Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Archives

An observation, conservatives

Michele Bachmann, leading early in the primaries, was attacked as a flake, a wild-eyed zealot, crazy. She crashed in the polls. Rick Perry, entering the race as a putative front runner, was attacked for a rock on leased property, for being a slow-witted Texan with racist tendencies who liked to fry him up some humans on death row. He crashed in the polls. Herman Cain, enjoying a sudden rise thanks to being an amiable straight shooter, is attacked as a potential serial sexual harasser based on sealed settlements from the 90s, then deemed disqualified from the Presidential race for his failure to lie effectively — or at least, in a way that might convince conservative pundits that he’d be able to tamp down on media scandals, even as we ourselves do the work Politico began. How he holds up in the polls is anyone’s guess. But there’s clearly a move on in GOP circles to bring him down — to leave him like Bachmann or Palin before him, labeled “unelectable.”

Me, I see a pattern.

To borrow a phrase, I haven’t left the Republican Party. The Republican Party has left me. Good riddance.

44 Replies to “An observation, conservatives”

  1. scooter says:

    Where does that leave us in the next election, though? I don’t foresee a viable 3rd-party candidate so we’re left either staying at home next November OR splitting the Republican vote, making the possibility of another 4 years of Obama much more likely.

    It really feels like a no-win situation. Maybe it will be necessary to either replace or reform the current GOP but how bad will THAT hangover be?

  2. Abe Froman says:

    Aside from the fact that Bachmann is a freak and Perry can’t debate his way out of a wet paper bag, I agree.

  3. Carin says:

    Scooter, where it leaves us is with Romney, of course.

    It is his turn.

  4. DarthLevin says:

    I’m willing to state, here and now, that I will NEVER vote for Romney. Not in a primary, not in a general, not for dogcatcher.

  5. McGehee says:

    The Republican Party is an illusion, a phantom. It is a wing of the Democrat Party, pretending to be its opposition.

    Get thee away from me, GOP — I know you not.

  6. sdferr says:

    “It is his turn” admirably expresses the other truth(!) they’d have us tell: “You have no choice at your choice.”

    Our question is: Oh, really?

  7. scooter says:

    I feel a moral obligation to vote for anyone who is not Obama. And that’s not hyperbole.

    The idea that that will require “pulling the lever”/pushing the button for Romney will make it feel more like “taking my medicine” than voting might otherwise.

    Again, though, there is the mortifying argument to made that maybe we do need another 4 years of Obama in order to well and truly dismantle the current GOP and build some better in its place, but at what price? Come to think of it, Romney might achieve the same end if he’s as bad as I rather expect.

    Either way, it will be a long 4 years for America. On top of what it already sure to be a long 4 years.

  8. Spiny Norman says:

    The pattern of Barack Obama’s political career has been to have his main opposition eliminated from the ballot, be that person a Democrat or Republican, either by having the candidate disqualified or by forcing them into withdrawing from the race.

    Why is the GOP doing his dirty work for him?

  9. Abe Froman says:

    The only way I’d vote for Romney in the general is if it looks like we’ve got more strong TEA Party peeps heading to congress. Romney’s enough of a sackless loser that his own party can roll him if there’s a critical mass that has the will to do so. But otherwise, we might as well let boy loser have another term so he can burn the house down with the blazing heat of his fuckwitted incompetence. Then we can rule Dystopia!!!

  10. Carin says:

    1) there is no way I wouldn’t vote and
    2) there is no way I’d vote for Obama

    But, until I am faced with that – I am not willing to settle. And the next person who argues that I need to support someone who can win, I’m gonna punch them in the face.

  11. Spiny Norman says:

    By the way: now that Herman Cain has been effectively eliminated, who will be the next Republican to get borked for having the temerity to challenge Mittens Obama?

  12. Physics Geek says:

    Aside from the fact that Bachmann is a freak and Perry can’t debate his way out of a wet paper bag, I agree.

    So we’ve finally reached the end game, where the ability to appear glib on television trumps all actual experience and success.

    Saying we’re fucked doesn’t begin to cover it.

  13. Carin says:

    Abe, that would be our only hope – that the tea party could ride Romney like their bitch.

  14. sdferr says:

    I doubt that Abe is looking for glib, as opposed to more forthcomingly substantive, but I’m just guessing as to Abe’s view. For my part, I like Gov Perry well enough to vote for him, but to close the deal it’s up to him to articulate his grasp of our mutually agreeable principles in depth — he doesn’t help himself by assuming I will guess what he understands.

  15. Spiny Norman says:

    So we’ve finally reached the end game, where the ability to appear glib on television trumps all actual experience and success.

    We reached that a while ago. How else did we get the Teleprompter Jesus in the White House?

  16. DarthLevin says:

    I will surely vote. But never again will I pull the lever for someone whom I know wishes to increase the power of the federal government. Rather than hold my nose, I’ll write in the candidate of my choice or vote for the least objectionable of the Other Party bottom feeders. I *refuse* to give my vote to someone who advocates for less freedom for me and my family.

