Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

"Ted Rall: Let’s Overthrow America and Imprison the President!"

And here I thought for sure Ted Rall was dead. I mean, “Whitney” has her own show. You’d think that alone would’ve been enough to convince Rall to self immolate.

Seriously. Jobs dies, and this douche is still finding ways to get air time? Can’t say that bodes well for those of you who believe in a benevolent God.

At any rate, having Rall pop up got me all nostalgic. So here are a couple blasts from the pw past: “Ted Rall’s Internal Monologue” and “10 things Ted Rall has called his penis at one time or another (confirmed)*”.

Ah. Good times.

73 Replies to “"Ted Rall: Let’s Overthrow America and Imprison the President!"”

  1. sdferr says:

    I am happy to see that Rall says he won’t be happy until blah blah blah blah, since I can look forward to seeing Rall unhappy the rest of his miserable life. To which, yays!

  2. cranky-d says:

    Teddy is begging for a punch in the face. What a tool.

  3. happyfeet says:

    Diane’s not sitting on Jacky’s lap he doesn’t have his hands between her knees cause both of them are busy busy busy cause of they are part of a movement to stop the eternal rape of the 99% by the 1%, and that’s hungry work. Buy you can help Jack and Diane BAR HUNGER! Have a tasty Snickers!

  4. sdferr says:

    It’s all cool cranky-d, he punches himself!

  5. happyfeet says:

    *But* you can help I mean

  6. sdferr says:

    Or, sell pizza hf:

    What’s really appalling about Simon’s piece, though, is that he doesn’t seem to have put the slightest thought into what he was writing. “In business, you don’t have to feed the hungry”? What the hell does Roger Simon think a pizza chain does?

  7. happyfeet says:

    I like stuffed crust pizza!

    I am the 99%!

  8. McGehee says:

    Herman Cain has one more upside since yesterday: he never contemplated using Doritos in his pizza crusts.

  9. dicentra says:

    Who’s Whitney?

  10. dicentra says:

    Oh, I believe in a Benevolent God. I just also believe that He has a sick sense of humor.

  11. geoffb says:

    Assuming this show which I’ve seen ads for.

  12. bh says:

    OT: Al Davis died.

  13. buzz4t says:

    Yes, Ted. Let’s do that. Let me know the moment you put yourself into personal danger as opposed to drawing those cartoons that look like my cat threw up on a piece of paper.

  14. motionview says:

    Whitney is a sign of the End of Times, or some untalented, un-pretty, unfunny woman who must be sleeping with someone at some network and has in turn been given a TV show.

  15. dicentra says:

    My cat’s barf has more socially redeeming value than Rall’s cartoons.

    Anyone’s cat’s barf does.

    Also, Jeff’s stream-of-consciousness bit is a masterpiece. I noticed that Whittle thought it awesome.

  16. dicentra says:

    What network carries Whitney?

    Please say cable. Then I’ll never accidentally click through.

  17. dicentra says:

    OT: Please feel free to skip this comment if you don’t give a rip about religious questions.

    [I do appreciate that the pw crowd doesn’t get all stupid about religion: LDS, atheist, Catholic, agnostic, Protestant, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, Muslim, whatever, as long as you’re also a Classical Liberal, you’re OK here.]

    Is anyone else annoyed that the Robert “Mormonism is a non-Christian cult” Jeffress threads have become so long?

    I mean, I expect that kind of thing is expected at Hot Air, but at The Corner?

    I only dipped in at the beginning; I know that if I go back I’ll end up saying something extremely intemperate, and with the reputation of 14 million+ other people on my back, I’d rather say nothing more than deliver a bitch-slap that I can’t take back.

    So I’ll say it here.

    <personal rant>

    None of us LDS gives a rip about who calls themselves Christians. You think Christ is the Redeemer? You try to follow the teachings of Christ? You’re a Christian as far as we care: end of story. The fact that you answer certain theological questions differently than we do is irrelevant. If you repent of your sins and have faith in Christ, you’re going to receive the same blessings regardless of the denomination you belong to. Shewt, even if you’re not Christian and repent of your sins, you get the blessings. (And it’s a good thing, else the world would have devoured itself ages ago.)

    You think we’ve got it all wrong? Fine! So do most people! That’s OK. Not only is it your God-given right to think we’re up in the night, our eleventh article of faith explicitly states:

    We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they may.

