Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Archives

Cain campaign's "smoking man" Mark Block calls on Perry campaign, Politico to apologize to Herman Cain

Perry supporters, you may commence stroking out.

Richard Miniter supplies the background.

167 Replies to “Cain campaign's "smoking man" Mark Block calls on Perry campaign, Politico to apologize to Herman Cain”

  1. serr8d says:

    Perry picked the wrong rock this time.

  2. sdferr says:

    Has the pie started flying yet? I love pie.

  3. happyfeet says:

    Washington attorney Joel P. Bennett, who represents one of the two women who claim that Cain mistreated her, doesn’t have a copy of agreements the women signed with the National Restaurant Association. “I haven’t seen a copy of this in 12 years,” he told me, adding that he hopes to get a copy from the National Restaurant Association. His client asked him to stop giving interviews. In the past 24 hours, he said, he had appeared on NBC, CBS, NYT and NPR.

    shameless little whore this Joel Bennett

  4. serr8d says:

    Levin has been ripping assholes clean out of these lame lawyers and the Politico staff as well. Love it when he gets on a roll.

    #OccupyPolitico

  5. newrouter says:

    ot jeff

    “that twitter thing” gives a 404 error when click on “view more tweets”

  6. BBHunter says:

    – feets, why would you cast such an insult at the world’s oldest profession?

    – A third person (from Gold diggers of America) has surfaced to accuse Cain.

    – I’m thinking Duke reduex. These money grubbers never learn.

  7. John Bradley says:

    “Now I ain’t saying she’s a gold digger / But she ain’t playin’ with no broke… person of color.”

  8. sdferr says:

    By the by, does anybody mind if Israel decides to nuke Iran’s nuclear weapons development programs? I’m all like, sic ’em, Bibi, if that’s what you gotta do. But then, I like pie too.

  9. happyfeet says:

    it’s been how many hours since this broke and still there’s no for reals allegations just politico faggotry and this sad little Bennett doggy getting his leash yanked

  10. happyfeet says:

    nuking Iran gets you not one but TWO tasty no sugar added klondike bars

  11. newrouter says:

    72 hours @ 8 pm est

  12. bh says:

    “Now I ain’t saying she’s a gold digger / But she ain’t playin’ with no broke… person of color.”

    Probably the first use of Kanye West lyrics at pw, JB. That should earn you a special badge.

  13. sdferr says:

    Any translation of that code newrouter?

  14. bh says:

    #11 for #9, sdferr.

  15. happyfeet says:

    that’s how many hours since story broke i think

  16. sdferr says:

    Ah, thanks. My confusion is a result of tv programs being named things like “72 hours”, so I wasn’t sure what the antecedent was.

  17. newrouter says:

    @11 for @9

  18. BBHunter says:

    – They’ve arrested 60 members of a large Mexican drug cartel operating out of Phoenix. Among the items discovered in their homes – AK-47’s and hi power assault rifles with serial numbers traceable back to fast and furious. So you have the O’fuck administration suing Arizona for enforcing Federal immigration laws, and the DoJ supplying guns to the cartel that imports drugs to school kids in the states.

    – Could it get much worse?

  19. Pablo says:

    You’d think that this was the only thing happening in America today, based on the coverage. The “Herman Cain is an angry black man” stuff is particularly notable. Did you see how viciously he said “Excuse me.”? I’m getting the vapors just thinking about it.

  20. LBascom says:

    Oh noes. Apologies. Why does it always gotta be apologies?

  21. sdferr says:

    But he’s a race-carder Pablo! How dare he let his skin pass through his mind?

  22. Jeff G. says:

    He’s like Mandingo.

  23. newrouter says:

    front runner 2nd tier candidate responds

    I asked Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s communications director Ray Sullivan what facts he had on which to base his allegation that the Romney camp was the source of the Politico stories about Herman Cain’s sexual harassment cases.

    Sullivan emailed: “I’m simply citing the ties between Romney camp and [the National Restaurant Association] based on the facts.”

    The “facts” are actually one fact, that a Romney donor succeeded Cain at the NRA.

    Link

  24. BBHunter says:

    I’ve checked HuffPutz every day since the F&F thing broke and I’ve yet to see a single mention.

    – Cain has named the guy he thinks started the whole mess, but the guy denied having anything to do with it. Aside from the veracity of this I’d wonder if this is a way for Cain’s camp to smoke out the perps.

  25. newrouter says:

    drudge has “friendly fire?/hand of rahm?”

  26. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Not only did Anderson deny having anything to do with the Politico story, he’s saying, contra Cain, that he never heard about the alleged harrassment prior to reading about it in Politico, which is itself feerry interresstink.

  27. BBHunter says:

    – If I had to guess I would say this is an honest confusion on Cain’s part. He well may have been vetted by someone and had that exact conversation, but he tried to recall the “who” and had to guess from among several possibles, and is simply mistaken.

    – All that aside, his campaign needs to get on top of this by not making impulsive mistakes more than anything else, because the press will grab at the slightest straw.

  28. cranky-d says:

    I think this was a bad move for Cain. However, it’s the kind of move one would expect from a political novice.

    I hope he makes this into a learning experience, and learns a better way to address these kinds of attacks, because if he stays in the race, it will only get worse.

  29. bh says:

    Not only did Anderson deny having anything to do with the Politico story, he’s saying, contra Cain, that he never heard about the alleged harrassment prior to reading about it in Politico, which is itself feerry interresstink.

    Yeah, I noticed that, too.

  30. bh says:

    My (stripping of) emphasis. Unintentional.

  31. newrouter says:

    “it’s the kind of move one would expect from a political novice.”

    what does the “pro” do?

  32. Ernst Schreiber says:

    If I had to guess, I’d say that Curt Anderson of OnMessage Inc. just pulled a Bart Simpson.

  33. steph says:

    If Cain could get Gloria Allred on his side for this, she’d out-whore all of the other whores, leaving the likes of Bob Seiffert whore-tied. I think that’s how this Colombia J-school stuff works anyway. Once whored, you must up the whore-ante, and Gloria is like the Phil Ivey of the whore-trumpers. Unless Gerry Spence is available.

  34. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Just means your akshent isn’t as dick as mein, bh.

