18 Replies to “Good question.”

1. Hubris says:

   April 29, 2005 at 2:15 pm

   I think it would be easier to go the other way, stern headmistress:  “Well, Mr. Hubris, you’re going to have to do something to earn better marks this term.”

   And a lot of Ketel One.  And Some meth.  And I’d like her to have a really close shave that day.

2. Daniel says:

   April 29, 2005 at 2:29 pm

   And some frilly lace panties….

3. gail says:

   April 29, 2005 at 2:34 pm

   The nuns used to be very strict about patent leather shoes. NOT ALLOWED, DUDE. You can see the reflection of our panties.

4. Diana says:

   April 29, 2005 at 2:36 pm

   .. only if you forgot the bloomers.

5. Keiran Halcyon says:

   April 29, 2005 at 2:51 pm

   Oy. Color me disgusted.

6. Chrees says:

   April 29, 2005 at 3:07 pm

   Only if you have a strong stomach.

   Just got back from vacation. Since when did RWS become a “Say Anything” model?

7. Alpha Baboon says:

   April 29, 2005 at 3:21 pm

   Hey, how come its so ’naughty‘ to catch a glimpse of panties, but these hip hop guys can wear their pants halfway down their ass an no one says a word ? If my eyes dont deceive me there’s something going wrong around here…

8. Sean M. says:

   April 29, 2005 at 3:46 pm

   It’s because good Catholic school girls aren’t supposed to want you to see their underwear, AB.  The hip hop guys apparently don’t care so much, so it’s not such a big deal.

   In other words, seeing some teenage Eminem wannabee’s shorts=everyday ocurrence.

   Seeing the reflection of a Catholic school girl’s panties in her patent leather shoes=priceless.

   (And I know how creepy I sound.  I’m just trying to make a common sense point.)

9. MarkS says:

   April 29, 2005 at 3:59 pm

   If “hit” is slang for “have sex with”, most certainly not.  If it’s slang for “slap with a raw fish” or something similar, the answer’s still no, as she’s not unattractive enough to merit corporal punishment.

10. MC says:

    April 29, 2005 at 4:29 pm

    Who knew? Charles and Camilla = same sex marriage.

11. gail says:

    April 29, 2005 at 4:35 pm

    Plus, Sean M & AB, hip-hop boy booty is not particularly alluring.

12. JWebb says:

    April 29, 2005 at 4:42 pm

    More appropriate: Shiny metal shoes and a leather saddle.

13. Alpha Baboon says:

    April 29, 2005 at 4:50 pm

    Gail, I’ll bet Ginsberg would beg to differ..

14. Robin Roberts says:

    April 29, 2005 at 4:54 pm

    MC, I didn’t know.

    But I suspected.

15. gail says:

    April 29, 2005 at 5:01 pm

    With or without spurs JW?

16. Mike Caldwell says:

    April 29, 2005 at 5:05 pm

    1. Remove Camilla’s photo and replace with that chick with the “Celebrate Diversity” shirt with all the cool pistols.

    2. Dress in outfit Jeff describes above, assuming it’s a kilt or plaid short skirt.

    3. Make the socks duurty….and maybe one sagging down.

    4. Bandaid on one knee.  Umm.

    5. Messy hair.  Slight sweat smell.  Yeah, that’s it.

    6. Field Hockey stick.  Sweet Jesus.

    Uh.  I gotta go.

    Spam word needed…maybe God is watching?

    Yikes.

    5. Field Hockey stick.  Sweet Jesus.

17. Fred Schoeneman says:

    April 29, 2005 at 5:13 pm

    Mark,

    To answer your question, the one does not necessarily exclude the other.  You could be “hitting it” in the “porking” sense, say, from the male superior doggy position, and you could at the same time physically “hit” it with a mackerel or a monkfish or a nice halibut, right on the cheeks.

    f

18. Fred says:

    April 29, 2005 at 9:08 pm

    Ick.  Just “ick”.

    Turing word: “morning” as in “How hard would you be hating on yourself if you woke up to that in the…”

Comments are closed.