19 Replies to “Shannon Elizabeth comments on the Nobel Peace Prize being awarded to U.N. nuclear watchdog agency, IAEA, and its head, Mohamed El Baradei”

1. shank says:

   October 7, 2005 at 3:23 pm

   Mmm…antigravity bra.

2. Allah says:

   October 7, 2005 at 3:24 pm

   SEXIST!

3. Joe says:

   October 7, 2005 at 3:26 pm

   Nonsense. Shannon’s breasts are fully defined by the Perky Nipple Postulate, or PNP, which clearly states; “Perky nipples. Is there anything they can’t do?”

4. Wes says:

   October 7, 2005 at 3:29 pm

   That Shannon is one articulate bimbo.

5. AWG says:

   October 7, 2005 at 3:38 pm

   Although observation is evidently necessary to bring about the transition from possible to actual, the fundamental nature of observation in quantum theory remains somewhat mysterious. This problem of measurement derives from the fact that, prior to observation the quantum is described as being a nonlocal wave of probability spread throughout space, while after observation only one of the possible values is actualized. Thus, observation involves a discontinuous “collapse” (also called a “projection”) of the quantum wave function from a continuum of possibilities to a single actualized value. This projection, however, is an ad hoc element of the formalism, and is not a lawful transformation that is governed by Schrödinger’s wave equation. There is no explanation for how, when, or where this mysterious projection happens. Moreover, when the projection takes place, the laws of quantum physics do not predict which of the possible values will be actualized in any given observation, thus violating classical determinism and introducing an element of acausality and spontaneity into the theory at a fundamental level.

   In other words, Shannon Elizabeth’s boobies continually defy gravity because they have been observed to do so.  I’m not sure exactly how Shannon collapses the probability wave without her mammaries experiencing a similar “collapse” due to Earth’s gravity, but I postulate it may be a corrolary to the “standing wave” function generated in the pants of heterosexual male observers of Shannon’s rack.

   TW: effect.  It’s all a matter of cause and effect, somehow.

6. Matt says:

   October 7, 2005 at 3:48 pm

   In her defense, Ms. Elizabeth’s fun bags have done at least as much to promote world peace (and adolescent stiffies) as Mr. ElBaradei.

7. charles austin says:

   October 7, 2005 at 3:50 pm

   This could also explain Bill Clinton’s latest salvo’s against President Bush.  After all, there seems to be no better method for obtaining a Nobel Peace Prize than being a high profile transnational Bush basher.

8. Brahma says:

   October 7, 2005 at 4:19 pm

   At what point does this “prize” (perhaps accurate as it is given without respect to having earned it) get renamed to the Nobel Anti-American Prize? Perhaps then Carter could become a two time recipient.

9. Cardinals Nation says:

   October 7, 2005 at 5:03 pm

   Shanon Elizabeth, huh?  Hmmph…I’ve had better.

   /hyperegodrive switched to “off”

10. M.Hallex says:

    October 7, 2005 at 5:10 pm

    “In her defense, Ms. Elizabeth’s fun bags have done at least as much to promote world peace (and adolescent stiffies) as Mr. ElBaradei.”

    Indeed.

    I am firmly convinced that the one thing that will bring mankind together will be gawking at particularly attractive women.

    Womankind will be brought together about 35 seconds later when they begin to complain about it.

11. Paul Zrimsek says:

    October 7, 2005 at 5:22 pm

    We need a quote from Lacan here. He had so very much to say about both quantum mechanics and bimbos.

12. mojo says:

    October 7, 2005 at 5:56 pm

    Shannon’s a FemBot, you know…

    Mohammed Dahlan told me so.

13. Master of None says:

    October 7, 2005 at 6:14 pm

    Shannon E. deserves the Nobel Piece Prize.

14. Matt Moore says:

    October 7, 2005 at 7:00 pm

    I’m sorry, is this a joke? Isn’t El Baradei the same guy who basically threw up his hand upon learning that both the Norks and the Iranians had restarted their nuclear programs?

    Between the BBC list of eleven leaders and this I’m starting to think that Asian chicken flu won’t be such a bad thing.

15. rls says:

    October 7, 2005 at 8:15 pm

    I’m on the Nobel Judging Committee and I think SE has a plausabile case.  Close observation and inspection is required, though.  Said rack should report to me immediately.

    tw: daily – I’ll probably have to observe daily.

16. c says:

    October 8, 2005 at 12:29 am

    What the Nobel Peace committee knows about physics:  a lot about p-branes and a little about red giants before they collapse into white dwarves. 

    But, who’s Shannon Elizabeth?

17. CraigC says:

    October 8, 2005 at 3:58 pm

    A much nicer rack.  Sorry, Shannon.

18. Merovign says:

    October 8, 2005 at 7:23 pm

    Well, I guess it’s official. The Nobel Peace Prize, much abused, has finally given up the ghost. It’s departed this vale of tears, shuffled off its mortal coil, the Nobel Dove has been flushed.

    I don’t know why this is so annoying, I mean, Arafish got one.

    And unlike some of the men here, I’m not above dating Shannon Elizabeth. Just so you know.

    And Hallex has a point, one in which Iran can in fact play a part. Have you seen Iranian women? Damn! Once Iran is liberated, watch for a takeover of international swimsuit modeling!

    And speaking iran, today’s Turing Word is nuclear, how appropriate.

19. the secret says:

    May 22, 2008 at 9:14 am

    I got a spam e- mail today with the subject line of:

Comments are closed.