  35. dicentra says:

    For all of y’all who follow me on Twitter (@dicentra63), I just tried to put some knowledge to the Tribbles but apparently failed.

    *sigh*

  36. Ernst Schreiber says:

    According to Jen Rubin, it is all Herman Cain’s fault.

    There Steph. You’re wrong. You can’t out-whore a slut.

  37. bh says:

    On the plus side, I was finally able to figure out #hhrs through that context, Di.

    I was meaning to thank you for that.

  38. Jeff G. says:

    Rubin was a McCain supporter in 2008 and is a Romney supporter now. Like all the GOP establishment, she wants the least conservative candidate and a maintenance of the status quo.

    And she isn’t alone. How many people who you’ve read for the last 3 years or so are talking electability and experience and polish, etc. — after having pretended to be Tea Party-types when that was a big seller?

    We conservatives always lose because we either listen to liberals or work to please them. And it’s getting worse, now that a whole new generation of new media types vie for actual jobs inside DC politics and its attendant industries.

  39. cranky-d says:

    I agree that the story is that Politico is composed of political hacks, and the fact that all one needs to do is “bring up the question” for the sharks to start circling is another mark against the MBM.

  40. Ernst Schreiber says:

    We conservatives always lose because we either listen to liberals or work to please them. And it’s getting worse, now that a whole new generation of new media types vie for actual jobs inside DC politics and its attendant industries.

    If only Tim Pawlenty were still in the race. He’d save us for sure!

  41. Jeff G. says:

    From a commeter at Human Events:

    After a 30+ year career as a business executive, I can assure you that most claims of sexual harassment, racial discrimination, age discrimination, etc., are baseless and usually leveled by someone who is a poor performer and is angry at the boss because they are being expected to work harder and they don’t like it. How do I know this? Try having charges leveled at YOU for 25 years. Try having to go through the investigations for these types of allegations. I have been charged with racial and/or age discrimination about six times in my career, ALWAYS by a poor performing employee who just wants the boss to back off and allow them to slack off. Every time I was subjected to an investigation that lasted anywhere from three to six months and was extremely unpleasant. Four times, after I subsequently fired the employees for poor performance, I was subjected to a witch hunt lawsuit, and had to endure the depositions, investigations, scrutiny, etc. Each time, because of the immense expense of the legal costs involved, my employer elected to settle the lawsuits, even though I had already been found NOT GUILTY in a prior investigation. I was never informed of the terms of those settlements. I was, however, told I could not discuss them. EVER. So I can understand how Herman Cain, confronted with questions from reporters about an anonymous charge of sexual harassment, with no details, might not respond in a smooth way. He might not have known exactly what they were talking about. He probably does NOT know the terms of any settlement. And he probably DOES know that these women are NEVER supposed to talk about this. I hope that if anyone does come forward and discusses her alleged “harassment” that she is also then required to repay the settlement money.

  42. Jeff G. says:

    He “confided.” We must punish his impure thoughts.

    Agreeing to do so shows us to be more moral men than he.

  43. steph says:

    #37
    Damn her eyes! Jen was carrying a slut in the hole all the time, and I was out-slutted, out-whored, and out-done. Damn but these rupub-slut zombies are trained very well in their ruling-class slut-whoriness.
    But I – I am Lord of the Hyphen – watch me dance!

  44. BBHunter says:

    – I was going to ask about losing your hyphen a long time ago, but I might be slapped with sexual harassment.

  45. steph says:

    You don’t have to be an executive to get caught up in this discrimination bs. My wife and I both have had charges against us for discrimination of one sort or the other in the workplace. In today’s world, if you don’t stand accused of some bs discrimination claim, you aren’t a manager, you’re just some employee’s friend. I could tell such stories! (except, after 15+ years, the cases still haven’t been dismissed. Ah, but it’s all billable time, isn’t it).

  46. Pablo says:

    Sometimes, you have to give Ace credit:

    Correction on my dumb belief the “positive development” he spoke about was the attack on Perry. (Looking back, that doesn’t even make sense. What a dummy I am.)

    What you don’t have to do is take him seriously.

  47. steph says:

    #45
    Well and truely played.

  48. cranky-d says:

    I don’t want to get Perry by default because Cain was forced out by a biased media and their helpers. I want a fair hearing in public, and finally a vote. If Perry wins, I can support him in the general election.

    I know, I’m delusional.

  49. Jeff G. says:

    They should have just titled this story, “hey, our bullshit really DOES work!”

  50. happyfeet says:

    I could support Perry in the general but boy-o ain’t no Bush I tell you that right now

    he’s just better than Romney is all

  51. happyfeet says:

    i don’t agree with Mr. Jimmie’s conclusions but I like how he puts this part even if I think it’s overstated

    What really bothers me, and why after nearly a year of constant and eager support I can’t back Herman Cain’s campaign any longer, is that Brand Management is supposed to be Cain’s strength. That is how he helped build Pillsbury and how he turned Godfather’s Pizza around. I was willing to ignore Cain’s lack of political expertise because, when you get down to it, politics is nothing more than building and managing a personal brand. Cain should have excelled that that, but he hasn’t. I’m baffled by his inability to deliver an uncluttered message when his entire career has revolved around successfully doing that very thing. From his confusing and incomplete defense of the 9-9-9 plan to his continued misstatements on abortion and foreign policy, he has punched hole after hole in his own brand to the point where I don’t see any way it can remain afloat.

  52. sdferr says:

    politics is nothing more than building and managing a personal brand

    That’s fucking retarded.

  53. newrouter says:

    “I was willing to ignore Cain’s lack of political expertise because, when you get down to it, politics is nothing more than building and managing a personal brand.”

    really? john edwards could not be reached for comment.

  54. BBHunter says:

    – I’m afraid you just don’t understand what REALLY constitutes “yellow journalism” Jeff. To wit:

    “In Wednesday’s Yeas & Nays, we wrote an item speculating about whether House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi might have had some work done. An area plastic surgeon chimed in, saying that, in his opinion, it appeared as if that might be likely. We reached out to the Pelosi camp asking for comment, and while we didn’t hear back from them by deadline, press secretary Drew Hammill did respond Tuesday evening with some choice words — “You are a disgrace to journalism.” A bit sensitive perhaps? That doesn’t exactly sound like a denial either now, does it?”