    So why is it necessary to use terms such as “cult” and “non-Christian” when talking about us? Say we’re weird, say we’re wrong, say we’re dead wrong, say we’re misguided, but why the mischaracterizations?

    I’ll tell you why: It’s because Protestants don’t want to accept our baptisms as legitimate.

    Which is fine; we don’t accept theirs, but there’s kind of a “baptism exchange” among many Protestant denominations, where if you were baptized as a Methodist, and you join up with the Presbyterians, you don’t need to be baptized again. Something like that.

    Again, the Protestants are entitled to do what they want regarding baptism, and we’re not bothered by the fact that if a Mormon becomes a Baptist, they insist that the person get baptized again.

    But to justify not accepting LDS baptisms in the “baptism exchange,” there has to be a reason, and so they decided that we don’t qualify as Christians; ergo, our baptisms are not valid.

    And why are we not Christians? Because we believe in the wrong Jesus.

    See, the LDS and traditional Christians might all believe that Yeshua bar Yusef of Nazareth, whose life is chronicled in the New Testament, was the Son of God and that His Atonement cleanses us from sin, etc., but because the LDS don’t accept some of the post-apostolic doctrines that other Christians do, then we’re not Christian. We don’t accept the Nicean Creed, for example, and we answer the Faith vs. Works question differently than Protestants, and we don’t teach that the Trinity is three persons, one essence. [We teach three distinct beings with one mission; ergo, you can’t worship them separately the way you could with pagan pantheons.]

    Apparently, Jesus was pretty clear on that point: either you get the theological esoterics right, or I’ll pass you over for that salvation thing, regardless of how much faith you may have in Me. And if your non-Biblical scriptures say stuff like this, you’re still not Christian:

    Helaman 8
    14 Yea, did not [Moses] bear record that the Son of God should come? And as he lifted up the brazen serpent in the wilderness, even so shall he be lifted up who should come.

    15 And as many as should look upon that serpent should live, even so as many as should look upon the Son of God with faith, having a contrite spirit, might live, even unto that life which is eternal.

    3 Nephi 27
    19 And no unclean thing can enter into his kingdom; therefore nothing entereth into his rest save it be those who have washed their garments in my blood, because of their faith, and the repentance of all their sins, and their faithfulness unto the end.

    2 Nephi 25
    23 For we labor diligently to write, to persuade our children, and also our brethren, to believe in Christ, and to be reconciled to God; for we know that it is by grace that we are saved, after all we can do.

    24 And, notwithstanding we believe in Christ, we keep the law of Moses, and look forward with steadfastness unto Christ, until the law shall be fulfilled.

    25 For, for this end was the law given; wherefore the law hath become dead unto us, and we are made alive in Christ because of our faith; yet we keep the law because of the commandments.

    26 And we talk of Christ, we rejoice in Christ, we preach of Christ, we prophesy of Christ, and we write according to our prophecies, that our children may know to what source they may look for a remission of their sins.

    Doctrine & Covenants 19
    29 And thou shalt declare glad tidings, yea, publish it upon the mountains, and upon every high place, and among every people that thou shalt be permitted to see.

    30 And thou shalt do it with all humility, trusting in me, reviling not against revilers.

    31 And of tenets thou shalt not talk, but thou shalt declare repentance and faith on the Savior, and remission of sins by baptism, and by fire, yea, even the Holy Ghost.

    See, if you believe the stuff I just quoted, you’re not a Christian unless you also conform to the Nicene Creed. Which Jesus clearly taught.

    I don’t mind that people thing we’re wrong. Everyone thinks that most everyone else is wrong about religion. But please stop with the mischaracterizations, the slurs, the lies, and the attacks.

    Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, people! Can we not leave the question of Who Is A True Christian to Judgment Day, and let The Man Himself sort it out?

    Sheesh.

    </personal rant>

    Thanks for your indulgence. I feel better now.

  18. happyfeet says:

    this Jeffress creep is a hole Mr. Governor Perry shouldn’t be hanging around with trash like that if he wants to be president cause it doesn;t reflect well on him

    can I get an amen

  19. happyfeet says:

    also we need a president what will address the semicolon menace head on

  20. sdferr says:

    “address the semicolon menace head on”

    But do it without taking our righthandlittlefingers away.

    Amen.

    Federal dollars for righthandlittlefinger-retraining programs!

  21. Pablo says:

    This is nothing new for this particular degenerate.

  22. serr8d says:

    Those golden plates would be worth a fortune today, if someone could find ’em.

