Nancy, you’re my bitch!*
Search
Archive Calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | |||||
Archives
Categories
- A Government That Can Force You to Buy Health Insurance Can Make You Do Anything (3)
- a protein wisdom philosophy primer (3)
- academics (25)
- armadillo (8)
- Friday Fiction 100 Word Challenge (51)
- from the protein wisdom conceptual series (136)
- identity politics (33)
- If Republicans Win the Senate in 2014 (1)
- in which celebraties comment on current events (67)
- language / intentionalism (88)
- legal (6)
- My brief conversations with inanimate objects (130)
- NSA / FISA (46)
- One Term to Serve, the 2012 Revival (6)
- Overheard in a Fallujah bunker (27)
- Poems from 196x, Revised by the Ghost of Richard Brauti (27)
- protein wisdom's DNC coverage (30)
- protein wisdom's RNC coverage (29)
- protein wisdom: the movie Lists (20)
- Provocateurism (16)
- real-time empirical observations (51)
- red pills found behind the sofa cushions (42)
- Scenes from my driveway (61)
- Talking back to 80s music (41)
- The Martha Stewart Chronicles (58)
- The protein wisdom interviews (10)
- The protein wisdom original poems (142)
- Uncategorized (20,046)
- Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance, abridged (34)
Recent Comments
- In The Mailbox: 02.28.23 (Afternoon Edition) : The Other McCain on Hey, longtime pw readers…
- In The Mailbox: 12.23.22 : The Other McCain on Patrick J. Carroll truly IS a sad, embittered psychopath
- Danger on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
- Danger on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
- In The Mailbox: 07.18.22 : The Other McCain on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
Will Pelosi send the sheep to slaughter in order to feed her Bushate-worshipping wolves?
At these her overloads will cover her up, I’ll give them that.
When did she transition from being a bitch to being your bitch. I didn’t even know the bitch was up for grabs. All I wanted for Christmas was a new bitch.
It’s pretty poor coordination when the military wing has to send the propaganda wing of a party a message stating the obvious.
I wasn’t sure why the new nuanced perspective being taken by the democrats and their propaganda arm, the MSM, was that Iraq can now be called a failure, but now I see they are under orders from their muslim masters.
The beauty for the libs, is that no matter what happens, it can all be blamed on Bush, for unillaterally invading Iraq in the first place.
This must be fake. Because we all know—KNOW!—that the terrorists don’t pay attention to our media, or our internecine political battlings.
To even suggest such a thing marks one an unthinking, unnuanced, gouche simpleton who is so desperate at the failure of a bungling US military (who, don’t take that the wrong way—we love you guys!) that he will lay some of the blame for problems we’re having in Iraq at the feet of homegrown propagandists whose actions are, in effect if not in intent, aiding the enemy.
And that is just teh r1d1cul0u5!
And Hekmatyar Gulbuddin had already boasted of the same in Afghanistan. I’m curious to see if anyone even bothers to ask a high level Democrat their reaction to this little info war nugget…
I can just see the screaming headlines tomorrow morning…….not.
It’s cute how wingnuts rely on al quaeda for political analysis of US elections.
That was a poorly chosen word, making meaningless your your attempt to be cute.
Sorry, I just thought you should know.
HOLY SHIT!!
Someone fixed the clock!
Yes Democrats. Everybody perceives you as soft on defense and soft on terrorists.
Any other questions? Any more excuses?
It’s cute how wingnuts rely on al quaeda for political analysis of US elections.
What a zinger, huh?
Anybody? Helloooooo…?
Cordially…
P.S. Dear ‘Fantastic’: please knock down that “political analysis.”
Funny how Ayman al Zawahri is now using Republican talking points and the right outright agrees with him.
The challenge to ‘Fantastic’ extends to unserious: please dispute Zawahri’s points. How will “progressives” disappoint him?
Cordially…
Do you guys believe in matyrdom and 72 virgins now too? A caliphate in Saudi Arabia?
Accepting the analysis of the second in command of Al Queada? Does that mean you support his way of thinking on everything or are you just making common cause with “an enemy of your enemy”.
As much as Mr. Goldstein doth protest, he sees the true enemy of his people in his fellow citizens and their ideas (like me), and not Al Queda
“His people?” Al Queda isn’t your enemy, I take it.
Nice job disabusing Z. of his satisfaction over the election results.
Cordially…
P.S. “ideas.” Har!
timmyB nails it. wingnuts hate “moonbats” and “dhimmicrats” more than they hate al quaeda. pretty sad. fortunately for thinking people everywhere, wingnut politics are no longer ascendant.