    – See, that’s how its done. You have to focus on the important issues, especially if it concerns the front runner for “dumbest former speaker of the house ever”.

  55. newrouter says:

    “to his continued misstatements on abortion and foreign policy”

    what’s the mitttens/rickyperry/bachmann et al views on these topics?

  56. bh says:

    If Cain falters, I’d still have a problem supporting Perry if his campaign was behind the Politico smear job.

    But, I’m still thinking that secondary case is pretty weak. (And, guess what?, it’ll always be a weak case.)

    I’m just not super excited about the Cain campaign saying point blank that this is from a specific person from a specific campaign unless they know. Which they can’t. They simply can’t. Yeah, it sucks. But floating further conjecture isn’t cool. Which they should very well know from their own experience the last couple days.

  57. bh says:

    “politics is nothing more than building and managing a personal brand”

    That’s fucking retarded.

    Yeah, it is. It probably follows directly from his vulgar use of the term.

  58. Jeff G. says:

    I like Jimmy. But Jesus, people. If you don’t understand the untenable position Cain was put in because you haven’t bothered talking it through with HR types or lawyers familiar with employment law, your pontificating just sounds dumb — and trust me, the people who worked this are drawing conclusions a lot different from yours. Like, for instance, that it’s so very easy to play the lot of you, because you care more than anything about appearing sensible.

    Only, you let the wrong people define what that is.

    To Jimmie’s credit, he has multiple reasons for dismissing Cain. And my own emotional failings lead me to take up for those I believe are being bullied and piled onto, often to the point where I underappreciate their weaknesses.

    Still, I’ll be damned if I’m going to let a leftwing hit job take down another conservative without fighting back.

  59. Jeff G. says:

    Beyond that, let me just say that I need to get offline. I’m really starting to snipe, and that never ends well for me — good though it feels at the moment I let ‘er fly.

  60. newrouter says:

    Hot Air has learned that the Cain campaign will launch a moneybomb starting at midnight tonight. According to a source close to the Herman Cain campaign, this has been in the works a while, planned for early in November to take advantage of their polling boost from late September and October. The sudden support they got as conservatives rallied around Cain in the first couple of days after the Politico story may have almost made it unnecessary, but given the events of the last 24 hours or so, the timing’s probably as good as possible to start a seven-day fund drive specific to growing their organization in Iowa. The target? $999,000, of course:

    Link

  61. Jeff G. says:

    Dropped about 8 followers in the last five minutes on Twitter.

    Probably had to do with this: “I’m pretty sure Cain did something nasty. Them black mens is very hypersexualized. And hung. But boy, can they sing! #itsnotasmearifitstrue”

    It was in response to a gabrielmalor post that said, “It’s not a “smear” if it’s true.” Several people evidently didn’t get the reference.

  62. McGehee says:

    I could support Perry in the general but boy-o ain’t no Bush I tell you that right now

    Ironically, my view of Dubya in mid-1999 was about the same as my view of Perry right now: not any kind of preferred choice, but I could vote for him if I had to.

    That was before I started keeping a never-gonna-vote-for list, but I don’t think Bush would have been on it if I’d been as pissed off then as I am now.

    Liddy Dole, on the other hand…

  63. McGehee says:

    Gabriel Malor is a smear. Somebody desperately needs to use more bleach washing their undershorts.

  64. Jeff G. says:

    Too late. Just called gabriel malor a douche, in so many words.

  65. newrouter says:

    “I like Jimmy.”

    well he be crowing the same tune as: ace, jenrube, neocommentary, nko online and the other “conservatives”. the pansy stupid party.

  66. sdferr says:

    I just meant that politics is about whether people allow slavery to enter Nebraska, or end the Missouri Compromise, or have slavery at all, or have a war over that, or tax the people in the equivalent of 25% of GDP and waste a fifth of that by pouring it down a rat-hole. Politics is about doing what’s best, either, as the man said “in preservation or change”, and about the fight over what the meaning of that best is. Branding, in that context, is poppycock.

  67. Joe says:

    Jen Rubin is either stupid or a liar. I do not think she is stupid.

    Hannity had Stuart Varney and Juan Williams on yesterday and Sean played Williams a clip of voices on the left tearing the shit out of Herman Cain. When you hear them in an stream for about 30 second or so, it is shocking. Williams said it was disgraceful how the left does that to a black man who had the termerity to take a conservative opinion.

    Yet Jen Rubin blames Herman Cain? Rubin is no conservative and is not even on our side.

  68. Jeff G. says:

    I think I’ll go out in a blaze of glory. Next month would have marked 10 years. That’s a long time doing this only to find yourself increasingly voiceless. Fuck it. Lets shoot some fuckers down.

  69. newrouter says:

    you’ll never make it with the cucumber set.

  70. happyfeet says:

    Perry might could grow on me I guess … I still think the optional flat tax thing is kinda loopy

    Mr. Jeff people are stupid bless their hearts and you don;t want stupid people following you it’s not good for you it’s not good for them and it annoys the pig

  71. happyfeet says:

    oh goody the damn semicolons are back just in time for the time change

  72. happyfeet says:

    Mr. sdferr I’m inclined to think that “running for president is nothing more than building and managing a personal brand” is closer to what Mr. Jimmie was saying

  73. sdferr says:

    Maybe so hf, or probably so, but goddamn it, look at what it got us.

  74. Jeff G. says:

    Here’s what Mr Malor had to say, a post RT by Jen Rubin: “Everything about this story was in Cain’s power to control. And instead, he did everything you do when you are guilty.”

    Think about that. Cain’s acting guilty because he doesn’t have a lot of experience defending his public reputation against charges of sexual misconduct made years ago by two unnamed women, the particulars of which complaints he may not even know (given how HR cases work), and without complete knowledge of settlement details that he likely never even saw.

    In one case, Cain was alleged to have made non-overtly sexual gestures.

    GUILTY!

    Both Malor and Rubin are lawyers. And have found wide readerships.

    We’re doomed.