  23. LBascom says:

    Di, all I can do is suggest you contemplate 2Cr 10:12

    For we dare not make ourselves of the number, or compare ourselves with some that commend themselves: but they measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise.

    .

  24. BT says:

    All you need is love

  25. dicentra says:

    Those golden plates would be worth a fortune today, if someone could find ‘em.

    You’d have to wrassle them out of the hands of an angel.

    Who can float. It’d be over before you started.

    2 Cr. 10:12

    Oh, I know. It’s just frustrating that people accuse us of being awful because we believe X, Y, and Z, and half the time, what they’re accusing us of isn’t even accurate.

    It’s OK if you think we’re wrong. It’s not OK if you spread falsities about what we believe. It’s exactly and precisely the same thing the Left does to conservatives, but I tell you, it’s harder to convince an anti-Mormon Christian that we don’t believe X or we do believe Y than it is to persuade a Lefty that he doesn’t get Middle America.

  26. happyfeet says:

    on christ the solid rock i stand all other ground is sinking sand

  27. newrouter says:

    “all other ground is sinking sand”

    stop the frac NOW!!

  28. happyfeet says:

    well i guess it would be nice if i could touch your body i know not everybody has got a body like you

  29. happyfeet says:

    those are my two songs about faith I probably have more but I’m a go eat a hamburger

  30. BBHunter says:

    […but I tell you, it’s harder to convince an anti-Mormon Christian that we don’t believe X or we do believe Y than it is to persuade a Lefty that he doesn’t get Middle America.]

    – Attempting to convince antagonists of the error of their slander, agitprop they know is false but serves their agenda, is like ordering enchalada’s in a Chinese restaurant, or ecpecting Maria to at least let Arnold keep his nut-sack.

  31. newrouter says:

    “but I’m a go eat a hamburger”

    oh please stop the frac Now!!11!!

  32. NoisyAndrew says:

    Don’t feel bad, Di. We Papists wrote accept the Nicene Creed, and we still get denied the status of “Christian” by the evangelicals when their blood grape juice gets up.

    Because Apostolic Authority means that I worship the Pope.

    Do I consider Mormons Christian? Based on what you say, I’d say “yeah, in the same way that Jacobites and Coptics are.” Which is to say, outside of what I’d consider orthodoxy, for whatever that might mean. Fortunately these questions no longer require the spilling of grape juice.

  33. steph says:

    My favorite hymm? How Great Thou Art.
    It wasn’t ever my favorite, it was in fact my least favorite of hymms, something too luther about it, until we sang it at my Grandfather’s and then my Father’s “going home” ceremonial.
    Oh Lord my God, when I in awesome wonder
    Consider All the works thy hand hath made.

  34. steph says:

    Then sings my soul!

  35. BBHunter says:

    – Hey, you think you’ve got problems….try walking a few miles in an Agnostics shoes.

    – Whatever happened to the book of Mary anyway?…..Huh?…..huh?….!!11onety!!!eleven

  36. steph says:

    in humble adoration

  37. NoisyAndrew says:

    Whatever happened to the book of Mary anyway?

    You mean the Gnostic Gospel?

    It was full of Gnosticism. Didn’t make the cut. The rest is bestselling tedium.

  38. bh says:

    – Hey, you think you’ve got problems….try walking a few miles in an Agnostics shoes.

    I’ve always thought we have it pretty easy, BBH. Hmmm… beats me tends to keep any argument from getting too hot or complicated.

  39. steph says:

    what JOY shall fill my heart

  40. BBHunter says:

    – Yeh, that Gnosticism stuff can be a real pita whem you’re trying to gain control of the flock, particularly when it raises the voting stock of a mere woman.

  41. steph says:

    my Saviour God to ME!

  42. BBHunter says:

    – Quick, someone put on a Black Sabbeth track, steph has gone into thrall…..

  43. serr8d says:

    Heh. I recall fondly some studies, back in my very early teens, conducted by helpful teachers at the Church of Christ I attended, on how to ‘save’ Mormons and Catholics from the errors of their ways. Some of those teachings still bubble up every now and then, unexpectedly.

    We, of the Church of Christ, always felt that WE were the ones who followed original authorial intent, and insisted on only using the original text, so much so that, well, you probably know what was said of us.

    There’s this other place I visit occasionally where original intent is considered sacrosanct, and the author’s written text is good enough without further interpretations. Can’t put my finger on where that is just at the moment… )

    Oh. All of those hymns are very good, if you remember to do it in style a cappella only. There’s no scripture allowing otherwise. )

  44. dicentra says:

    Parody or real?

