going it alone.” The new cardinal sin in international politics.

    Unless it involves North Korea.  Nuance, Rob.  Nuance.

    TW: theory45.  In theory, my .45 would solve a lot of problems.

  50. J. Peden says:

    “Going it alone.” The new cardinal sin in international politics.

    Everyone knows that everyone should now hate Cowboys, don’t che’ know, unless of course they herd sheep or Cubans, or are called to negotiate alone with NoKo or Iran.

  51. Rob B. says:

    Or global warming… Yeah, nuance it is.

  52. Mikey NTH says:

    A-bot shows all of the concerns of an adolescent,to do what is popular rather than what is right.

  53. MarkD says:

    At first, I thought aphids screed was off base. 

    I wouldn’t want to be the one breaking it to all those Chinese factory workers that we’ve decided we’re not going to trade with the evil Americans, and they’re all unemployed.

    Then I realized, he has a plan.  They’ll sell all that WalMart stuff to Iran, and North Korea, and Darfur, and Somalia, and Bosnia.  On credit, of course, because they are the downtrodden masses and are good for it.

    Then I woke up.

  54. B Moe says:

    “How can you talk about bombing a country when you won’t even talk to them?” said Clark. “It’s outrageous. We’re the United States of America; we don’t do that. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying the military option is off the table—but diplomacy is not what Jim Baker says it is. It’s not, What will it take for you boys to support us on Iraq? It’s sitting down for a couple of days and talking about our families and our hopes, and building relationships.”

    They hope their family gets into heaven by killing your family, Wes.  Good luck with building a relationship on that.

  55. TomB says:

    If we launch and unprovoked attack on Iran, we better be prepared to go it alone in the world.

    No more oil.

    Yea fuckstick, because OPEC isn’t going to sell oil to anyone, lest we become the beneficiary (google “fungible”, asshat), and will sit on their reserves, just out of principle.

    Cause that’s the kind of people they are.

    Do you have to try to post monumentally stupid things, or is it just a gift?

  56. alphie says:

    Well,

    Not all cowboys are alike.

    There are smart cowboys and dumb cowboys.

    Bombing Iran now is a dumb cowboy move.

    I don’t think we’ve even refilled our strategic oil reserves since Katrina hit.

  57. Phil Smith says:

    Gawdammit boy, how many times you gotta get your ass kicked before you realize you’re not Bruce Lee?

  58. BJTexs says:

    While a***ie spews forth utter inanaties (pray tell, who is China going to sell all of the crap that they make to?) there is an interesting post at MEMRI that would seem to indicate that Iran, for all of its posturing, has some serious economic issues of its own. (and yes, a-bot, MEMRI, tool of the Mossad, blah, blah, blah.)

    Th idea of economic and political conflict between Iran and Saudi Arabia makes sense to me, as well as Iran’s desire for some level of chaos in the ME.

    It’s a tough decision but doesn’t necessarily have to involve massive boots on the ground or something ineffective.

    And a-bot, it doesn’t matter what anybody here writes. You will continue to post goofy non sequiturs all the while wringing your hands that the absolute horror of it all.

    Yeesh! Grow a set.

  59. happyfeet says:

    alphie, the way the SPR was used in Katrina was in the form of loaned crude to refineries who are liable for replacing the loaned oil –

  60. B Moe says:

    I think we should put some bad-ass Delta Force Ninja motherfuckers in some shipping containers marked “Top Secret Nuclear Stuff” and send them over there to Iran.  When they open them up down in them bunkers, boy won’t they be surprised!

  61. TomB says:

    So alfie, who is OPEC going to sell their oil to if they cut off the US?

  62. BJTexs says:

    B Moe:

    Great idea! We can actually ship an entire armored battalian along with the ninja dudes to secure the site. Then use another shipping container to bring in an engineering battalian to build around the sites…

    wait for it…

    MILE HIGH DIRT BERMSâ„¢!

    You and I should rule the world…

  63. alphie says:

    China just built some rather large strategic oil reserve holes of their own that they’re lookin’ to fill, TomB.

    All they have to do is take the money they’d be lending to us to cover our war debt and give it to Iran and Hugo and…there ya go.

    We’re broke and have no oil and nobody’s fired a shot.

    Think this time, cakewalk boys.

    Bad move.

    Very bad move.

  64. TomB says:

    China just built some rather large strategic oil reserve holes of their own that they’re lookin’ to fill, TomB.

    And what are the capacity of those “holes”, alfie?

    What happens after they are filled?

    If China isn’t trading with us, where will they get the money to pay for all this oil?

    All they have to do is take the money they’d be lending to us to cover our war debt and give it to Iran and Hugo and…there ya go.

    Huh? Care to explain that. Cause I have NO IDEA what the hell you are talking about.

  65. alphie says:

    China’s trade with us is a rather small part of their economy, TomB, 1-2% at most.