  75. happyfeet says:

    yup that’s why I liked how he put it I think – cause in that light it’s scary true – especially in the land of “the two political parties are breaking down” … and also I think it’s interesting to look at Wall Street Romney through that lens

  76. BBHunter says:

    – If you put lipstick on a Progressive, you still have a skank.

  77. happyfeet says:

    if you tweeter while you peeter be a sweetie wipe the seatie

  78. sdferr says:

    People are stupid, we mean, some large fraction of people are stupid but not everybody is stupid all the time though even the people who aren’t most of the time stupid (like Mr Bise, maybe) can be stupid some of the time too.

    But, for the most part, people don’t have to be stupid. They can learn. And politics, I think, is one of those things people can learn about, so not to be so goddamn stupid about it all the goddamn time. It’s fixable.

  79. newrouter says:

    “running for president is nothing more than building and managing a personal brand”

    Labor Day Speech at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, New Jersey

    September 1, 1980

    It is fitting that on Labor Day, we meet beside the waters of New York harbor, with the eyes of Miss Liberty on our gathering and in the words of the poet whose lines are inscribed at her feet, “The air bridged harbor that twin cities frame.”

    Through this “Golden Door,” under the gaze of that “Mother of Exiles,” have come millions of men and women, who first stepped foot on American soil right there, on Ellis Island, so close to the Statue of Liberty.

    These families came here to work. They came to build. Others came to America in different ways, from other lands, under different, often harrowing conditions, but this place symbolizes what they all managed to build, no matter where they came from or how they came or how much they suffered.

    They helped to build that magnificent city across the river. They spread across the land building other cities and towns and incredibly productive farms.

    They came to make America work. They didn’t ask what this country could do for them but what they could do to make this refuge the greatest home of freedom in history.

    They brought with them courage, ambition and the values of family, neighborhood, work, peace and freedom. They came from different lands but they shared the same values, the same dream.

    Today a President of the United States would have us believe that dream is over or at least in need of change.

    Jimmy Carter’s Administration tells us that the descendants of those who sacrificed to start again in this land of freedom may have to abandon the dream that drew their ancestors to a new life in a new land.

    The Carter record is a litany of despair, of broken promises, of sacred trusts abandoned and forgotten.

    Eight million out of work. Inflation running at 18 percent in the first quarter of 1980. Black unemployment at about 14 percent, higher than any single year since the government began keeping separate statistics. Four straight major deficits run up by Carter and his friends in Congress. The highest interest rates since the Civil War–reaching at times close to 20 percent–lately down to more than 11 percent but now going up again–productivity falling for six straight quarters among the most productive people in history.

    Through his inflation he has raised taxes on the American people by 30 percent–while their real income has risen only 20 percent. He promised he would not increase taxes for the low and middle-income people–the workers of America. Then he imposed on American families the largest single tax increase in history.

    His answer to all of this misery? He tries to tell us that we are “only” in a recession, not a depression, as if definitions—words–relieve our suffering.

    Let it show on the record that when the American people cried out for economic help, Jimmy Carter took refuge behind a dictionary. Well if it’s a definition he wants, I’ll give him one. A recession is when your neighbor loses his job. A depression is when you lose yours. Recovery is when Jimmy Carter loses his.

    Link

  80. BBHunter says:

    – Bummblefuck never held a real job.

    – ….and he still hasn’t.

  81. SDN says:

    All I’m going to say is what I said yesterday: When Rick Perry goes to Iowa and tells a former Iowa governor to his face in front of an audience “No, the federal government shouldn’t be paying your stupid ethanol subsidies, pay for them as a state if you think its’ such a good deal!” he’s got my vote.

    I don’t give a rat’s ass who he or his campaign supposedly talk to.

    I also find it interesting that we have a major ORomney donor in a position to know all the details of the cases as president of the National Restaurant Association and yet Cain goes after Perry…. the only guy he claims he wouldn’t take the Veep job from.

  82. Stephanie says:

    great hash tag #HermanCainAllegations

    Occupied Wall Street without her consent.

    Forgot to wash hands before returning to work.

  83. newrouter says:

    “the only guy he claims he wouldn’t take the Veep job from.”

    yea because mr. ricky perry goes from front runner to backstreet boy in 3 weeks. i wouldn’t take a taco from the bumbling clown. you perry clowns have a lot to answer for.

  84. BBHunter says:

    – I recall that the night of Reagans election people were so relieved they were moved to tears. Things at that time, as bad as they were, were not even close to the disaster we have on our hands right now.

    – If we splinter our vote, if someone, Cain or whomever, doesn’t come forward, someone who can win broad support. we’ll face another 4 years of this and I just don’t see it all surviving without upheaval.

    – The young simply do not understand the razor blade surprise waiting at the end of the pleasure island water slide.

  85. dicentra says:

    On the plus side, I was finally able to figure out #hhrs through that context, Di.

    I was meaning to thank you for that.

    Well, I WAS hoping to accomplish One Good Thing today, but I certainly wasn’t counting on THAT.

    I don’t know what to say…

  86. Ernst Schreiber says:

    “Everything about this story was in Cain’s power to control. And instead, he did everything you do when you are guilty.”

    What specifically was it that was in Cain’s power to control?

    I’m not sold on 9-9-9, but it’s fairly obvious that Cain threatens rice bowls on both sides of the aisle. And we just can’t have that, can we?

  87. newrouter says:

    oh my erick the idiot servicing ricky

    The Rick Perry Statement on Herman Cain

    you go metrosexual!

  88. Jeff G. says:

    Just spent an hour in the most excruciating conversation ever. Let me just say this: those most aggressively going after Cain? Have no idea how any of this works, either legally or from a business or insurance standpoint.

    But that won’t stop them from pretending they’re experts. He SETTLED. Therefore he’s GUILTY OF RAPE or some such!

  89. BBHunter says:

    – The talking heads can flap their lips endlessly, and they will. It all comes down to how well Cain can handle his attackers and survive. If he’s up to the task, he will survive, possibly even thrive.

  90. Stephanie says:

    I was following that Jeff. Totally clueless. I got more real info in the #HermanCainAllegations hashtag game than from her. Is she related to McJugs, by chance?

  91. newrouter says:

    “He SETTLED. Therefore he’s GUILTY OF RAPE or some such!”

    the ezra klein/andrew sullivan/matt egalus folks are giddy. mo baracky they say.