    Do I consider Mormons Christian?

    The only vote that counts gets cast on Judgment Day: everyone else’s opinion is just spitballin’

  45. NoisyAndrew says:

    – Yeh, that Gnosticism stuff can be a real pita whem you’re trying to gain control of the flock, particularly when it raises the voting stock of a mere woman.

    Closing quote of the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas, which got found at Babi Yar with the Dead Sea Scrolls and gets a shout-out in Stigmata:

    114. Simon Peter said to them, “Make Mary leave us, for females don’t deserve life.”

    Jesus said, “Look, I will guide her to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every female who makes herself male will enter the kingdom of Heaven.”

    Oh yeah. Gnosticism was super-feminist. But whatever, I’m sure Jesus and Mary Magdalene had a split-level in the South of France, and that their powerful seed brought forth such fine followers of the Savior’s teaching as Clotaire the Old and the rest of the Merovingians.

    The only vote that counts gets cast on Judgment Day: everyone else’s opinion is just spitballin’

    Preach. And if C.S. Lewis is right, God cares way less about Christianity than he does about Christ.

  46. Slartibartfast says:

    I’m not too keen on being on either end of a lecture about who’s not going to Heaven. That’s a question that only God can answer, and His answers tend to be rather cryptic, which I take to be either deliberate or some personal failure of mine.

  47. leigh says:

    I’m a Roman Catholic, so we take a lot of smack talk about that “worshipping statues” and such. We’re the OG Christians. We can deal with it.

  48. SDN says:

    Slart, one of my favorite religious jokes concerns the Wiccan who died and ended up at the Pearly Gates. He’s kind of depressed and asks Peter what happens now? Peter takes him and leads him off to a path that circles around the Gates and the next thing he knows he’s in the Summerlands. Peter tells him to run along. He looks up and notices a group of figures weeping on a hillside. He looks closer and it’s Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Fred Phelps, etc. So he asked Peter what’s up with them. Peter says, “Oh, they’re being punished. God doesn’t like being told He can’t invite someone to His house.”

  49. BBHunter says:

    “Oh yeah. Gnosticism was super-feminist.”

    – Jesus was not a Gnostic, he was an essene, but whatever. The Apostles all reflected the cultural male dominated dogma of the time.

    – Apparently whomever penned the books did not share that attitude. At least one possible reason for their demise.

  50. LBascom says:

    “I’m not too keen on being on either end of a lecture about who’s not going to Heaven.”

    Mat 7:13-16 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide [is] the gate, and broad [is] the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait [is] the gate, and narrow [is] the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

    .

    God is all about individual free choice.

    And consequences.

  51. Slartibartfast says:

    I like PW’s Ted Rall disgust pretty much since Let’s Rall.

    And then there’s this, which I also liked but mysteriously refrained from commenting on.

  52. John Bradley says:

    “Now get on your knees and polish my boot with your hairless, little boy nipples… You might feel a stir, but don’t sweat it. You’re attracted to my power is all.”

    Am. Not. Worthy.

  53. NoisyAndrew says:

    – Jesus was not a Gnostic, he was an essene, but whatever.

    You shift goalposts like a champ. You should work for the NFL.

    So claiming the authority forgive sins and perform exorcisms was standard-issue Essene practice?

    – Apparently whomever penned the books did not share that attitude. At least one possible reason for their demise.

    Yeah, in a world where Deep and Dark CONSPIRACIES and Teh SEXISM!!!eleventy! are the sole criterion of what cultures pass on. Outside of noire novels and Foucault screeds, though, people wonder if the fact that the Gospel of Mary was written after the first century, bore small resemblance to other Christian writings, and was only heard of in the circles of Neo-Platonists who were hijacking the words of Yeshua bar Yusuf to justify their jagoff “spirit good, matter bad” theosophy might have had something to do with it not making the cut.

    But whatever, Templars! John looks like a chick!

  54. Ernst Schreiber says:

    If Jesus was an Essene, what was he doing hanging around with Galileans instead of chilling by the Dead Sea? And that whole Temple episode? Very un-Essene like!

  55. BBHunter says:

    – Switch Goalposts??? *snort*

    – You need to seriously consider trying decaf sport.

    – Someone points out a rather curious bit of religious editing and you get all stick-up-your ass about it.

    – Relax – you might live longer.