    We need them far more than they need us.

    Still, America getting labeled a terrorist nation by the civilized world and being subjected to economic sanctions would be a fitting end to Bush’s reign as The Decider.

  66. TomB says:

    You missed the rest of my questions alfie.

    Totally inadvertantly, I’m sure.

  67. Defense Guy says:

    It really is fantastic that in alphie’s world the US is the most impotent nation.  We can do nothing because we are powerless.

    You need to mix up your biscuit to blue ribbon ratio buddy, as no one can sustain the levels you are running on for very long.

  68. TomB says:

    China’s trade with us is a rather small part of their economy, TomB, 1-2% at most.

    You’re an idiot, alfie:

    For 2005, Chinese foreign trade reached $1.3 trillion (81% of GDP of $1.6 trillion), with a trade surplus of $102 billion (6.4% of GDP). About $100 billion of the Chinese trade surplus with the US went to pay for Chinese trade deficits with other countries.

    These figures show that trade is now a precariously excessive portion of Chinese GDP. And without a trade surplus with the US, China would face a global trade deficit of about 6.25% of GDP, more than the United States’ 5.7%.

    We need them far more than they need us.

    What happens when all the US companies with factories in China leave?

    Still, America getting labeled a terrorist nation by the civilized world and being subjected to economic sanctions would be a fitting end to Bush’s reign as The Decider.

    BWHAHAAAHAAA!!! Leaving aside the sheer lunacy of your wet dream of the US being labelled a “terrorist nation”, since when does being labelled a “terorist nation” mean anything? Seems to me Saddam did quite a business with Germany, France, Russia, the UN, et.al. while being and evil “terrorist nation”.

  69. Gray says:

    Still, America getting labeled a terrorist nation by the civilized world and being subjected to economic sanctions would be a fitting end to Bush’s reign as The Decider.

    Yeah, alpee, you’d like that.

    He just can’t stand the idea that some people are decisive and courageous–’cuz he isn’t.

    alpee is a wounded little person who’s wounds color his intensely personal political views.

  70. TomB says:

    Come on alfie, how big’s dem holes?!

    (we now pause as alfie totally ignores the thread until the proper non-sequitur pops up)

  71. I have to ask again—is ANYONE really alphie-stupid? It’s gotta be an act, right? No one could be so ignorant of history, economics, and basic logic, right?

  72. bigbooner says:

    Forget about Alphie. It’s time to get serious. Send in Joe Wilson.

  73. TomB says:

    I have to ask again—is ANYONE really alphie-stupid? It’s gotta be an act, right? No one could be so ignorant of history, economics, and basic logic, right?

    I don’t know Robert. Alfie seems to be militantly stupid. So clueless that he is completely sure of his beliefs, and so ill-informed as to not know how wrong those beliefs really are.

    I was debating the war on another site when someone tried to prove his point by quoting a poll stating the majority of people thought we should be out of Iraq (or something like that), I responded with a poll that said the majority of Americans believed Noah’s Ark story was literally true. The point being, of course, that polls are essentially garbage.

    He immediately launched into me, calling me a asshole for making up poll results. I merely responded with a link to the ABC (Newsweek?) poll. I then asked him how wrapped up in his own worldview he was that he could dismiss out of hand a poll he had never seen and didn’t even bother to look up. He just knew it wasn’t true.

    That is militant ignorance. And that is what alfie does every time he makes up facts, like the “big chinese oil holes” or the “mile high dirt berm” or the “balloon fence”, and on and on.

  74. wishbone says:

    I have to ask again—is ANYONE really alphie-stupid? It’s gotta be an act, right? No one could be so ignorant of history, economics, and basic logic, right?

    Have you listened to Jimmy Carter lately?

    Still, alphie–you could cure most of the realy sloppy stuff with a Google or two.  Yes, we drew down the SPR by 400 million barrels and haven’t refilled it.  Everyone remembers that.  Especially the oil markets.

    (That was sarcasm, alphie.)

  75. B Moe says:

    I have to ask again—is ANYONE really alphie-stupid?

    Dude, go check out the commenters at TBogg, SadlyNo, Pandagon, or most other moonbat blogs- alphie is a friggin genius compared to most of them.

  76. TomB says:

    Dude, go check out the commenters at TBogg, SadlyNo, Pandagon, or most other moonbat blogs- alphie is a friggin genius compared to most of them.

    Much like saying alfie’s the prettiest fat girl at the dance…

  77. Major John says:

    Seems a mix of the directness of actus, the clarity of PIATOR and the seriousness of monkyboy…

  78. B Moe says:

    Much like saying alfie’s the prettiest fat girl at the dance…

    More like the best singer at a school for the deaf.

  79. nikkolai says:

    alphie could be the tallest midget.

  80. McGehee says:

    In a kingdom of the blind, the blind and deaf man is king.

Comments are closed.