  17. Ernst Schreiber says:

    From The Other McCain’s Smitty I learn that at least one MBM outlet isn’t completely opposed to all Republican candidates:

    One of Mitt Romney’s oldest Democratic supporters says the Republican presidential contender is a “warm” and “decent” person who is only masquerading as a die-hard conservative to win the Republican nomination. “Obviously the positions that Mitt’s taking now are different than the positions he did when he ran for and served as Governor of Massachusetts,” Rocky Anderson, the former mayor of Salt Lake City, told HuffPost. “His handlers got to him and said, ‘This is what you need to do.’ And that’s what he’s doing to get elected.”

    So hey! We’ve got that going for us.

    Unfortunately, Both Rocky Anderson and Ann Coulter can’t both be right.

  18. cranky-d says:

    I don’t think Cain has been eliminated yet, but prophecies can become self-fulfilling quite easily.

  19. happyfeet says:

    yes Bachmann is a freak and Perry can’t debate his way out of a wet paper bag but I might have to vote for Romney cause God help me I want to retire someday or at least be able to labour under the happy delusion that I might be able to retire someday so we have to get bumblefuckstick out of the white house – even if the price is perverting the Team R brand by turning it into the faggy faggy Wall Street Romney party

    and you know what honestly Team R branding is really not my problem and it hasn’t been since they nominated Meghan’s coward daddy and you saw this morning where the forty Rs wrote a letter begging begging begging the super committee to raise taxes

    the Team R brand and a handful of shit is unsanitary, is what it adds up to

    go wash your hands

  20. DarthLevin says:

    I think our political process would be vastly improved if all campaign activity had to take place in written form *only*. No video, no audio, text only. Maybe graphs, but no photos.

    Reduce the kneejerk, emotional, bullshit to a minimum and maybe some actual rational thought and intelligent discourse would result.

  21. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Hard to kneejerk when you’re listening to the radio Darth —it takes too much effort to pay attention.

  22. Spiny Norman says:

    I don’t think Cain has been eliminated yet, but prophecies can become self-fulfilling quite easily.

    The MBM and the Establicans have their hooks in him. It doesn’t matter if none of their claims are true, or even gross exaggerations, they will get their prize.

  23. McGehee says:

    Both major parties are parasites. The difference is one of them knew it needed to preserve the life of the host.

    It knew. I don’t think it still does.

  24. Abe Froman says:

    I doubt that Abe is looking for glib, as opposed to more forthcomingly substantive, but I’m just guessing as to Abe’s view. For my part, I like Gov Perry well enough to vote for him, but to close the deal it’s up to him to articulate his grasp of our mutually agreeable principles in depth — he doesn’t help himself by assuming I will guess what he understands.

    You’re right, of course. But mainly what I was getting at is that Jeff can be a little overwrought in what he attributes solely to the forces of malevolence.

  25. serr8d says:

    I’ve never been a ‘pure’ GOP’er. They’ve been an unpleasant albatross to wear since Bush 41, BobDole and even with Bush 43. After that McGinnis anal pore took out Sarah Palin, chances that we’ll win this cycle have speedily circled the drain AFAIC.

    McRomney winning? Does that really matter, at this junct-ure?

  26. DarthLevin says:

    Hard to kneejerk when you’re listening to the radio Darth —it takes too much effort to pay attention.

    Tell that to Orson Welles on Halloween, Ernst.

  27. cranky-d says:

    If we give up on a candidate just because the MBM wants it that way, we’ll have no one else to blame but ourselves.

  28. sdferr says:

    I cheated away from the implication (in which I agree with you) in order to focus on the glib charge. Gov. Perry seems hearted aright to me, but too willing to dip into a bag of conservative cliche, rather than engage his brain in generative expression of his views.

  29. Ernst Schreiber says:

    I think that rather proves my point Darth, if you made the effort to pay attention, you would have known exactly what it was you were listening to —disclaimers and all.

  30. DarthLevin says:

    Unfortunately, Ernst, we’ve seen fit to grant the franchise to people who willingly (even wilfully) avoid paying attention to anything other than soundbites, web blurbs, tweets, and something Jon Stewart says between Jersey Shore promos. Maybe if we made it boring and involved to get information about candidates we could avoid mistakes like Jug-Eared Jesus.

    Sorry, I’m curmudgeonly lately. Can someone please come stand on my lawn so I can yell at them to git off’n it?

  31. deadrody says:

    Come on. Lets at least be honest here. I hate the GOP establishment as much as the next guy, but don’t paper over candidates true problems and highlight the ones you want.

    Michelle Bachman flamed out after claiming a vaccine can and did cause mental retardation

    Rick Perry flamed out after claiming the only way you could oppose in-state tuition for illegal immigrants is to be “heartless”.

    Neither of those things are reasons the “GOP establishment” opposes candidates. Those are reason ALL rational people oppose candidates. And immigration is specifically a Tea Party issue that Rick Perry fails miserably on.

