I saw a Court TV about all this and it was very eye opening. She made the guy miserable – wouldn’t call him – avoided him – and didn’t even go see him when he was dying. He cut her out of his will and rightly so. He wasn’t stupid. I really hope she gets nothing.
She might have made him miserable, but he married her. There had to be a point when he looked at her, looked in the mirror, acknowledged to himself he was so infirm he wet his bed, and realized she was marrying him for something other than undying love. I’m sure there was some old Edna out there that might have lovingly put his food through a blender.
He didn’t exactly marry her for love, either. He was a letch and she was a golddigger. Seemed like an even trade. As to whether she took undue advantage of him, that was a contested issue and so far the courts have decided in her favor.
This unanimous decision by the US S.Ct. reminds me of the only Supreme Court joke I know ( which actus probably hasn’t heard – given the poor grade in Con Law:
An appellate attorney opens his argument before the Supreme Court with: “May it please the Court, I am appealling a decision of the Ninth Circuit … and I have other arguments.”
Well this whole sad affair has ruined my dating scene. Every time I try to shack up with a Playboy centerfold model, my son shows up and boots her out. Since he knows where this is going and he’s not putting his inheritance of my vast fortune (mostly in aluminum cans and deposit soda bottles) in jeopardy.
An appellate attorney opens his argument before the Supreme Court with: “May it please the Court, I am appealling a decision of the Ninth Circuit … and I have other arguments.â€Â
I don’t understand. Can someone enlighten this clueless idiot (i.e., me)?
I am really worried that I could translate that in no time flat…
GOD BLESS THIS HONORABLE COURT!
Is that barrister’s wig… purple?
Quite the fashion statement. Either that or my monitor’s gone funky.
BINGO!!!
Thanks, Jeff. I needed that.
Oh, and thanks to the honorable Justices of the Supreme Court, who made this post possible. Them and the dead oil tycoon.
WOW! A pig in a wig.
Like it or not, the old geezer married her. The family shd have bought her off years ago and been done with it.
Hey, Anna Nicole’s cool. I bet she made that old coot very happy for the last year of his life. More than his no account son ever did.
Must be some bomb kharma you have there, Goldstein: ANS just keeps cooperatin’!
tw: ‘Course, pissin’ off tha’ sistas is a bonus.
I don’t know what all the fuss is, I understand her perfectly! …but then again I am pretty hammered so I guess it’s all relative.
Tim Maguire
I saw a Court TV about all this and it was very eye opening. She made the guy miserable – wouldn’t call him – avoided him – and didn’t even go see him when he was dying. He cut her out of his will and rightly so. He wasn’t stupid. I really hope she gets nothing.
She might have made him miserable, but he married her. There had to be a point when he looked at her, looked in the mirror, acknowledged to himself he was so infirm he wet his bed, and realized she was marrying him for something other than undying love. I’m sure there was some old Edna out there that might have lovingly put his food through a blender.
Men, don’t be stupid.
He didn’t exactly marry her for love, either. He was a letch and she was a golddigger. Seemed like an even trade. As to whether she took undue advantage of him, that was a contested issue and so far the courts have decided in her favor.
link
howe,
Thanks for the link. That is more even handed than the show I saw. They definitley made it out that she was a liar and not good to him.
I agree that he is was a letcher.
Like the Rick James Superfreak merkin on her head.
A letch?
A golddigger?
you guys are soooo cynical!
too funny
I must be drunk-I completely understood that after only two reads!
T/W: early— “You’re right! I probably won’t be getting up early tomorrow morning…”
Apperently, it’s easier to translate through the filter of “A” Bud, than it does through “the” bud.
tw: woman, or more appropriately: “womnnen”.
Man that was way to easy….I gotta cut down on the sauce….either that or get over my crippling octagenarian marriage fetish…something.
by the way, I’m amazed you haven’t done any Rockies Gloating lately. You’ve earned the right to, so far anyway.
This unanimous decision by the US S.Ct. reminds me of the only Supreme Court joke I know ( which actus probably hasn’t heard – given the poor grade in Con Law:
An appellate attorney opens his argument before the Supreme Court with: “May it please the Court, I am appealling a decision of the Ninth Circuit … and I have other arguments.”
It is kind of scary that I read that completely normally. Or maybe Jeff is losing his touch.
The reason it was easy to read is, Anna Nicole had to sober up for her Supreme Court appearance, and that was only—what, three months ago?
She’s nowhere near as flame-broiled yet as she was for her previous PW appearances.
Well this whole sad affair has ruined my dating scene. Every time I try to shack up with a Playboy centerfold model, my son shows up and boots her out. Since he knows where this is going and he’s not putting his inheritance of my vast fortune (mostly in aluminum cans and deposit soda bottles) in jeopardy.
Thanks, Jeff! Great work, as always.
I don’t understand. Can someone enlighten this clueless idiot (i.e., me)?