Frustrated troll (and highly-regarded Sadly, No! commenter) Lo Ping Wong:
Your son is going to grow up to be a cockslapping faggot just like you Jeff.
Posted by Lo Ping Wong | permalink
on 06/27 at 03:14 PM
Translation: “I’m all for gay marriage. If the fags want a license to poke each other in their filthy fag ears, that’s cool with me. Because I’m progressive, and I care! But just so you know, fags are still the faggiest fucks on earth, and I despise their faggoty sword-crossing behavior with every ounce of my decidedly non sodomizing being.”
Interesting how our self-proclaimed champions of civil rights go right to the gay jokes when they’re looking to denigrate someone, is it not? Even if it is a two-year-old? Which, I seem to remember a certain outrage coming from the nuanced arbiters of truthiness over such behavior in the not too recent past. Dr Andrew? You there? WHERE’S THE OUTRAGE?
Anyway, I’ll leave this up as a public service to Andrew Sullivan—just to let him know with whom he’s aligning himself these days. Seems it ain’t just the Islamists who might want to cut your head off, Andy.
And God only knows what people like Lo Ping Wong have in mind for your beagles once you help them regain power.
****
update: Site underwent a DOS attack. We’re in the process of tracking the source now.
****
update 2: My response to the latest self-righteous hairball coughed up by Sullivan here.
Kim Jong Il thinks:
“Mmmmmmmmm. Beagles……”
How dare you assign intent and meaning to Ping’s words. Heh.
They mainly do it because in their ignorance they think the mere mention of the dreaded “homersekshul” put-down is going to send conservatives into a homophobic tizzy of leather-daddy denial.
It’s telling that so-called liberals will go to the well of racism and homophobia for their putdowns and argumentative methodology when they have nothing constructive to offer in the realm of mature discourse.
TW: has, as in “Lo Ping Wong has to get a life”
Did someone say fag jokes? All right!
And yet telling Lo’s tantrum originates on a thread that oxygenates Jerome Armstrong’s investor hustling.
Lo, you’ve been a total fuckwad from the gate. You really need to toddle off back to whichever sewer you crawled out of.
Speaking of elevating the debate, I posted a similar comment on the Michael Steele / Steve G. thread.
Remember the “simple Sambo” pic that ran on Steve G’s blog from last October? He scrubbed it after massive protestations in the comment thread, but I found it in my archives.
Some “civil” debate.
Are you sure it’s the same guy? The troll whose posting is linked spells “Wong” with two “ns.”
TW “name”.
No, really.
Really? Do you go to firedog?
Sounds like Prof. Andrew “Lo Ping Wong” Haggerty has gone completely berserk.
Am I surprised? “Sadly, No.”
Cordially…
TW: Just today, Lo Ping got demoted from a herpes blister to an ingrown hair to a has-been.
Same guy. He’s using a number of variations to get around being banned. That’s how empty his life is.
The two “n” variation was mine, though, because I banned the one “n” variation and wanted to attribute that comment to its proper owner. He’d posted it under “Jeffgisapussy” or some such.
As my liberal mother-in-law once warned two of my budding rethuglikkkan kids:
“See those people over there? You should never hate them just because they’re Mexican.”
‘Cause, you know, it’s all about the love.
He’s doing a bit of namestealing, as well.
Trust me, Lo, my Mom woulda drowned a kid that had your character. Tough old bitch.
Jeff, do me a favor and delete the 4:44 and 4:45 claiming to be from me. Thanks.
All snark aside, Lo has earned your righteous anger by trying to insult your 2-year old son in his post.
Turing Word: child
What an ugly person, that Lo Ping guy. Makes me wanna sit back, sip a Diet Cherry Vanilla Dr. Pepper, and think about the good old days when a man could relax, sip a… wait, I lost my train of thought.
He’s a real sharpie – he’ll probably try “High Octane Yee” next.
Lo sure ain’t taking very gracefully the revelation we bequeathed him earlier about the profoundly racist history of the Democratic Party.
Rather, it sounds as though he’s fully in touch with his inner, ante bellum Democrat.
Cordially…
The TW does it again: century, as in the Democrats’ shameful ante bellum period.
Progressives use “faggot” in an empowering way, Jeff. You know, like in all the big-budget films, in which gays are always mincing, screeching queens used exclusively for comic relief and played exclusively by robustly hetero actors who are then lauded for their courage?
You know, how during the publicity junkets for Brokeback they made sure to point out what a studly non-cockslapper Heath Ledger is?
OT: Registering is all well and good, but it keeps you from seeing the turing word. Kinda miss that whenever I log in.
