Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

"ATF Director Could Watch Live Video of Cartel Gun Buys–While Permitting Them to Proceed"

This just keeps getting better and better.

And by better and better, I naturally mean worse and worse.

But don’t worry. Your Democratic leaders have their priorities in place. And I, for one, have never felt safer.

49 Replies to “"ATF Director Could Watch Live Video of Cartel Gun Buys–While Permitting Them to Proceed"”

  1. Bob Reed says:

    Issa’s pretty tenacious. I wouldn’t expect him to be the one that backs down on this. Though, there is already talk about Holder being “completely unaware” of this operation. Which, you know, may be equally disturbing as if he was, IMHO.

  2. sdferr says:

    may be equally disturbing as if he was

    Hey Bob, easy man, it’s hard out there for an Attorney General trying to find a courageous man in a nation of cowards. Who’d have time left to do his job?

  3. Bob Reed says:

    That brought a funny image to mind, of Holder fancying himself a modern day Diogenes, only in his case searching for a courageous man.

    I wonder what kind of lamp Holder cum Diogenes would be using?

  4. Bob Reed says:

    Dare I suggest; a black light?

    DENOUNCED!

  5. sdferr says:

    Indeed. And concomitantly outfitted with special goggles, so he can pick-up the proper wavelengths.

  6. Ernst Schreiber says:

    This is the Obama administration’s Reichstag fire. They deliberately sought to manufacture a crisis in order to justify restricting our 2nd amendment rights.

    Okay. So maybe more of a Reichstag broom closet fire. But that buiding has a lot of closets for the opportunistically inclined.

  7. mojo says:

    “Weiner/Holder 2012!”

  8. LTC John says:

    I remember my leftish sister weeping in rage at the existential threat to the Constitution that Oliver North posed… I suspect that if I did ask about this, I would probably hear a goodly number of excuses and obfuscation on behalf of H[O!]lder.

  9. geoffb says:

    Weiner is/was just Schumer’s Mini-Me.

  10. Ernst Schreiber says:

    LTC John,

    This is way worse than anything North did. Iran-Contra wasn’t a conspiracy to deprive Americans of anything.

  11. Darleen says:

    re JeffG’s final link

    Just how long are the Christophobe Leftists going to dine out on the rare incidents of abortion clinic bombings… especially in the context that overturning abortion laws is exactly the same thing as wanting the US turned into Iran?

  12. LTC John says:

    Ernst – I remember when my sister freaked about Iran-Contra I could hardly keep a straight face – all I wanted to do was ask “WTF are you talking about?”… But trying to fund a fight against a totalitarian commie bunch by feeding weapons into a stalemate fight between Rectumheaded Dictator Scum Bag and Collection of Human Crap Sacks Running A Theocracy for $ was EVIL!!1!1! and threatened the fabric of time space, per the Left. The USG feeding weapons into a neighbor in terrible trouble with drug gangs, and some of those weapons killing USG agents/civilians on both sides of the Rio Grande….meh, Rethuglican posturing!!1!1

    Or so I would postulate.

  13. Darleen says:

    geoffb

    My only consolation lies in the fact that the Talmud predicts this exact pattern of downfall. In a startling statement that never loses either its relevance or its shock value, the Talmud (Yoma 22b) posits this rule of history: “God does not establish a political leader in a community unless he has personal secrets (stated as ‘a box full of rodents’), so that if he becomes arrogant, they will be exposed.”

    Thus, scandal is the Divine weapon of choice when a person is going beyond the appropriate bounds.

    Ha! So much for the “it was just sex” apologists!

  14. sdferr says:

    Rep Jackson-Lee: “The issue is whether or not their intent is to undermine the laws of this nation.”

    oof. Does she really want us looking closely at intentions where it comes to merely undermining? I mean, that’s a long exploration many of us wouldn’t mind in the least.

  15. Crawford says:

    Though, there is already talk about Holder being “completely unaware” of this operation. Which, you know, may be equally disturbing as if he was, IMHO.

    Of course he was. The “American guns causing Mexican chaos” was Hillary’s campaign line. And, hey, foreign state, so naturally they’d approach us through our foreign relations apparatus to deal with the issue, right?

    (I have no idea how serious I am with the above. It’s like the Schroedinger’s Cat of statements — both a joke and not a joke, simultaneously.)

  16. Joe says:

    Oh cartel gun buys…I thought you said Golf Boys.

  17. Swen says:

    And I, for one, have never felt safer.

    Of course, you’re not a Border Patrol agent or a Branch Davidian….

  18. Danger says:

    “there is already talk about Holder being “completely unaware” of this operation. Which, you know, may be equally disturbing as if he was, IMHO.”

    My theory:

    Regardless of whether or not there is a fire feeding this smoke; stalling, misdirection and pleas of ignorance will remain the modus oporandi in Hol-bama land. See, the clock is running and regardless of how tenacious he is, Issa can’t get to the Black Panthers, Gerald Walpins and Fannie & Freddies if he gets bogged down on this (or any future) investigation.

    It’s kinda like pulling teath from a squirming child with a pair of tweezers.

  19. Danger says:

    Oops missed a !

    only three !s will do for this one
    CLINK THE LINK PEOPLE!!!

  20. Danger says:

    or “click” the link (your choice;)

  21. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Just throwing this out as a “wheels within wheels” notion, but you don’t suppose that Obama might be trying to pick a fight with the Republican controlled House in order to rally his base and/or change he subject, do you?