  92. newrouter says:

    the hermanator took it to baracky on his ads on limbaugh. i can see rahm involved.

  93. Stephanie says:

    Speaking of twitter. Saw some info that Oakland Owsies went nuts at Whole Foods!?! and there is a death resulting. On the bright side, they are following Krugman’s rules for stimulus and job creation. Lots of broken windows.

  94. BBHunter says:

    “He SETTLED. Therefore he’s GUILTY OF RAPE or some such!”

    – I’d ask them if they’d be as ready to admit a unbased rush to judgement if it turns out their really was no finding of guilt?

    – Because as of now there is not a single instance of a proven allegation. None.

  95. Ernst Schreiber says:

    The Rick Perry Statement on Herman Cain:

    “Our campaign had absolutely nothing to do with it. You know I I’m disappointed that uh ah there’s finger pointing going on uh and the sooner we get back to talking about the issues that are important to the people of this country the better, and that’s how we get Americans working again.”

    “There’s not anybody in my campaign uh that knew anything about this uh that’s associated with my campaign uh in any form or fashion. I mean, it it, end of story, I mean this is it’s one of those that’s uh about as clear cut a-as I I ca-an tell ya. We found out about the allegations against Mr. Cain same time everybody else did.”

    “Everything about this story was in [his] power to control. And instead, he did everything you do when you are guilty.”

    GUILTY! GUILTY! GUILTY!

  96. sdferr says:

    Although windows at two bank branches and a Whole Foods store were broken and graffiti was painted inside one of the banks, officials described the protests as peaceful and orderly and said no arrests had been made.

    Didn’t see anything about anyone dying.

  97. Jeff G. says:

    She’s the head of the TeaParty org putting on BlogCon. And the dude is just a total fucking moron.

  98. Jeff G. says:

    I’m serious. I’m done. I dislike many on the right as much as the left, maybe more so, because they pretend they are on our side until it’s time to throw somebody under the bus. At least w/ the left you know where you stand.

  99. newrouter says:

    burn those bridges. it might be stimulus. #OccupyBigBridge

  100. BBHunter says:

    – Oakland is a classic case of the snake eating its tail. The fanatically Leftist Mayor is boxed in. The city is paying it’s workers to strike and stay away from their jobs, the only jobs they have. Is that fucked up or what?

    – The Police chief said in a letter to the city council that if the protesters threaten property or public safety they will be arrested, regardless of what the mayor says.

    – I’m waiting for the first involvement of the National guard somewhere in all this.

  101. Stephanie says:

    It’s all over the twitter. Lots of people bashing Boehlert and pinning the death on him. But I just saw another tweet that the ‘victim’ isn’t dead and was taken by ambulance… so who knows. Lots of tweets about lots of violence at both Oakland and Portland (?). I was mostly following the Jeff/Pink Elephant thing and wasn’t really following the links much.

    Ain’t none of it gonna end well.

  102. newrouter says:

    “She’s the head of the TeaParty org putting on BlogCon”

    blogcon is like The Sting

  103. newrouter says:

    “Lots of tweets about lots of violence at both Oakland”

    ax sanfrannan about dat. do it jim jones.

  104. Stephanie says:

    She’s an idiot with a substandard education. It takes some time. They aren’t used to actual reasoning. It hurts their brains. Plus facts and shit that aren’t credentialed are suspect. Plus your lack of moral authority.

    Snark n Boobs is the one I’m disappointed in. She normally doesn’t succumb.

    Hopefully, this will all die out by the weekend. I don’t see Herman doing a W/D.

  105. Jeff G. says:

    I’m going libertarian. I need the pot.

    Plus, no Jen Rubin or any of these other phony “conservatives” acting as my “voice.”

  106. Ernst Schreiber says:

    If W/D stands for withdraw, I don’t see Cain dropping out either. Thus it won’t die out. He’s branded for the duration.

  107. Ernst Schreiber says:

    I see you and Gillespie getting along infamously.

    What about that crazy tall chick who writes for the Atlantic these days? McArdle? Isn’t she a libertarian too?

  108. Stephanie says:

    Cain’s secretary has spoken out on the charges… she firmly denies the women had basis for claims.

    New polls coming out and there is a Cain surge. Polling from after the Politico piece broke.

    Plus there is a money bomb today for Cain. Herman says give til the line is up to here (puts hand just below chin).

    Don’t despair.

  109. Jeff G. says:

    It took me two weeks on Twitter to be despised by all the opinion-shapers on the right. Got to be a record.

  110. BBHunter says:

    2 #occupyoakland protesters injured after being struck by car at 11th & Broadway. Driver reportedly frustrated by protesters in the street.

    Sources on the scene say non-life threatening.

  111. geoffb says:

    Seeing the “First they came for the …..” play out in real time isn’t pretty, so saying so won’t get me charged with “inappropriateness”.

    Progressive lesson for today, always drop slurs not complements, chicks dig being trashed and thrashed.

  112. geoffb says:

    @#112,

    When you’re good you’re very very good but when your badass you’re better.

  113. Stephanie says:

    Ha! I was active early now not so much. I generally go read my stream just to get a feel for what’s trending now – very little posting and an occasional retweet. Who has large enough time and little enough self esteem to do a #FF.

    Most of em I see as energetic little buggers who have inflated senses of self (Smart Girl Radio – seriously?) and very little influence. Just Tut Tut em and smack em on the ass with an Atta Girl! They’ll cream they panties with delight. That includes several of the guys, too, btw.

  114. Ernst Schreiber says:

    always drop slurs not complements, chicks dig being trashed and thrashed.

    I understand there are whole websites devoted to just that topic.

  115. geoffb says:

    Iowa Cain Accuser Appears To Have Anti-Cain Agenda”

    He brings up a bunch of dumb shit like the China-Nukes thing that even Ace admits is not what Cain said/knew/knows.

  116. Stephanie says:

    Among these South Carolina voters, 75% were able to correctly identify Cain as the candidate who was accused of sexual harassment in the 1990s. Only nine percent (9%) mistakenly thought it was some other candidate, while 16% are not sure.

