The argument? That the act of verifying legal status is itself harmful to legal immigrants. Meaning, the only way to avoid harming legals is to ignore the status of illegals, whose illegal consumption of state resources harms legals and natural born citizens alike.
Up is down. Black is white. Harley Davidson is the Marlboro Man.
Lay off my boots Harley, I’m in no fucking mood.
That might be the worst mismatch between photo and caption that I’ve ever seen.
Does seem as though a certain quantum of self-outing would be entailed in such a response (“staying home”), doesn’t it?
That is odd, bh. Although, I’m not quite certain how you would capture a photo of thousands of hispanic workers staying at home, but it seems that you could do better than “hundreds of white folks standing around a cop.”
Hmmm, I think he’s a priest, Hadlowe.
Fucking idiotic. They check the shit out of someone’s status when they apply for a visa to be here legally…why the hell would they mind having it checked if they have a valid visa? What the douche gargling Pelosi on a pogo-stick?!? I frikken hate what passes for progressive “thought”.
Oh no! Not difficulties in routine dealings?! We can’t have that!
Call the white house, press 3 for english, and beg them to keep protecting us from difficulties in routine dealings. That’s what government does.
I have to go through a fucking metal detector damn near anyplace I want to go anymore that’s in a “public” building. I have zero sympathy for anybody worried about “difficulties in routine dealings.” Get back to me when the welfare office has those goddamn metal detectors.
Apparently no one in the Obama admin has ever tried to get tech support for damn near anything. “Difficulties in routine dealings” my ass.
no mention of gunwalker
Link
This is EXACTLY what produced the housing crisis: Even having the questions about income, credit history, etc. on the application form might offend someone, so the banks omitted them. Which means you can’t ask anyone about these things.
Either the same standards apply to everyone, or they apply to no one. In which case, why have them at all? (Except, of course, for the selective enforcement value.)