  22. sdferr says:

    At some point Ernst it comes to be a question of what Obama isn’t trying to use to change the subject with, as opposed to what he is trying to use to change the subject with, the latter outnumbering the former as the stars outnumber the earth.

  23. Pablo says:

    OT, and yet not…maybe.

    NYT: Obama overruled top Pentagon, DOJ lawyers on Libya war powers

    We have a toddler running America.

  24. Danger says:

    Possibly Ernst,

    But the hypocrisy charge seems just a little too sticky on this one. I’m thinking he’s playing a losing hand and the dealer won’t be dealin him a new hand this time.

  25. Danger says:

    Pablo is your clinker broken? (see my 19 and 20;)

  26. sdferr says:

    Imagine

    Can’t?

    Yeah, me neither.

  27. Danger says:

    sdferr,

    Me neither, I expect a cabal of Obamapologists to line up behind the prez. Rules are only meant to keep the right wing in it’s place. When they slow down the Messiah they must have been misinterpreted.

  28. geoffb says:

    Of course he overruled them, he’s the smartest most qualified guy in any room.

    Just ask Michelle. At the link is a typical Obama briefing.

    “Okay, let’s get this CIA briefing started. What can you guys tell me about what’s going on in Egypt?”

    “Well, Mr. President, we’ve determined that Egypt is a country in North Africa.”

    “Northeast Africa, thank you very much, and I happen to know that its capital is Cairo.”

    “Thank you, Mr. President, we’ll update all of our files accordingly.”

  29. bh says:

    This thread needs a car chase. Maybe an explosion, too.

    And a cop who doesn’t care what the lieutenant says, he’s just gonna do what he needs to do.

  30. bh says:

    Vroom! Kablooey!

    “You can have my badge! I’m keeping the gun!”

  31. bh says:

    You’re welcome.

  32. sdferr says:

    It is better. But could the cop be played by a hot young Canadian juggalicious fembot?

  33. sdferr says:

    Outstanding. I tink you’ve gotta future in that game.

  34. geoffb says:

    At Belmont Club on Obama overruling the lawyers.

    n fact, one of the most interesting features of law as a system of social conventions is its ability to make things true or, to put it another way, to create legal categories that permit characterizations of situations and practices that are true or false.
    […]
    the New York Times reports that President Obama overruled the view of two his top lawyers that the “kinetic military events in Libya” amounted to hostilities. According to the President, there is “no war” in Libya? What they are arguing about is the legal truth.
    […]
    What keeps the discussion from being completely academic is the existence of non-legal reality … whether or not a “war” in Libya is legally acknowledged, in actual fact people die, international actors are drawn in, conflict may spread, munitions and money are expended — stuff happens.

    This is the other reality which Balkin describes. He writes that one of the problems inherent in legal truth is that it sometimes comes into conflict with other kinds of truth.

    I think we have had several demonstrations of the differences in truths here abouts.

  35. sdferr says:

    Meantime, in a more consequential place, with more consequential circumstances, we look away.

  36. geoffb says:

    Car chase huh? Some of my favorites there.

  37. bh says:

    Haven’t seen any of those movies, G.

    Yet, I’ve watched one of those Transformers movies, Sucker Punch, and I’m pretty sure that I imagined a trilogy of Facts of Life movies when I was falling asleep on opium about fifteen years ago.

    There’s a decent chance that this explains some larger societal issues.

    If we had the proper funding, I’d be willing to smoke some more opium. For the social sciences.

  38. geoffb says:

    Switch to hash, dream while awake.

  39. sdferr says:

    purty picture of an eclipsed moon, zap-bizzzzzztt.

  40. geoffb says:

    Hey, my new desktop, thanks.

  41. bh says:

    We thought hash was for listening to this song, playing this game, and studying this.

    And eating this.

  42. geoffb says:

    Math on hash. I’d not have thunk it. Food is good though.

  43. zino3 says:

    LTC John,

    I have been remiss in my life, and would have no life without the likes of you.

    Thank you for being who and what you are, from the bottom of my heart.

    Truly.

    TLD

  44. bh says:

    Not just any food. Harold’s chicken. Couple wings, piece of white bread to suck up some hot sauce. Grape Nehi. Probably cost about three bucks tops. Good times.

    You’re sorta right though. Not much math was completed on hash. Which we very seldom scored.

    You do math by taking stimulants.

    (I’d say I’m joking but you start pulling those classes at the end of the core, last quarter sophomore year. Anyone you ever meet from that time, that school, with that sort of major? Knows to buy the bronchodilator without the cough suppressant.)

  45. geoffb says:

    From Insty.

    I retain my suspicions about the connection between a secret ATF operation that allowed thousands of weapons to go from U.S. gunshops to Mexican crime scenes, and a public gun-control campaign by the Obama Administration that stressed the need to limit gun sales in the United States because weapons from U.S. gun shops were turning up at Mexican crime scenes. Call me cynical, but this is an awfully convenient juxtaposition.

    This would be only a more obvious, blatant really, example of the policies in all areas that have been pursued by the Progressive Democrats for many years.

    Use the government to create or exacerbate a problem. Blame the private sector and citizens for it and propose new laws that funnel power to the government agencies which were used to create the problem but who are never held accountable or even exposed as being the cause of it. Rinse-repeat until all traces of liberty are erased from the land and eventually memory.

  46. Slartibartfast says:

    …but Bush took a whole bunch of vacations, and Katrina. And stuff.

  47. serr8d says:

    What @42 said.

    Oh, and this…anyone live near Omaha ?

Comments are closed.