I just find it amusing that Lo Ping takes his marching orders from something called “Retardo Montelban.”
It’s like somebody finally told them that D&D isn’t cool anymore, so now they’ve brought role playing and mystic alliances to the internet.
Sad, really. And the reason they don’t append their real names to shit. Or maybe it’s because, like Armando or Thersites, they’ll be outed as shills, or frauds who teach from the annex.
Sheesh. Another pretentious troll’s head a-splodes. Imagine that… this place is a virtual Scanners.
The what? Is that the word you type in to submit a comment?
I hate to sound so dumb, but I must’ve missed that thread.
Yeesh. I’m speechless. Just when you think they hit the bottom of the barrel, they build a lower barrel.
None hate like a liberal.
Hey, Jeff, as a lifelong role-playing gamer, I would appreciate it if you wouldn’t make gratuitous slams against my hobby by associating it with twits like Lo Ping. We have some standards, ya know.
Is that what that noise was? I thought somebody popped a soap bubble.
Yeah, the turing word. Turing test. Alan Turing. Mathematician, codebreaker, and any number of other things. Hella smart guy. The concept is that only a human can see and type in the word, so you don’t get spammed.
Well, Tom, that’s because while the conservatives think liberals are stupid, the liberals are wholly convinced that conservatives are truly and irredeemably evil. Pit-of-the-soul hatred is easy then.
Here’s a thought:
The consensus amongst “progressives” is that homophobes obsessively hate gays because _they_ are secretly gay and are trying to hold back their forbidden urges.
Could it be that liberals are so consumed with calling others racists, homophobes and sexists because _they_ are huge inner bigots?
Gotcha. Thanks Phil. So the trick is to use that word in a phrase that is more or less on-topic?
TW: physical, i.e. only those existing in the physical world are allowed in.
Bots? We don’t serve their kind here!
Wel Jeff, is it good bye for Ho bang wang? It was starting to get funny
Fatmouse,
There, now you’re just gonna make the kosbots mad.
TW: cause… lost, their’s is.
Speaking of Turing, and fags, Turing was a noted fag.
I remember that from Cryptonomicon.
Or was Stephenson making that up?
TW: pressure, as in there’s no pressure to make a comment using the Turing word. It’s just sort of become a boutique-y thing around here. Unless I’m wrong.
And in a strange act of synchronocity, when I went to Amazon to check the spelling of Neal’s name, what was on the list of recommendations, but Gravity’s Rainbow.
TW: world, as in it’s a strange one indeed.
Hey, I kind of like that one. You have been on a roll lately, Jeff. I am just sorry that a post like this one has to even come to be, however.
Perhaps it has to do with their interpretive theory? They reason being gay is no offense to themselves. Any offense is, basically, up to you.
Ie wishing that that those who find homosexuality offensive have gay loved ones? Not so bad. What is bad is having a foul mouth about it.
People who say “faggot” are kind of still in high school. Same with those who offend others with references to their masculinity or femininity.
And the Wall Street Journal editorial page, so obsessed with profit, is, secretly, poor. On the inside.
it’s really just a liberal term of endearment, charming.
Ignore the cockslapping part in the faggot attributed to a 2 year old in your defense of the indefensible Actus…so you…
Follow me around some Sunday afternoon when I am doing the public service of trying to prevent some lefty blogs from being mere echo chambers. I get rejected almost as much as the Saturday night before.
Or just ask T Rex, he gave me the boot after one post.
I used to hang out at HotAir, commenting away. Then I got banned and had to find another blog to vociferously lurk upon.
I must say that I enjoy the PW community much more, if for no other reason than I can say “fuck” here without worrying too much about getting banned. Not that I like to just type fuck fuck fuck all the time, mind you, but its nice to know that I could if it was on-topic.
And now that I figured out what the you-know-what the “turing word” references are about, I feel like I just learned the secret handshake or something…
tw: theres, as in “therestishistory”
…I’m not sure if you’re really going to fit in then.
except when it’s obviously reading your mind and picking relevent words.
not this time….
Oh, maggie, I know all about that fucking thing’s creepy mindgames.
TW: I actually threw that “fuck” in there gratuitously. I wouldn’t have been surprised if the TW was “gratuitous,” actually. Oops.
IE “On my side of the asile, you call someone something like that and it is not the same as it is for your side of the asile”.
So Actus, maybe Lo Ping and Ozzie Guillen can attend some WMBA games and wipe the slate clean.
JayI,
Not exactly a elite.super_secret_elite email list, but something like that, yeah, I know what you mean.
TW: private
Whoa! What maggie k. just said.