Do you fools project much? What is it about moonbats that makes them think they’re clairvoyant, and have some special knowledge of what other people think?
Everybody knows that the Democrats are a national security disaster. Zowie knows it just as he knows that water is wet. If he came out and said that, it wouldn’t change the fact into a nonfact. Things are what they are regardless of who recognizes it.
He’s on your side, kids. And he’s glad to have finally won a round. It’s been a long time for you guys, hasn’t it? He’s cheering with you, but not for you.
Words, words, words, but nothing *said* by the apprenticing dhimmis here to pour cold water over the Z-man’s (surely, a “thinking people”*) gratification over the election results.
Now, dhimmis, NOW is your time to proclaim your resolve to confront and combat global theocracy! Show him–and us–your unconquerable determination to smother this evil. Or does the fight really start at home, with Pat Robertson?
Cordially…
* other “thinking people” being, oh…Neville Chamberlain and Edouard Daladier.
the only foreign policy disaster going on right now was led by a Republican administration. hard to see how the democrats could do any worse.
congratulations to Rick for being the one-millionth mindless wingnut to invoke Neville Chamberlain.
Fantastic, I detect a Chamberlainesque qualm in your tone.
1,000,000,001<- me
So much stupid packed in so little space.
Agreeing on an analysis of events doesn’t imply agreement on anything else. And no, we aren’t making “common cause with an enemy of our enemy”, we’re pointing out that our enemy states he made common cause with the Democrats. The only ones with any explaining to do are them.
See the difference timmy? No, I didn’t think you could.
No, it isn’t hard to see at all. Not when the bad guys admit they perform their actions all to influence the behavior of Democrats.
The only anything that’s going on right now is led by a Republican administration. You can tell by the way that there’s a Republican administration in charge. But our biggest current international relations problem was birthed by Jimmy Carter, moonbat Democrat.
congratulations to Rick for being the one-millionth mindless wingnut to invoke Neville Chamberlain.
We wingnuts wouldn’t invoke Chamberlain so much, or stop, if some “thinking people” would detail how the comparison is inapt. You’re obviously not one to do it.
Cordially…
Explain to me where he claims common cause with Democrats? Just because you claim it’s true, doesn’t make it true, Mikey. In fact, your faith re: this topic seems to be more apporpriate to the discussion on faith vs reason.
herre ya go Tim
Because he’s calling on you guys to negotiate
“The first is that you aren’t the ones who won the midterm elections, nor are the Republicans the ones who lost. Rather, the Mujahideen  the Muslim Ummah’s vanguard in Afghanistan and Iraq  are the ones who won, and the American forces and their Crusader allies are the ones who lost,†Zawahri said, according to a full transcript obtained by ABC News.
Zawahri calls on the Democrats to negotiate with him and Osama bin Laden, not others in the Islamic world who Zawahri says cannot help.
Maybe if we throw the Israelis under the bus it will buy us a little more time.
Yeah, that’s likely, Rusty.
I’m only pointing out that Zawahiri is making the claim, timmy. And one does have to wonder why he would even make such a statement – unless the words of the Democratic Party and its members have been such that he would expect he could be taken seriously. You may think it is nothing that this nation’s sworn enemies are claiming that the victory of the Democrats is really their own, but I find it rather depressing.
Words have consequences, timmy.
Think about it.
– *chuckle* – The Wahhbists just keep on jumping the gun, and pissing in the SecProgs “one world” cornflakes….Must be hell trying to sort out next weeks talking points, when you never know what the peace loving infidel killers will come up with next. The Dems are worried now, because they’ve lost the “we’re not in charge” excuse. Gonna be an interesting year…..
Slight miss there, timmyB; it should be:
Aw. Common! Think of all the money you’ll save.
No, SDN, I said it as it is, not how you may want to imagine it.
Rusty, not that they need my money or help, but paying that money keeps a realtive peace in the Middle East.
Look at this way, from 1948 to 1977 there were 4 major wars (1948, ‘56,’67 ‘74) between Israel and its neighbors, creating instability and oil price spikes. Since we promised to start paying blood money to the Israelis and the Egyptians, the only real Middle East wars were started by Saddam Hussein or us. 6 billion seems paltry for that. So, as far I’m concerned, the Egyptians and Israelis can continue to nervously smile across the Sinai and keep cashing my check.
Besides, where would the Left Behind crowd take their vacations if there was no American support for Israel?