The latest press release from FIRE, which continues to expose the anti-intellectualism of the modern academy that a host of progressives continue to insist is nothing more than a paranoid fantasy of classical liberals:
Exposing a disturbing trend in campus censorship, Le Moyne College has fired its college newspaper’s adviser for not exercising more control over the student paper. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) joins the national organization of student newspaper advisers, College Media Advisers (CMA), in condemning Le Moyne’s actions. The staff of the Dolphin student newspaper has also staged a months-long strike in protest.
“This is only the latest example of the growing trend of increasing university control over student media,†stated FIRE President Greg Lukianoff. “If organizations and individuals do not take a stand to oppose this encroachment, the independent student media may become a thing of the past.â€Â
Professor Alan Fischler had served as adviser to Le Moyne’s newspaper, the Dolphin, since 1996, when he was chosen by the newspaper’s student staff. Fischler told FIRE that last November, he was dismissed as adviser when administrators told him that they wanted a more “hands-on†adviser who would supposedly make the newspaper a “showpiece†for the college. Fischler, who continues to teach at Le Moyne, will be replaced by an adviser hand-picked by administratorsâ€â€a move that has spurred the extended strike by the Dolphin’s student staff.
Fischler reports that the Dolphin did not shy away from criticizing Le Moyne’s administration. In fact, Fischler himself penned a column last year about Le Moyne’s wrongful dismissal of Scott McConnell, an education student whose case FIRE first brought to public attention. Fischler wrote, “I love Le Moyne…[a]nd in 17 years of teaching here I have never had occasion to feel ashamed of itâ€â€until now.â€Â
On May 3, CMA censured Le Moyne for its action, saying that the censure “serves as a warning…that Le Moyne fails to value the exercise of free speech and the value of a free press on the college campus.†Le Moyne’s demand that an adviser directly interfere with students’ work contravenes CMA ethical principles requiring that advisers “defend and teach without censoring, editing, directing or producing†the students’ content.
The trend toward administrative control of student press has been building for some time. In 2004, FIRE intervened at Missouri State University when the administration castigated the newspaper’s adviser for running a cartoon that was considered offensive by some Native Americans. In December of last year, FIRE joined an amicus brief in Lane v. Simon, a case in which the student newspaper adviser was dismissed at Kansas State University because of the paper’s low level of “diversity†coverage. And student press freedom was dealt another blow in February, when the Supreme Court refused to hear arguments in Hosty v. Carter. FIRE had written an amicus brief for that case, in which administrators at Governors State University censored a student newspaper that was critical of the administration.
“Le Moyne acted heavy-handedly, without even attempting to discuss its concerns with Fischler before firing him,†stated Lukianoff. “If independent student papers are to survive, students and faculty must resist administrative attempts to take control of the student press.â€Â
[my emphases]
Control the message and you control all. And if the last few years have taught us anything, it is that free speech is appreciated far more in theory than in practice by those who have a vested interest in retaining control of a narrative—or in shaping new narratives to reinforce their agendas.
In the case of university administrators, they tend to be happiest when the perception of their campus is one of happy diversity—so long as the diversity is superficial, and the collegiality is a result of tepid, non-offensive messages.
We have entered the age of the Stepford Campus, I’m afraid. And we must either fight back, or else give up the old system as terminally ill and move on to something new.

Funny, I spend most of my time in the Acadmey and have yet to be hassled for my non-liberal views.
People who cherry pick this much MUST be illegal immigrants.
While this is annoying and bad, I think it really is one of the first signs of the fall of this kind of institutionalized academic bias. 10 years ago it was hard to find anything other than complaints of particularly eggregious PC enforcement. Now you can find whole websites packed with evidence of academic bias and crushing of dissent by the commissars of the campus. Evan Coyne Maloney’s movie about this is due out soon – catch it if you can, and if you can’t, work on getting it shown in your town.
These guys need to get with the program. At my university it was quite easy to get the admin’s views in the paper. All they had to do was write the extensive press release and it would be regurgitated. Its the lesson of every PR professional: do the reporter’s work for them
It boggles the mind that there’s anyone left in any remotely political milieu—and a modern university is nothing if not political—who doesn’t realize this.
But I suppose if the going fiction is that they “can’t get their message out,” they should at least be congratulated on their efforts at verisimilitude.
In the defense of their incompetence, this lemoyne place looks like a small college, rather than a large university like the one I went to.
But its great that FIRE is taking on a Catholic/Jesuit school. Hopefully this will extend to other denominational colleges. I’ve always found that a big hole in their philosophy. They seem to not mind speech codes and other intolerance so long as its advertised strongly. I hope this changes.
Speech codes are the death of the university. Smallminded PC bigots trying to stifle criticism and debate.
FIRE is great! The reality on campus is a lot worse than you can possibly know from the outside. Too many administrators and faculty love their power and control, like the fascists they typically are.
Ah, the local Inquisition U. They just got sued, and lost. An education major had the audacity to believe in corporal punishment and said so. This guy wrote a paper about it, and got an “A” for the paper in class. Then the PC police stepped in and kicked him out out of school.
You can hardly tell it is a Catholic school, but you can be certain the administration doesn’t believe in an open exchange of ideas. These guys would kick Jesus out for driving the money changers out of the temple.
Whether their model is Alinsky, Gramsci, Marcuse or freakin’ Moby, the mainstream of American higher education is one of censorious, self-righteous, insular bolshevism and must be scorned, opposed and derided (as opposed to Derrida’d) at every opportunity.
Those who pay get final say. The end.
Very, very well said, Jeff.
Colleges should be required by law to put a disclaimer clarifying what exactly they mean by diversity and dialogue.