Alan Turing was what Lo would call a, well, you know. He was arrested for committing what were considered lewd acts, forced to undergo hormone therapy and shortly thereafter committed suicide.
Brilliant man. Great loss.
I know that Mulder accused Occam’s Razor of being the last refuge of the unimaginative, but I’m going to go with the theory that Lo Ping was trying to attack me and my kid, actus, and he jumped to what he thought would be the most atrocious thing to say—and, not knowing when to apply the brakes—said it.
And even now is feeling a little creepy for doing so—which he’ll overcome by heading back to familiar environs for pats on the backs from other progressives who’ll tell him it’s all right, Goldstein can dish it out, yada yada yada.
Of course, this is about him bringing my kid into it. And me deleting his comments because it drives him insane.
Just the vibe I get off the guy.
M. Scott,
Nope. True fact. I forget the author, and I’m too lazy to look it up; but look fr the biography, Alan Turing: The Enigma. As I recall, Mr. Turing—who helped win WWII by developing the Enigma machine to crack German codes—was a homosexual. Post-WWII Britain rewarded him by hospitalizing and “treating” him, and thus crushing his spirit. If I recall correctly, it drove him to suicide. Pretty rotten way to treat a war hero.
Ie wishing that that those who find homosexuality offensive have gay loved ones? Not so bad. What is bad is having a foul mouth about it.
And Jeff finds homosexuality offensive? Proof?
And for the record, it’s not about hoping to score a little schaudenfreude for yourself. It’s about using a slur, not just a foul-mouthed word. Lo’s use of faggot was meant with disgust and contempt, and don’t try to tell me differently. I happen to be a cockslapping faggot, so I know.
TW: Board, dumb as a
Think of it this way: you can’t hold the moral high ground unless you take a position that is conspicuous for its courage. We know that lefties are much ‘better’ human beings than the rest of us mere mortals. They have to believe that they tread where even angels fear to go.
However, if nothing is actually wrong with homosexuality–!!!–then lo ping and his gang are just a band of empty poseurs with no particular claim to fame.
Therefore, in order for lefties to keep their self-consciously higher sense of morality inflated, homosexuals, blacks, Mexicans, the Little Guy, etc., must remain less than human to to them.
By George, I think I’ve got it!
tw: believe. Ya gotta.
You know, I just parsed out Sloping Wong’s comment. Faggot, in old common English, means a burning or smouldering piece of wood (which is why, I suppose, they call cigarettes “fags”). Cock is obviously a male chicken, ergo Sloping Wong thinks Jeff’s son will become a rooster-beating torch.
That dude just doesn’t make any fucking sense.
actus:
Is that why the LA Times won’t use the word “fa*got” or “ni*ger”? Even when a homophobic bigot uses them? Because of the “interpretive theory?”
Who said anything about obession?
“Lo Ping Wong”?
Any relation to Long Dong Silver?
Jeff,
I would like to say that I am sorry that someone claiming to be of the human race could stoop to such a level of discourse as this. If, as Thirsty said, someone did in fact make those comments about his child, I condemned that at that time.
You, Gunga Din, are a better man than I, as I would be turning the world upside down to find that asshole, and when I did, I would di di mou right to him.
Please don’t fear, Esera Tuaolo is here help Lo Ping Wong elevate the discourse. Maybe we can send him to NFL rookie camp so he can get some diversity lessons?
…or we should send him so that Warren Sapp can tie his dumbass to one of the up-rights with duct-tape.
Well, if anybody knows who this guy is—or knwos of a good way to find out—email me.
Long Dong Silver? That was a prosthesis, you know.
TW: purpose
Special Purpose?
Perhaps being a rump-ranger helped Turing with his code work. Because as any homo from the 30’s and 40’s knows, you have to speak in code all the time.
“I’m meeting my ‘tennis coach’ later to work on my ‘overhand serve’ and my ‘back hand’”
“Oh, I wasn’t expecting you Mom. I’m sorry I’m so sweaty, but Bruce and I were out back ‘digging post-holes’”
“Sorry Dad, I can’t have lunch with you. I’m cleaning my balls and then I’m going to go ask the club pro if I can ‘go off the back’ this evening.”
“Sorry Sis, I can’t make it to little Jimmy’s birthday party, Lo Ping Wong’s in town.”
Jeff,
This Lo Ping character is clearly unbalanced and he KNOWS YOUR NAME!!! Isn’t it time you:
1)Totally freak out.
2)Wet your pants.
3)Dismantle your blog.
4)Blame the proprietor of a blog you don’t like for Lo Pings comment.
5)Alert the FBI.
6)Troll friendly sites for sympathy hand jobs from all your ex-sycophants.