  56. BBHunter says:

    “[And that whole Temple episode?]

    – Even God hates the IRS.

  57. Ernst Schreiber says:

    – Even God hates the IRS.

    The point being that the Essenes refused to have anything to do with the Temple.

  58. Mueller says:

    dicentra posted on 10/8 @ 3:31 pm
    Oh, I believe in a Benevolent God. I just also believe that He has a sick sense of humor.

    I prefer to think of it as a finely honed sense of irony along with the knowledge that everything we do is somehow absurd.
    He’s not laughing WITH us. He’s laughing AT us.
    I can’t say I blame him.

  59. Slartibartfast says:

    You guys are going all Depeche Mode on us.

  60. Slartibartfast says:

    I mean, I don’t want to start any blasphemous rumours.

  61. Carin says:

    Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, people! Can we not leave the question of Who Is A True Christian to Judgment Day, and let The Man Himself sort it out?

    A few years back I was a part of a homeschooling group, and one of the members was Mormon. another was of some evangelical doctrine (don’t remember which one) . The husband of the one didn’t like his wife hanging out with the Mormon mom, because she wasn’t a Christian. I was all :@ until I was informed that he didn’t like her hanging with me either, because I was also a non-Christian as a Catholic.

  62. B. Moe says:

    This looks like a good place to throw out a weird thought I had the other day: isn’t atheism just as faith-based as religion? You can’t absolutely prove there isn’t a God/Supreme Being/Advanced Conciousness any more than you can prove their is, can you?

  63. Jeff G. says:

    I’ve been arguing that with atheists for years. I’m agnostic. Because I’m logical. Just the way God wired us. Or, if not him, nobody.

    Hard to say, really.

  64. McGehee says:

    The Angel of God told me, and not any of you unworthies, that God doesn’t quite get why anyone would argue about which team jersey He wears.

  65. NoisyAndrew says:

    – Switch Goalposts??? *snort*

    – You need to seriously consider trying decaf sport.

    – Someone points out a rather curious bit of religious editing and you get all stick-up-your ass about it.

    – Relax – you might live longer.

    Oh, was I too aggressive in pointing out how wrong you were? I didn’t know I was supposed to use Nerf Bats. My bad.

    I just find the use of Gnostic Gospels as a cudgel with which to beat the Early Church by people who don’t know much about Gnosticism or Early Christianity rather off-putting.

    I’m the asshole.

  66. BBHunter says:

    “I’m the asshole.

    – Well, nobodies perfect, but that’s being a little harsh on yourself.

    – Aside from that, anyone who’s ignorant of even the correct sect that Jesus belonged to might want to refrain from pretending expertise in the subject, but you certainly have the right to keep making stupid statements. Your call.

  67. Ernst Schreiber says:

    [A]nyone who’s ignorant of even the correct sect that Jesus belonged to might want to refrain from pretending expertise in the subject, but you certainly have the right to keep making stupid statements. Your call.

    Good advice. You should take it.

    Or, you know, make an argument supported by something other than stupid statements assertion.

  68. serr8d says:

    You guys are going all Depeche Mode on us.

    That reference escapes me.

    But this seems correct enough.

  69. Slartibartfast says:

    I was thinking more along these lines, serr8d.

  70. NoisyAndrew says:

    I just got off the phone with God. He wants me to stop being a smarmy little know-it-all.

    So lemme try a new tack.

    Jesus wasn’t an Essene in any meaningful sense. There are elements of Essene thought in his teachings, but Essenes were rather monastic in their approach to life, and Jesus was not. This is one of the reasons why I find the Gnostic hijacking of Him so ridiculous. Gnosticism is esoteric; salvation comes to those who penetrate the deep secret; reality is itself a conspiracy. That was never Jesus’ approach. What he had to say, he said, to the confoundment of others.

    When I see anything that smacks of Dan Brownery, I tend to start punching. Because that book sucked on historical, theological, and literary levels. Especially I don’t respect the premise underpinning it: that the Church ignored the Gospel of Mary Magdalene’s ahistoricity and Gnosticism, but rejected it from the canon because it had three kind words to say for the woman that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John all say was the first one to know of the Resurrection.

    To me, this isn’t about being Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant, Mormon, etc. This is the essence of the faith. If Jesus was nothing more than a guy with some ideas, then he was not all that important and possibly out of his mind. In which case, as Paul puts it, “if Christ has not been raised, all your faith is in vain.” (1 Cor 15-17)

Comments are closed.