Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Olbermann Fan? [Dan Collins]

I’m just, y’know, asking.

WASHINGTON (CNN)—Cookies mailed to the U.S. Supreme Court last year contained enough rat poison to kill all nine justices, retired member Sandra Day O’Connor said at a conference last week.

Barbara Joan March, a 60-year-old Connecticut woman, was sentenced last month to 15 years in prison. She sent 14 threatening letters in April 2005—each with a baked good or piece of candy laced with rat poison—to a variety of federal officials: the nine Supreme Court justices; FBI Director Robert Mueller; his deputy; the chief of naval operations; the Air Force chief of staff and the chief of staff of the Army.

March pleaded guilty in March to 14 counts of mailing injurious articles.

March’s plea received little public attention until O’Connor discussed it last week. (Watch how plot to poison justices was revealed—1:52)

“Every member of the Supreme Court received a wonderful package of home-baked cookies, and I don’t know why, (but) the staff decided to analyze them,” the Fort Worth Star-Telegram quoted O’Connor as saying at the legal conference November 10 in the Dallas area. “Each one contained enough poison to kill the entire membership of the court.”

The letters did not seem to pose much of a real danger since the threatening note told the recipients the food was poisoned. In court papers submitted with the plea agreement, prosecutors said each of the envelopes contained a one-page typewritten letter stating either “I am” or “We are” followed by “going to kill you. This is poisoned.”

Supreme Court spokeswoman Kathleen Arberg said the poison packages never reached the chambers of the justices.

All mail sent to the court is screened, and there has been heightened security since anthrax-laced letters were sent to members of Congress and the media in 2001. The Supreme Court also received some suspicious packages at the time, forcing it to shut down for a short period of time. Those packages turned out to be harmless.

Authorities said March included fake handwritten signatures of the purported senders of the letters whose names and return addresses were typed both in the body of the letter and on the envelopes.

Prosecutors said the purported senders live throughout the United States, and were connected to March in various ways, including being classmates, a former co-worker and a former roommate.

Prosecutors said handwritten documents recovered in March’s apartment “reflect that she engaged in considerable planning in order to prepare and send the letters,” including making a detailed list of the purported senders and an apparent to-do list.

So, it will be interesting to see what kinds of affiliations the MSM turns up on Barbara Joan March.

13 Replies to “Olbermann Fan? [Dan Collins]”

  1. semanticleo says:

    Any here want to chant, “Coulter, Coulter, Coulter”

    Real men would.

  2. Paul Zrimsek says:

    Related: Dave Neiwert and one Steven D try to blame this 2005 incident on a 2006 remark by Ann Coulter, and are pwn3d to within an inch of their lives by Tom Maguire.

  3. McGehee says:

    Any here want to chant, “Coulter, Coulter, Coulter”

    Related: Dave Neiwert and one Steven D try to blame this 2005 incident on a 2006 remark by Ann Coulter

    Well, Semi, you want to start that chanting, or not?

  4. proudvastrightwingconspirator says:

    If the MSM finds that Barbara Joan March is affiliated with conservative or christian evangelical types, then expect her to get more ink than Rev. Haggard.

    If, instead, she’s a acolyte of Saint Sheehan, a member in good standing of MoveOn.org or a regular contributor to liberal activist groups, you can expect this story to remain buried under more “important” stories like the Tom Cruise-Katie Holmes wedding or smarmy fluff pieces on the stylish wardrobe of Madame Speaker-to-be.

  5. chuck says:

    Cookies? Whatever happened to apples?

  6. Hunter S. Thomspon says:

    What!  She should have laced those cookies with acid, hash, or maybe even ecstasy.  You also don’t put a note in with them telling them that is what you are doing.  What an idiot.

  7. MMShillelagh says:

    If you read the comments, there is a piece there that at trial it was found that she sent the letters and poisonous items for the purpose of framing the people whose names and addresses she attached to the letters.  This thing was not political, just crazy.  Not that it is easy to distinguish crazy things from political things…

  8. Big Bang hunter says:

    – Actually, I would say if you’re on the Left, it’s impossible.

  9. actus says:

    If the MSM finds that Barbara Joan March is affiliated with conservative or christian evangelical types, then expect her to get more ink than Rev. Haggard.

    Just like that anthrax-scare mailer.

  10. sockpuppet in training says:

    Telephone pole, two differences between the anthrax-scare mailer and this?  This will get less attention and was real.

  11. Rick says:

    Oh, great, the dullard Semanticleo now feels compelled to comment in Protein Wisdom, spreading his/her unique tediousness to another of my favorite blogs.

    Cordially…

  12. actus says:

    Telephone pole, two differences between the anthrax-scare mailer and this?  This will get less attention and was real.

    I know. This was also not recent.

  13. Gecko says:

    “Every member of the Supreme Court received a wonderful package of home-baked cookies, and I don’t know why, (but) the staff decided to analyze them,” the Fort Worth Star-Telegram quoted O’Connor as saying at the legal conference November 10 in the Dallas area.

    Maybe it was because of…

    prosecutors said each of the envelopes contained a one-page typewritten letter stating either “I am” or “We are” followed by “going to kill you. This is poisoned.”

    Duh…

Comments are closed.