Hurry up Goldstein I hear Lo Pings parents let him stay out late during the summer. You’ll never be safe again!!!!!!!!
Does he? He sounds so worldly and educated and with it. I doubt it. But maybe he was in a frat or something, and maybe what they do in there cancels other stuff out.
Perhaps. I have no idea why people pick what to say when they want things that are offensive. This one rings of recent flaps. I’m sure people could come up with even more offensive things to say if they wanted the MOST atrocious. Sounds like he made a quick leap to the recent topic of cockslapping, as well as the thing with thers’ kid. But maybe he has no idea of that stuff.
Anyhoo, people who offend on the basis masculinity / sexual orientation? weird. Playing on other’s offense at that? not so.
The thing with Ther’s kid that I had nothing to do with?
Is there nothing vile you won’t act as an apologist for, actus?
Damn it, Jeff. If you had told us you were a cockslapping faggot at the Blogger Bash, we wouldn’t have had to go out and hire those Thai girls. You owe us $5.
TW: I hope my wife doesn’t see this.
You have put your finger on a real problem, Jeff, and in an effective way I couldn’t really on my blog because I try to keep it PG at worst. The “progressive” will feel free to say the world’s most offensive stuff when they turn on you, things they’d consider confirmation of your dark, evil flinty conservative heart if you said anything half so awful.
Consider the case of Clarence Thomas, Condoleeza Rice, and other prominent black Republicans and conservatives. What are they called? Aunt Jemimah, house niggers, and worse. By the left, the tolerant, unbigoted, non racist left.
The “progressive’s” hate is palpable at times.
Then don’t interpose, because I’m not sure you were asked.
actus:
Actus, was this homosexuality performed on you in a fraternity? Or did you perform it on your partner? Or am I misinterpreting your post and you are just speculating as to the possible propensity for buggery in fraternities?
acthole,
I’m going to break one of my own rules and answer you. (Please forgive me Oh Mighty Blog God)
I don’t think that “motivation” or “nuanced meaning” or “nuanced interpretation” are in any way releveant here. It doesn’t make a damn WHY he said what he said – it matters only that he said it. You don’t know me – or anything about me – but I will tell you if someone drug my children or grandchildren into something like this, I would take my considerable wealth and devote it to finding that person and PERSONALLY, with my own physical body, make sure that that person understood NEVER to such again. WHATEVER it took to make that impression.
Thinking liberals have long since fled the democratic party.
tw: room. There’s no room for us anymore.
And queer. One of my heros.
That says it all.
None.
Whatsoever.
Apart from the motive “someone held a gun to Lo Ping’s head”, which I kinda doubt, I’ll go along with that.
And leftists wonder why I call them reactionaries.
tw: fiscal, as in Jeff wants to fiscally locate this guy.
This Lo Ping guy’s a douche, but I gotta add that insult to my repertoire.
I’ll use it in a non-hateful way, though, I promise.
For the record, I meant to refer to the Democrats’ sorry post bellum record. Not that they were peaches ante bellum.
Cordially…
I don’t think I’ve ever seen my daughter so upset and distraught. Her wimpering produced a helpless pain that almost brought me to tears as well.
“Why Daddy, why does Jeff Goldstein have to make Satchel grow into a cockslapping faggot?” she asked.
Well, that did it. Racked with sobs I collapsed on the couch(as calmly as I could)and held her, hoping that the rage and fear would pass. After all, it’s been tough on both of us since her Mommy left, running off to join the Dykes on Bikes contingent in the LGBT Pride parade celebration that we attended as a family last weekend.
“Honey, I just don’t know”, I replied. “Perhaps he’s afraid that he’ll grow up and become an ignorant, obtuse troll like actus or Lo Ping Wong, or worse, become an Associate Professor at some podunk community college instead of realizing his potential to become a 5-tool, power-hitting, third baseman for the Rockies, thereby earning hundreds of millions of dollars and setting his parents up in an oceanside mansion in an exclusive, gated, waterfront development in Florida in their retirement years. I just don’t know.”
“Daddy, Lo Ping Wong bad.” she said.
actus
You see, the “progressive” goes to the racist, homophobic labels all the time because They view the world in groupings, not individuals. Political identity is their house of worship and there are Good Gays and Good Blacks that sit in the pews and respond promptly and correctly during the liturgy as rendered by Monk Markos or Anointed Andrew.
Those outside the church doors? They are the faggots, niggers, jewboys, crackers, etc. They will not accept that non-leftists are sincere in their values or intentions.
“Progressives” deal with the non-left as Islamists deal with infidels.
It’s called taqiyya … a strategy that holds that lying and dissembling to “unbelievers” is wholly acceptable because it protects and promotes the agenda of the Believers.
