 |
“So then I look Paula Zahn right in the eye and say, ‘I don’t believe I owe an apology, baby. I don’t know if the people of 9-11 specifically wanted to kill everybody that was killed. It was just worth it to them in order to do whatever it was they decided it was necessary to do that bystanders be killed. And that essentially is the same mentality, the same rubric.’”* | |
 |
“Yeah, edgy, man. But tell Billy the truth. That’s a water gun, am I right? ”* |
****
the “a negative X a negative = a positive” update: fake Indian x fake Indian stories = tenure. Simple math, really.
I like the decor in his living room – firebrand eclectic.
Looks like Ward’s been a naughty boy…
Spambuster word: sense
I just saw that piece too, mojo. Looks like Paul Campos has adopted Ward Churchill as his current project. To be honest, I didn’t think Campos had it in him.
I’m looking forward to see how his “students” sputter and whine about this.
Yup, Ward’s a fraudulent hack…with tenure.
Nah, now he’s got something in common with Michael Jackson and toasted english muffins.
All are toast.
Churchill is now going to be footnoted alongside Bellesiles.
But tell Billy the truth. That’s a water gun, am I right?
Yeah, dude. A water gun filled with the righteous anger of oppressed peoples around the world who are sick of Hegemonic Corporate Amerikkka crushing them with the evil boot of fascistic capitalism. “Free Bobby Seale!!”
So just exactly how pretentious does one have to be to use the word “rubric” in a sentence?
I can tell this would be the sort of person I’d HATE the second I saw him regardless of politics. What a self-serving, egotistical, Bohemian hack.
Later,
bbeck
PS: lol, Craig.
As pretentious as John Kerry at least.
Or maybe Al Gore.
Flaming Piece of Shit Left on Faculty Chair.
Now, that’s funny!
Iowahawk has been on a roll.
On, in, whatever.
Ward is supposed to be on Michael Medved’s radio show at 4:00 CST.
Give him a buzz.
Scratch that. Ward isn’t on, one of his supporters is. My mistake. Yes, I’m a dope.
turing word: wrong. Yes, I know, you don’t have to rub it in….
Shouldn’t a tenured professor be able to speak intelligibly? By the end, he’s just throwing out vocab words in hopes of creating a sufficiently opaque cloud of obfuscation to obscure the hollowness of his so-called “point.”
More More More
the “a negative X a negative = a positive†update: fake Indian x fake Indian stories = tenure. Simple math, really.”
Have you checked with Derbyshire on that?