    Just nine percent (9%) think it’s Very Likely that the charges against Cain are serious and true. Another 19% think it’s Somewhat Likely. Fifty-eight percent (58%) consider it unlikely, but that includes only 19% who say that it is Not at All Likely. This suggests that Republican voters are generally willing to give the candidate the benefit of the doubt while recognizing that more information might change their perception.

    Fifty-one percent (51%) believe it’s at least somewhat likely that the allegations were leaked by one of the other Republican campaigns. Among those who support Cain, that figure rises to 61%.

    The survey was conducted on Tuesday night following two days of media coverage concerning allegations of sexual harassment against Cain.

    From Rasmussen.

  117. Stephanie says:

    Grrrr… missed this part on the C&P

    The first Rasmussen Reports poll of South Carolina’s Likely Republican Primary Voters shows Cain with 33% support, Romney at 23% and Gingrich at 15%. Texas Governor Rick Perry earns nine percent (9%) of the likely primary vote, Texas Congressman Ron Paul five percent (5%) and Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann two percent (2%). Former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum and former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman each pick up one percent (1%), as does “some other candidate.” Ten percent (10%) remain undecided.

  118. Stephanie says:

    If that Iowa Cain accuser is who I think he is, he has a hard on for the smoking man. Something about him playing dirty pool in a prior race or something. Seems he got his ox gored and is looking for payment.

  119. BBHunter says:

    – I rang that gong a little earlier steph.

    – Its even more telling in light of the two days+ of mud slinging.

  120. Ernst Schreiber says:

    It took me two weeks on Twitter to be despised by all the opinion-shapers on the right.

    Really? All of them? I find that hard to believe. Why, earlier today I was reading Jim Geraghty who thinks that the Right is too fragmented and spoiled by our just-in-time-delivery-on-demand-instant-gratification culture to coalesce around a single anti-Romney.* So surely there has to be some fragment of the Right you haven’t pissed off yet. (But don’t let me dissuade you from cock-slapping libertarians to your heart’s content –those bastards are asking for it.)

    (*We’ll ignore the absurdity of a guy positing the instant-gratification seeking of others as the cause of the race failing to have already winnowed itself down to the expected front-runner and challenger two months before the first vote is cast.)

  121. geoffb says:

    So he is willing to fuck the entire country with a second Obama term because someone gave him a wedgie years ago. Damn, and I thought I thought myself so important. I ain’t got nothing on this putz.

  122. Ernst Schreiber says:

    We’re talking about the guy who only employs ugly women so he won’t give in to his carnal impulse to work up a Number 6 on ’em, shaming himself in front of the missus and his fellow men, right?

  123. geoffb says:

    Yep.

  124. geoffb says:

    The guy who never goes anywhere without his wife two paces away.

  125. Ernst Schreiber says:

    It occurs to me, apropos of nothing, that if we were to keep women segregated, confined to their own living quarters, never allowed to be seen in public unless absolutely necessary —and then accompanied by a male relative, we wouldn’t have these unpleasantries. Maybe we could get them to wear portable tents too.

  126. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Four paces would be more respectful, wouldn’t it?

  127. Joe says:

    So Tabatha Hale thinks Cain guilty because there was a settlement? Really? Did she offer you a blog con scholarship like she did for Stacy McCain?

    You may have a point about the libertarians. They like to drink and they have good dope. What’s not to like about that?

  128. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Deace was a Huckabee guy in ’08. And Cain isn’t reliably anti-abortion enough for his taste, it would seem.

  129. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Has anybody broached the possibilty that what’s going on here is the result of a generational gap; that what Herman Cain thinks of as a bit of old-fashioneed gallantry is recieved by a woman inculcated in a politically corrrect miliuex as, at best, awkward and/or inappropriate, and at worst, sexual harrassment?

  130. geoffb says:

    Stacy seems down with that.

    Yet this incident might suggest that Cain — like the late Strom, like me, like many other old-fashioned men from the South — considers flirtatious flattery and jocular banter an innocent amusement.

    Coming from a time and place where every diner waitress called you “honey” or “sugar,” and where extravagant compliments were the routine currency of social life, I am probably more sympathetic to the cultural defense of such behavior than the average Iowan would be. The many people who know Herman and praise him as an amiable gentleman perhaps see his down-to-earth jocularity as charming, whereas others might see it differently.

  131. sdferr says:

    Sure enough one thing or another is important. Is it saving the country from falling over a socialist cliff or discovering every tiny bit of minutia in a dozen year old bogus charge of sexual harassment mixed up with all manner of imaginative lawyering? Hard to figure.

  132. Jeff G. says:

    Cain told Greta that he’d see a woman and if she’d changed her hair he might say, ” you’ve changed your hair, it’s very becoming.” He used “becoming.”

    So yes, it’s a generational thing and a Southern thing. And PC made it something one could file a complaint over and get paid. Maybe not in this case, but I wouldn’t doubt it.

    Still, he settled. So he’s guilty. (And trust me: don’t even TRY telling these people that it wasn’t “him” who settled, or that he’d very likely have never seen the settlement or even the complaint against him. They don’t want to hear how things ACTUALLY work when they can just pretend it works precisely as they think it must, if Cain is a dirty dirty pervo).

  133. Ernst Schreiber says:

    All I know is that you can’t square this:

    [T]he last thing we need is another do-no-harm Republican president playing the fiddle while the republic burns. We need someone that will take the fight to Obama in 2012, and then to the Left’s infrastructure once in the White House.

    written before the Ames strawpoll, with the decision to insert himself and his female staff into this story, and then do so in a half-assed manner.

  134. sdferr says:

    Just caught a bit of dialogue from Real Genius — She: “Can you hammer a 6″ spike into a board with your penis?” He: “Not right now.” She: “A girl’s got to have her standards.” That’s 1985.

  135. Stephanie says:

    I’ve been talking about the southern gentleman thing on several blogs.

    Posted at JOM:
    Folks of Cain’s background (older southern) routinely attempt to find something nice to say to most folks they meet. It has to do with putting the other person at ease.

    The funny thing is that sometimes it causes muted smiles as an older gentleman attempts to compliment an obviously butt-ugly woman (or a butt-ugly baby) and is obviously lying his ass off.

