10 Replies to “The Martha Stewart Chronicles, day 98”

1. JimK says:

   January 13, 2005 at 12:38 am

   I’m so offended by this blatant lesbianism, right here on the internet where any child could see it.  It is nothing less than a sin against God.  You should be struck from the earth, sir, for you are a sinner.

   Wait…the tingle and the semi means I’m offended, right?  Or…wait…

   Nevermind.  My bad.  I thought I…nevermindigottagoseeamanaboutamonkey.

2. Robin Roberts says:

   January 13, 2005 at 12:42 am

   Oh, my god, prison has driven her insane if she wants to buy a made-for-TV set of tupperware.

   The turing test?  “she” of course.  How did it know I was an H.Rider Haggard fan?

3. Scott P says:

   January 13, 2005 at 12:49 am

   “dorsal bat cave”

   My, Martha has a way with words.  I hope the girls have something special planned for day 100.

4. capitano says:

   January 13, 2005 at 3:40 am

   I for one appreciate these practical Supperware tips for stretching my food dollar.

5. CraigC says:

   January 13, 2005 at 4:06 am

   Dorsal: [adj] (biology) facing away from the axis of an organ or organism;

   Wow, if she has a batcave there, prison life has altered her in ways we can’t imagine.

6. Gerard Van der Leun says:

   January 13, 2005 at 4:31 am

   What’s with cutting off THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE!

   Put it all UP!

7. cthulhu says:

   January 13, 2005 at 6:09 am

   Perhaps I shouldn’t just assume that you’ve researched this, but is it true that you can’t actually sue anybody for defamation while you’re in the slammer? I mean, she has to wait until she gets out before her legal beagles go berserk, right?

   ‘Cause it’s been a must-read for me every day and I wouldn’t want to miss a single one before she gets sprung….

8. The BigHindTrunk - Powerwhine says:

   January 13, 2005 at 6:51 am

   Libel laws being what they are for “public persons,” sueing for defamation is a losing proposition.

   Martha could, however, theoretically sue herself, her namebrand and corporation for self-defamation. Caselaw is compelling and the evidence supporting such a suit would be easily accessible in the public record. Martha Stewart Omnimedia’s Libel Insurance is also underwritten by Lloyd’s of London, where Ms Stewart holds a permanent board seat. So it’s a win-win, in our view.

   In addition, the royalties and spin-off possibilities of her “chronicles” may prove to be the essential liquid financial stopgap during her transition to civilian life. As such, we can anticipate continued lascivious lesbian depravity into the the third quarter of ‘06.

9. gail says:

   January 13, 2005 at 3:42 pm

   Gerard, Martha’s page has no bottom.

10. Jon says:

    January 13, 2005 at 4:13 pm

    okay.. that tupperware set is COOL…

    lids that can fit on any container… a necessity!

Comments are closed.