Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Hoyer: by way of the Constitution, the Chief Executive has prosecutorial discretion to ignore laws passed by the Legislative branch

Or, put another way, according to the number 3 Democrat, the President has the Constitutional right to rule as a dictator, and the Constitution essentially provides for a complete rejection of the notion of separation of powers the framers put in place to prevent a dictatorial centralized authority of the kind they’d just fought a revolution to free themselves of.

— Which, that sounds about right. Just so long as chief executives don’t start acting like imperial presidents. Like that evil Chimpy McHitlerburton did. When he, you know, did all that stuff that was, like, imperial and all.

Racists.

23 Replies to “Hoyer: by way of the Constitution, the Chief Executive has prosecutorial discretion to ignore laws passed by the Legislative branch”

  1. Drumwaster says:

    When in the course of human events…

    Remember that I said “by 2025”, and start stocking ammo.

  2. Pablo says:

    So, the Holder/Issa meeting was not productive and the contempt vote goes forward tomorrow.

  3. sdferr says:

    That Jack Goldsmith book is coming? Right? Or if he won’t be writing anew on the subject, surely he’ll be speaking out in public? Right? I mean, from Goldsmith’s thesis against Bush (even against the better established Presidential commander-in-chief powers, no less), this usurpation of legislative authority is clearly a big deal. Right?

  4. cranky-d says:

    I’m issuing my contempt vote for the vast majority of the left, and the entirety of the current administration, right now.

  5. leigh says:

    I predicted this turn of events *removes Karnack hat*

    So, after Ricky is held in contempt, then what? Janet Reno was held in contempt and still worked two full terms.

  6. sdferr says:

    I swear I think I just heard Obama proclaim that our political differences stop at the water’s edge. This, he’s saying about criticism of him, spoken by someone who’s at home! It’s Obama that’s abroad bad-mouthing the United States. What a putz.

  7. leigh says:

    Yup. Whatta putz.

    Did you hear him say “blah blah underlying strength of Europe’s economies blah blah” The man is clueless.

  8. palaeomerus says:

    TV has made many voters conclude that intelligence is indicated a tone of voice and cadence that they like. And big words. They don’t even have to be the right words. Just big. Obama could give a speech and say that economic amniocentesis and inverted formative streptococcus micro parallax chart shifts prove that the private sector is doing fine and Chris Matthew sure isn’t going to call him on it.

  9. Alec Leamas says:

    Cool. I can’t wait for President Romney to sign an executive order exercising prosecutorial discretion not to enforce laws regulating the importation of automatic weapons. And, as the Justice Department tells us, because the Federal government has chosen not to enforce its own laws, the states have no business fucking around with my shipment of H&K MP5s.

  10. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Democrats ought to find this level of shamelessness shameful. That they don’t is embarrassing.

  11. leigh says:

    Yeah. I thought they were bad during Clinton’s impeachment. I lost all faith in government (not too far a leap) when all the wimmins in his cainet trooped out and announced, one at a time, “I believe him!” when he said “I never lied. Not one time.”

  12. leigh says:

    cabinet, that is

  13. sdferr says:

    “I would point out that we have one president at a time and one administration at a time,” Obama said. “And I think traditionally the notion has been that America’s political differences end at the water’s edge.”

    This cocksucker Obama and his Democrat pals gave George Bush’s war policy just such precious deference while men were in the field fighting and dying, didn’t they? Oh, wait, no, they didn’t.

  14. SDN says:

    Too. Dishonest. For. Civil. Society.

    sdferr, these people lie like they breathe.

  15. B Moe says:

    I think Hoyer must have studied Con Law at the University of Chicago.

  16. Slartibartfast says:

    Oh. Well. As much as I don’t like this, Hoyer may have a certain point. Obama could have preemptively pardoned some illegals, then used his powers as president to grant them work visas. Bingo.

    But he didn’t do that, as far as I can tell.

    In fact, he hasn’t yet written executive orders to do anything of the kind.

  17. Slartibartfast says:

    Just so everyone has a quick reference of XOs.

  18. sdferr says:

    OT, save for the House connection: C-Span 3 will be covering the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee meeting to vote on a contempt of Congress citation for Eric Holder, live at 10:00 am eastern.

  19. sdferr says:

    Andrew McCarthy:

    Nevertheless, immigration is only the context of the president’s latest usurpation. It is a critically important issue, yes, but the real gravity of what Obama has done lies not in the subject matter of his edict but in the authoritarian assumptions of its issuance. They transcend mere arrogance: the president proposes to eviscerate our constitutional system. He claims nothing less than the dictatorial power to pronounce what the law is. This usurpation, moreover, complements the dictatorial powers he has already claimed to enforce only the laws of his choosing and to use the police powers of his office to deprive the sovereign states and the people of their constitutional prerogatives and rights.

  20. McGehee says:

    sdferr, these people lie like they breathe.

    For too long?

    […]

    ‘Scuse me y’all, the Secret Service is at my door.

Comments are closed.