    The general rule of thumb is a nicety about her kids first “your baby is such a beautiful little thing, she has your eyes,” youthfulness second – “this is your daughter, I thought you were her sister!!!,” and if both of those stretch the truth too far, comment on the shade of her clothing complimenting her skin.

    I can totally imagine Cain trying his level best to find where the offense occurred in that.

    BTW, the story of the inviting her up to his hotel ‘room’ is deceptive. According to my brother, who goes to a lot of restaurant conventions around the US and was frequently in and around the NRA groups, Cain always got a suite NOT A ROOM and that it was frequently used for hospitality purposes and the open bar was open and in use til about 1 or so in the mornings. So it wouldn’t be strange for him to invite her up to his suite. There would probably have been other people already there.

    Misdirection seems to be driving this story.
    Put just enough facts and slippery misuse of words (room not suite, inappropriate but not sexual) out there to let people’s imaginations run wild.

    Which brought this reply:

    You’ve reminded me of a trip my great aunt made to visit us down in South Carolina. She was short and portly, and stodgy New England through and through. She’d traveled all over the rest of the world and managed to remain utterly parochial in her attitudes, when she made her very first trip south. I was driving her home from a some sort of mint julep affair, when she turned to me and said, “You know, I thought these southern men would all be shameless flatterers, but they really mean it!” I almost strangled myself, trying to keep a straight face.

    It really is cultural and totally brought into start relief thanks to the feminist movement. We GRITS don’t generally truck with the feminists for that very reason.

  136. Stephanie says:

    Damn I thought I snipped the whole exchange:
    Me:

    My grandfather positively glared at me once for the height my eyebrow reflexively went up when he was talking to an absolutely horrid looking old lady that was sitting in a chair painfully erect and in a corset with two bright pink circles of rouge from her rough pot applied to her cheeks…

    oh wait, that was my great grandmother, his mother in law.

    He never failed to complement her about something and I never failed to have to leave the room… or face his wrath.

    Which solicited this response:

    LOL2! I can just picture your great gran, Stephanie.

    Oddly enough, I can offer up a perfect New England contrast to that Southern vision of loveliness, although NE has certainly relaxed its “standards” over the years since then. According to my grandmother, my father, as a child, once watched his own grandmother floating down the stairs, dressed for a party, and couldn’t help exclaiming, “You look beautiful!” to which she replied, “I didn’t ask you for your opinion.” Making such unsolicited “personal remarks” was totally outside the pale. The only time my father would ever comment on my own appearance was to tell me my slip was showing (how long ago was that!) or ask me to put a bobby pin in my hair so that he could see both of my eyes. We didn’t use certain tones of voice either.

    Perfect contrast between the sensibilities of the north v the south. And another reason to demand Damn Yankees vacate the South forthwith!

  137. alppuccino says:

    “You’ve changed your hair. And you’re still ugly.”

    Is that sexual harassment?

  138. alppuccino says:

    Hostile work environment:

    “You look nice today.”

    “Those pants don’t make you look fat. They make me look skinny. Can I stand next to you all day?”

    “Did you eat roadkill again for breakfast? Here’s a Tic-Tac.”

    “I have no sexual feelings toward you whatsoever. Aside from the fear of venereal disease, your underbite is quite off-putting.”

    See? It’s a rocky, unnavigable river, this ‘workplace’.

  139. McGehee says:

    “Would you like to come up to my suite? I have a shirt that needs ironing.”

    ….What?

  140. JHoward says:

    Both Malor and Rubin are lawyers.

    WRT Ace, AFAIK, Malor has always been an unconservative establishmentarian.

  141. JHoward says:

    Although windows at two bank branches and a Whole Foods store were broken

    Whole Paycheck reassesses its urbanist proclivities and begins dismantling its greenie sensibilities, realigns toward the slightly upscale Walmart shopper on the outskirts of each former urban market, promptly adds 6% to its 2012 chainwide revenues.

    While employing normal people for the first time in its history.

  142. Matt says:

    Just quickly from a legal perspective, I’m tired of whatever off color comment he made being called sexual harassment. The news media and entertainment industry have turned the idea of “sexual harassment” into this thing where any off color comment made towards a woman, that she doesn’t appreciate, is sexual harassment. No, no, its not. Sexual harassment is a pattern and practice of words and actions, by a person in a position of power, even after the person has been asked, either by the individual or by the3 company, to stop the acts making the person uncomfortable. Calling a woman “honey”, coming on to a woman (whether you’re married or not), making a sexual remark or joke, none of those things are sexual harrassment because its a one time incident. Now, if it turns out Cain made numerous comments to the same woman over time and she reported him, then she was fired or banished from the campaign, THEN you’d have a potential sexual harassment claim. It doesn’t sound like that’s the case in this situation. And I’ve done plenty of litigation where the claim is baseless but its cheaper and less damaging to one’s reputation to pay a nuisance value settlement and get a confidentiality agreement.

  143. Ernst Schreiber says:

    In the twitterverse only people with something to hide take the cheap way out. The rest of us are expected to chance bankruptcy on account of teh fierce moral urgency of sacred honor! or some such.

  144. Slartibartfast says:

    “I’ve noticed the fine quality of your work, recently. Would you mind trying your hand at making me a sandwich?”

  145. DarthLevin says:

    In the twitterverse only people with something to hide take the cheap way out.

    It is hard to use the “thesis, evidence, argument, conclusion” format in 140 characters.

  146. Carin says:

    “I’ve noticed the fine quality of your work, recently. Would you mind trying your hand at making me a sandwich?”

    That’s hot.

    Wait, wut?

    I’m doing this wrong, I think.

  147. geoffb says:

    From Treacher, “The Cain Scrutiny

    Day 4. We still don’t know exactly what Herman Cain is supposed to have done wrong or who claimed he did, but a lack of facts doesn’t mean it’s not news. For the latest dearth of details, let’s go to the Associated Press: “A third former employee considered filing a workplace complaint against Herman Cain over what she considered aggressive and unwanted behavior when she and Cain, now a Republican presidential candidate, worked together during the late 1990s, the woman told The Associated Press on Wednesday. She said the behavior included a private invitation to his corporate apartment… The woman spoke only on condition of anonymity, saying she feared retaliation. She was located and approached by the AP as part of its investigation into harassment complaints against Cain that were disclosed in recent days and have thrown his presidential campaign into turmoil.” Who is this woman? What did Cain do or say to her? The AP doesn’t seem to care, so apparently we shouldn’t either.

