It’s a balanced approach to deficit reductionthat we need, you see. Because the American people want compromise. And what better way to insure compromise on spending cuts than to stack this ridiculous “super committee” with some of the biggest spenders in Congress? CNS:
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) announced today that she has assigned Assistant Democratic Leader James E. Clyburn (S.C.), Democratic Caucus Vice Chairman Xavier Becerra (Calif.) and Budget Committee Ranking Member Chris Van Hollen (Md.) to serve on the panel. Previously, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid had named Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.), Sen. John Kerry (Mass.) and Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus (Mont.) to serve on the committee.
None of these Democrats had voting records that scored even as high as 10 percent in the NTU’s annual rating of Congress for last year. Among the six, Rep. Clyburn earned the lowest score of 2 percent and Sen. Baucus earned the highest score of 9 percent. Rep. Van Hollen earned a score of 4 percent and Rep. Becerra and Senators Murray and Kerry earned scores of 6 percent.
In [National Taxpayers Union] rating system, all members of Congress who score below 20 percent for their voting record are given a grade of “F” and named a “Big Spender.”
[…]
The NTU, a nonpartisan organization, grades all members of Congress each year on the stands they take on “every vote that significantly affects taxes, spending, debt, and regulatory burdens on consumers and taxpayers.” In 2010, the group scored 165 votes in the House and 145 in the Senate.
“Unlike most organizations that publish ratings, we refuse to play the ‘rating game’ of focusing on only a handful of congressional votes on selected issues,” NTU says of its congressional scoring. “The NTU voting study is the fairest and most accurate guide available on congressional fiscal policies. It is a completely unbiased accounting of votes.”
The median NTU score among Republicans in the Senate was 96 percent and in the House 88 percent. The median NTU score among Democrats was 7 percent in both the Senate and House.
Best deal we could get!
And when this goes south? I’ll join with the media, the GOP cognescenti, the Democrats, et al., and put the blame right where it’s deserved: on the intransigent TEA Party purists who warned that this deal would once again end up screwing the citizenry and lead to no real positive change for the nation.
Bottom line: either the GOP agrees to raise “revenue” and fix “loopholes” in the tax code to prevent “tax expenditures,” or the military takes the brunt of the triggered cuts. The rest are on Medicare providers, not on Medicare entitlements, and so do nothing really to address the underlying problems. It just punishes the productive at the expense of the takers.
So it’s a lose, lose.
Which, if you’re part of the GOP establishment, you spin as a win!
Somebody send Bill Kristol a nice floral arrangement. In the shape of a Hobbit flipping him the bird.
or a bird flipping him a hobbit.
how did the Rs on the panel score?
mostly squish with upton as their leading light
Link
Link
Link
Obama’s little rhetorical temper tantrum today was a paint by numbers set-up for later casting blame on the deadlocked super-committee who just won’t get along. He’s a cheap ass doofus this Obama character, who’ll refuse to spend any time working at what he ought.
Now we know how Obama plans to lose in Afghanistan: The Tea-Party led Republican Congress will have defunded the war for him.
Link
And on the Republican side, only one of the six, Toomey, voted against the debt limit increase. Even in Vegas the games aren’t this badly rigged.
The country(and maybe the world) is now clearly divided into two groups, the looters and the looties.
The looties better get together and repel the mob, or civilization will turn to ashes.
The looties better get together and repel the mob, or civilization will turn to ashes.
I’m just hiding all my stuff, so that the mob has nothing to loot. Without a prize to share, they’ll soon turn on one another. In the end, I get the same result (fewer looters) without all the hard work and expense.
I’m on the “I’ve got nothing to loot” track right now. At least, if you’re talking about money saved or invested somewhere.
Am I to understand that you tea-whatsis’ think that the “super committee” might not be on the total up-and-up?
Why, that’s just CRAZY TALK!!