This is why the far-Left is found apologizing for Islamists …. like is attracted to like
I’m sure people could come up with even more offensive things to say if they wanted the MOST atrocious.
Like, ‘Jeff, your son could grow up to be just like Actus.’
Though if the wasp stings haven’t forced the surgical removal of the frontal lobes and genitals, he’s probably safe from that.
Actus values defending people who slur two year olds.
Oh, and photographing soldier’s coffins and funerals.
Let’s not forget about that.
Darleen, your words are like a velvet bludgeon of condensed verity, as corrosive to actus as holy water to a vampire.
And I’m not just sucking up. Maybe a little…
I know were not supposed to feed the actus and whatall (what”s up with that?!?!?), but I think what he;s is just try to say is (if I can be indulge to help you out hear, actus): is thusly:
If you say something homaphobicly at someone because your a bonaphide homaphobe, then have at it, Cletus, your a homaphobe, and devil take the hindmost. (Plus, homaphobia means your gay, so…)
BUT. (and this is a big but! so look sharply!) IF you think the OTHER guy is the homaphobe and you say a thing (“cockslapping faggot or whatever”) at him (or the boy), and just to RATTLE him, make him sweat? That’s TOTALY different. That’s not homaphobe, that’s just witty repartay.
Its a suttle distinction. Would not surprise me if dingers were not relly able to grasp it firmly.
I noticed some time ago when slogging through lefty blogs and comments that a favorite put-down/accusation of Republicans is that they routinely perform fellatio on one another. This was usually used as a euphemism (imagine!) for loyalty, agreement, or any other kind of beneficial association.
They say it like it’s a bad thing.
“Daddy, why do Liberals hate c**ksuckers?”
I noticed some time ago when slogging through lefty blogs and comments that a favorite put-down/accusation of Republicans is that they routinely perform fellatio on one another. This was usually used as a euphemism (imagine!) for loyalty, agreement, or any other kind of beneficial association.
They say it like it’s a bad thing.
“Daddy, why do Liberals hate c**ksuckers?”
With all due respect, Witheld, Bullshit. Personal attacks on an adult in this forum are distasteful, but not unexpected by such as actus and lo ping-a-ling-a-ding-dong, but attacking somebody by going after their child is cowardly and dispicable, and begs for a righteous ass-kicking.
Some lines you do not cross. Got a beef with me? Deal with me and leave my kids out of it.
tw: feel, as in feel the love
witheld is a satirist. And a good one. Actus? Just a parody of him/herself.
Actus, in all seriousness (so that I know what pronoun to use), are you male or female? I’m not sure you’ve ever said, and someone visiting from Patterico referred to you as “she” the other day.
Please let us know.
Psst, JayI, Witheld is a parody.
Perhaps it has to do with their interpretive theory? They reason being gay is no offense to themselves. Any offense is, basically, up to you.
Totally amusing.
I’m quite certain if people you deem to be conservative engaged in such behavior you’d say the same thing.
Your transparency is embarrassing, and what is funny is you actually think it is taken seriously.
Duh. its NOT about what you had to do with it.
actus:
Whose? Yours or Jeffs?
actus:
But what about the message? From the sender?
Ok, fake-but-accurate, right?
Never mind…
Ya done got Instalanched, Jeff!
And they march for peace because they close their eyes at night and dream of ovens…
actus:
That’s presuming that the basis of sexuality is basis for offense.
Uh, actus? You said that “Its about what you had to do with it.”
Jeff didn’t have anything to do with it.
The hell? It’s not?
that was a typo.
I knew it!
Witheld is from The Iraq War Was Wrong Blog!
Hee hee hee.
But what about the underlying question?
The question actus, I am trying to get is what about the underlying or original accusation, or question?
Robert Crawford, it never was. Unlike, say, the Townhouse folks, we do what we do for our own enjoyment, not for the approval of the cool crowd.
You’d think, as exquisitely sensitive as the moonbatterotti claim to be, that they’d call “foul” on someone using “Retardo Montelban” as a screen name – or is this a signal that they don’t have a problem with attacks on the mentally-challenged just as they appear to have no problem with attacking someone’s children?
Honestly, how can some of these folks even bear to face themselves in the mirror each morning?
I said its not about what he had to do with it. Its about an event that happened in this community. By this community i mean this blog and other blogs. It was discussed here and other places. It wasn’t really a big point. Just something i noticed. Jeff thinks the guy went for the most atrocious. I think he went somewhere in his mind, and got to cockslapping and kids based on whats been going on in this and other blogs.
is that what you’re asking about?