    Located how if she wanted anonymity? It also seems that every story is out of the 3-4 year period he headed the National Restaurant Association. Could that be a clue as to where the original source was at the time? Seems a dearth of inquiring minds in the press, again see Libby Scooter.

  148. serr8d says:

    Disheartening.

    http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2011/11/01/response-comments-herman-cain-post/

    I think he’s not bereft of valid points, though.

  149. Carin says:

    Yea, I’m a regular reader of white house dossier. I don’t agree with him though in some of his conclusions. accusations and settlements do not equal guilt.

  150. geoffb says:

    From serr8d’s link.

    Many people honestly believe these reporters have shown bad judgment and done poor reporting, and I respect that, even if I disagree. But I don’t respect the viciousness of the attacks hurled their way, the assumptions of evil intent. And I won’t join in this.

    This is the most important election since at least 1980. People need the facts, even if they are unpleasant. And they need honest assessments of what the facts mean. And that’s what I’ll always try to give you.

    There are always two explanations for the behavior of those on the left when reality collides with it. They are either stupid or evil. They always choose to admit to, at most, stupid and then expect us to still believe in their competence.

    All his arguments in this piece were deconstructed by people here, mainly our host, yesterday. Facts. What fucking facts. Assertions, and even those done in the vague manner designed to lead thoughts to a place that is where they wish them but have no facts to actually get there.

    Haven’t others noticed over the years that they left makes deft use of the various agreements, conventions, rules, regulations, laws, of confidentiality and privilege to make attacks where defense cannot be done because of those secrecy agreements? They have done this for decades.

  151. cranky-d says:

    The Frankfurt School would be proud of what they have created. They provided the tools to destroy any enemy of the state. Of course, people had to first be taught to accept those tools, but since people are, for the most part, sheep, that was easy.

    Go with your emotions. Embrace your inner child.

    If Cain is destroyed by this, it will be the fault of people who prefer to be led around by their noses and their feelings instead of using reason. Progressives like using emotion to motivate people because it’s easy. Supposed Republican supporters use emotion because the left has provided a framework built on emotion to judge others and too many Republicans are too damn lazy to reject that framework. Those stalwarts will lead us to our own destruction, and will have the nerve to act surprised when we get there.

    Screw them. Once the left convinced everyone that an accusation is as good as the crime, to the point that even “Republicans” will go along with that premise, it was over.

    Cain has most likely done nothing wrong. There is no evidence that he did anything wrong. That no longer matters, because the modern left, which can be traced directly back to the Frankfurt School, owns the narrative, and very few seem to have a problem with that.

  152. Ernst Schreiber says:

    People need the facts, even if they are unpleasant.

    Since when have allegation and innuendo become synomyms for fact?

  153. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Shoulda finished reading geoff before I opined.

    Right on brother, right on.

  154. geoffb says:

    A reasonably short piece on The Frankfort School.

  155. Pablo says:

    Look, more “facts”. All that’s missing is the facts. But, “sources report”, so let’s go to press!

  156. sdferr says:

    Cranky-d, your citation of the Frankfurt School, and viewing a bit of the vids your recommendation has tossed up, reminds me of a comment I ran into at Ricochet a few days ago. An extreme gist of the Frankfurt argument is: “deny nature” and all is possible. So chasing into the link at the comment, so into the text of Strauss’ Symposium Lecture, we have:

    The erotic life is private life, and therefore there is a fundamental tension between the two. I can illustrate this as follows: There was a man who in a way demanded absolute politicization and that was Marx. Marx spoke of the collectivization of man to be brought about by the communist society. All privacy, all private property, as well as all misery, is connected with the division of labor, and therefore the perfect society would be one in which the division of labor is completely abolished. But the same Marx, at least in his early writings, mentions the fact that the root of the division of labor is man’s bisexuality. He says in so many words that the fundamental act of the division of labor is the sexual act. The paradoxical conclusion would be that perfect communism would have to abolish sexual difference and produce men in test tubes.

  157. geoffb says:

    From my link above in response to sdferr.

    Other key members who join up around this time are Theodore Adorno, and, most importantly, Erich Fromm and Herbert Marcuse. Fromm and Marcuse introduce an element which is central to Political Correctness, and that’s the sexual element. And particularly Marcuse, who in his own writings calls for a society of “polymorphous perversity,” that is his definition of the future of the world that they want to create. Marcuse in particular by the 1930s is writing some very extreme stuff on the need for sexual liberation, but this runs through the whole Institute. So do most of the themes we see in Political Correctness, again in the early 30s. In Fromm’s view, masculinity and femininity were not reflections of ‘essential’ sexual differences, as the Romantics had thought. They were derived instead from differences in life functions, which were in part socially determined.” Sex is a construct; sexual differences are a construct.

  158. geoffb says:

    And apparently we shall see what is what in the near future.

  159. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Wasn’t Bill Ayers sticking it to the man by sticking it to Terry Robbins when he wasn’t sticking it to Bernardine Dohrn?

    Ideologues. Whadar’ya gonna do?

  160. Stephanie says:

    The Des Moines Register has the inside scoop from “conservative radio host” Steve Deace:

    During his Oct. 3 broadcast in Iowa, Deace mentioned that Cain made a comment to a woman who was there to report on the radio interview for another news agency.

    “Cain said, ‘Darling, do you mind doctoring my tea for me?’” Deace said.

    Deace told the Register last month that he believes Cain was talking about adding honey and lemon, but that it was an awkward moment.

  161. DarthLevin says:

    Good Lord above, Miss Stephanie.

    I almost missed my fainting couch, I was clutching my pearls so hard after I read that.

    I have no doubt that a properly breathless, “Well! I never!!! ” was uttered by the poor put-upon victim of that man’s hideous behavior.

  162. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Cain mistook a reporterette for a secretary? Fucking Neanderthal!

  163. Crawford says:

    Too late. Just called gabriel malor a douche, in so many words.

    Anal douche, perhaps. Too much shit in him for the other type.

Comments are closed.