  32. Ernst Schreiber says:

    You think you’re curmudgeonly? I’m turning into hybrid quasi-monarchical counter-Enlightenment liberal of the extreme right and I’m not even Catholic! So imagine how grouchy I am these days.

  33. Abe Froman says:

    German people with fancy book learning scare me.

  34. Jeff G. says:

    Sure, deadrody.

    The Newsweek cover of Bachmann? Never happened. And Rove has never ever ever gone after Perry — just as the rock story didn’t happen.

    Listen: all the reasons you (and abe before you) mentioned for the way certain candidates have fallen are true; in fact, I was very critical of Perry’s debate performance and his “heartless” comment. But it’s the ancillary stuff that tends to push people one way or another in a field where they consider a number of the candidates pretty much interchangeable. Which is why the ancillary stuff gets so much play.

    Every candidate has weaknesses. But it’s the caricaturing of them that is broadly used to dissuade people from supporting them. That’s what the whole “electability” argument is about.

  35. SicSemperTyrannus says:

    My problem with Cain has nothing to do with salacious media BS. But a couple days ago he gave an interview where he gave the impression he didn’t know that China had nukes. You don’t have to be a foreign policy wonk to know that, you just had to have been paying attention to current events. China has had nuclear weapons since 1964 fer cryin’ out loud.

    And I still don’t have a clue what his 9-9-9 plan is – other than it’s 6-6-6 upside down.

    I like his feistiness and candor, but his apparent ignorance of the world beyond business is appalling.

  36. sdferr says:

    . . . he gave the impression he didn’t know that China had nukes.

    I’d say you took the impression. I understood him to be aiming at China’s ongoing nuclear weapons development. As to his tax thinking, he’s been at it a long time, so you’ve got some catching up to do.

  37. Jeff G. says:

    The China-Nukes story has already been debunked.

    Cain actually thinks people are asking him to discuss policy positions. When what they are doing is checking his polish — these people who demanded no more business as usual in DC.

  38. sdferr says:

    APRIL 17, 1996
    I’m delighted to have with us this morning three distinguished members of the Commission, including a past alumnus of this Committee, the Honorable Jack Kemp, as well as Jack Paris of NFIB, and former IRS Commissioner, Shirley Peterson. Thank you all for being here today.

    We had expected to have with us Kemp Commissioner Herman Cain, who regrettably had a last minute emergency and will not be here this morning.

  39. happyfeet says:

    With the demise of Thursday’s measure, an announcement could come as early as Friday on what’s the next piece of Obama’s jobs agenda to break out for a stand-alone vote. Democratic aides say the next measure would be legislation to provide a $4,800 tax credit for hiring an unemployed veteran and increasing the tax credit for hiring a veteran with a service-related disability to up to $9,600.

    Republicans back the idea of the veterans hiring tax credit.

    really? I think a “veterans hiring tax credit” is every bit as much a gay-assed abrogation of the free market as anything else what’s been done during president fuckhole’s reign.

    Does the Republican Party actually have any for reals principles? Yeah I know about the fetus thing already.

  40. SDN says:

    Come to think of it, Romney might achieve the same end if he’s as bad as I rather expect.

    Except for one vital factor that CANNOT be emphasized enough: he gives the LSM, and the Copperheads, the ability to stagger out of the wreckage and scream “BI-PARTISAN!!!eleventy! Republican policies!!!! BUUUSSSHHHHROMNEY!!!!!”

    And is it really worth that to go off the cliff at 80 instead of 120? Hell, no.

    If Clorox Obama is the nominee, I’ll vote straight Dem. Because obviously Americans haven’t “gotten it good and hard” enough, and a gentleman makes sure his partner gets all the satisfaction desired.

  41. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Clorox Obama, I like that.

  42. SDN says:

    Well, happy, all I know is that Rick Perry told a bunch of Iowa politicos led by a former governor to take their ethanol subsidies and shove them up their asses.

    1st link:

    Perry’s assault is consistent with his energy policy, which calls for the termination of all subsidies for energy, both alternative and fossil fuels.

    2nd link:

    “[W]hether you’re in the oil and gas business, the tax credits they get, whether you’re in the ethanol business and the renewable fuel standard or whether you’re in the wind side, from Washington DC, I do not think it is the federal government’s business to be picking winners and losers in frankly any of our energy sources,” Perry said to a forum on manufacturing jobs in Pella, Iowa.

    “They ought to get back to what they ought to have been doing which is standing a good military and securing the border and then let the states work out most of the rest of these things,” Perry said.

    Sounds plenty staunch to me.

  43. happyfeet says:

    Clorox is based in Oakland

  44. happyfeet says:

    I think Perry is plenty staunch Mr. SDN and I’d vote for him in a heartbeat… but he doesn’t seem to understand the moment and he certainly doesn’t seem to know what place he wants to have in it

    plus he lacks basic skills

Comments are closed.