Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Left vs. Right: part one of my interview with the Washington Times

Joseph Cotto, who writes the “Conscience of a Realist” column for the Washington Times’ Communities section, recently contacted me for an interview in which is discussed the ideological layout of the contemporary blogosphere (along with my part in it).  Part one of that interview can be read here.

— Followed, inevitably, by disparaging words from tim b. and maybe even EricPWJohnson in the comments, unless I miss my guess.

47 Replies to “Left vs. Right: part one of my interview with the Washington Times”

  1. Slartibartfast says:

    Very good, Jeff! I expect that will provoke some kind of outraged disagreement to the left and right of you.

    Exactly what is needed, I think.

  2. Slartibartfast says:

    What’s the over-under on first WashTimes comment referring to you as “Jeffy”, though? Who, and how long will it take?

  3. Pros: Eloquent, reasoned, concise.

    Cons: No armadillo references.

  4. Darleen says:

    Just read it … excellent! And the first commenter there agrees.

  5. Blake says:

    Excellent interview, Jeff.

    Congratulations.

  6. SBP says:

    Nice!

  7. Car in says:

    It is most excellent.

    A Jeff- primer, so far.

  8. DarthLevin says:

    Well done, boss. When’s part two? Can’t wait!

  9. leigh says:

    Very nice, Jeff!

  10. Dale Price says:

    Looking forward to additional installments!

  11. Physics Geek says:

    Congratulations, Jeff. Well done as always. I’m glad that you’re finally getting your Hobbity, Visigothy message out there. It’s not like those code words are gonna speak themselves, right? I am looking forward to rest of the interview. Keep us posted.

  12. bh says:

    Good deal, Jeff.

  13. palaeomerus says:

    “Jeffy”

    Jeffsterino

  14. RI Red says:

    Just so you realize there is no echo-chamber here, I thought it sucked, Jeff. Way too much rationality and no emoting or listening to your feelings.

  15. palaeomerus says:

    I was upset about the lack of a centerfold.

  16. dicentra says:

    The food was awful and the portions too small.

  17. dicentra says:

    Wait…

  18. Bob Belvedere says:

    Joseph F. Cotto: Not so long ago, you were an academic and fiction writer. Did this prepare you for blogging?

    You forgot to mention that, yes, it did, because everything the left claims is fiction.

    [Well done, by the way — looking (leaning???) forward to Part II]

  19. SurfinCowboy says:

    Nice. Look forward to part 2. I especially liked this: “The right-leaning blogosphere tends to be far more self-critical. It runs as a kind of far-flung debating society…”

    So true in the places I like to go. Often when reading comments on almost any blog/news entry you see discussion among the “right” and blind conformity on the “left” – as well as people who love contrails, lizard-people, etc.

    Good interview. You even got “hobbits” in there. Heh. :)

  20. […] take the time to click here and read it all and check out the Comments section of Jeff’s post on the […]

  21. dicentra says:

    Speaking of contrails, I was surprised by how many of the callers to Coast-to-Coast AM insinuated that the Tea Party was responsible. I fully expected the standard “truther” tropes (which abounded) but not the creepy observations that it happened in “Boston. Get it? Tea Party?” (to commemorate 16 Dec 1773, no doubt). Another creep insisted that the Sandy Hook people were the targets because they had VIP seating near the finish line, and the explosions coincided with Sandy Hook people completing the race.

    Not that the VIP seating box was on the other side of the street from the bomb, but whatevs…

    What kind of tax-protesting teabagger plans his Big Boom on Tax Day and then goes after a foot race? I doubt very much that tax day or Patriot’s Day is part of the calculation: it’s got to be either a grudge against the marathon or just a desire to blow up a crowd of people—any people.

    For the sake of mayhem.

    I hate humanity sometimes.

    OK, all the time.

  22. leigh says:

    The Sandy Hooksters better keep looking over their shoulders. Three’s the charm, after all.

  23. geoffb says:

    Good interview. I hope it gets some traction out there, and some traffic back here.

  24. DarthLevin says:

    You know why you hate humanity, right, di?

    Mind-control chemicals dispersed via aerosol in… you guessed it…

    Contrails. From invisible jets using Area 52 technology.

    The TRVTH Is Out There™

  25. ThomasD says:

    Area 52?

    They built another one?

    Damn Feds, like rabbits.

  26. dicentra says:

    Mind-control chemicals dispersed via aerosol in… you guessed it…

    Contrails.

    It was the contrail chems that made the planes burn so hot that they melted steel, see.

  27. JHoward says:

    I was surprised by how many of the callers to Coast-to-Coast AM insinuated that the Tea Party was responsible.

    I never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever thought knowing what this country was founded to do and what it was so founded upon and how that all worked would make us adult normals radical extremists in our lifetimes.

    I hate humanity sometimes.

    Did I mention how fast this all came on? And how about half of who I know are deep, deep into it like donkeykings?

  28. JHoward says:

    It was the contrail chems that made the planes burn so hot that they melted steel, see.

    On the other hand, GMOs really do suck. So they have that. And Monsanto.

    And Big Pharma, the government school system — but I repeat myself — and family law. It’s a spectrum.

  29. beemoe says:

    Good job, boss.

    And congrats to squid on the promotion.

  30. Squid says:

    Does the promotion come with a raise?

  31. beemoe says:

    Only if you’re crooked.

  32. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Sure. Instead of a single daily morale-boosting beating, you can have two.

  33. Mike G. says:

    Good job Jeff. Looking forward to part two.

  34. Jeff G. says:

    Was waiting for the first lefty to head over there and trash me. Took longer than I expected.

  35. palaeomerus says:

    That a list of all of Slippery Slope’s various issues with us Jeff. Straw man a-hoy!

  36. Ernst Schreiber says:

    I finally got around to reading the piece. Overall I thought it was good, but your last answer got, I think, a little too inside-basebally. Maybe not. I’m a bit of a premature old-fart, so maybe the wider blogosphere knows what you mean by Hobbits better than I think they do.

    Also, you swear too much to be taken entirely seriously.

    I say that as someone who has to consciously remind himself to not greet the priest with “hey Father, how the fuck are ya?” on Sundays, so, I hope you take that as honest criticism and not nitpicking prudery.

  37. happyfeet says:

    hey i swear all the time

  38. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Thank you for proving my point.

  39. beemoe says:

    A true blue Democrat sees the word “accountability” he knows something is up, paleo.

    Hilarious,

  40. beemoe says:

    I’m a bit of a premature old-fart

    That might be the understatement of the year.

  41. sdferr says:

    Cotto sounds like a fluffer — of the establishment.

  42. sdferr says:

    Oh, and by the by, what historically goes hand in hand with polygamy?

    Eunuchs!

    Which, not that there’s anything wrong with that, right?

  43. Slartibartfast says:

    Which, not that there’s anything wrong with that, right?

    It’s pretty decent, as operating systems go.

Comments are closed.