What did they know and when did they know it?
And more importantly, what is it that they are trying to cover up, and why?
At this point, I wouldn’t be surprised if it turns out the White House was using Solyndra to ship assault weapons to Mexican drug cartels at a 50% loss. Would you?
(thanks to geoffB and Doug Ross)
Nah, no way Solyndra was involved in moving product at only a 50% loss. A 50% loss would be described as “just about ready to turn the corner” and receive another infusion of taxpayer cash.
Now if we were talking 60% loss, then yes, I could buy into your scenario.
Pffft. Why are you writing about this when there’s a new season of Glee?
I like this from the WH:
The only reason O’Reilly is in Iraq is because State doesn’t have a consulate at the bottom of the Mariana Trench.
This should be a bigger deal than Watergate, which cost no lives.
I’m really hating modern journalism, even more so than I hate modern LeftLibProgg ideology.
I’m really hating a government that’s operating like the fucking Gambino crime family, and is so confident of the willing compliance of every armed Federal agency that it doesn’t even bother to hide it.
[…] “Emails show Operation Fast and Furious was shared with Obama counterterrorism adviser John Brenna… […]
I remember a BATF stooge testified to Congress that they attempted to use GPS trackers embedded in the “walked” guns but ran into problems with battery life. Solution? Slap a Solyndra panel on the butt stock and — presto! — you’ve got, well, something to go on.