Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Waivers waivers waivers!

Screw the rich! (Unless, like, they’re our rich. In which case, cater to them). “Nearly 20 percent of new Obamacare waivers are gourmet restaurants, nightclubs, fancy hotels in Nancy Pelosi’s district”:

Of the 204 new Obamacare waivers President Barack Obama’s administration approved in April, 38 are for fancy eateries, hip nightclubs and decadent hotels in House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s Northern California district.

That’s in addition to the 27 new waivers for health care or drug companies and the 31 new union waivers Obama’s Department of Health and Human Services approved.

Pelosi’s district secured almost 20 percent of the latest issuance of waivers nationwide, and the companies that won them didn’t have much in common with companies throughout the rest of the country that have received Obamacare waivers.

Other common waiver recipients were labor union chapters, large corporations, financial firms and local governments. But Pelosi’s district’s waivers are the first major examples of luxurious, gourmet restaurants and hotels getting a year-long pass from Obamacare.

For instance, Boboquivari’s restaurant in Pelosi’s district in San Francisco got a waiver from Obamacare. Boboquivari’s advertises $59 porterhouse steaks, $39 filet mignons and $35 crab dinners.

Then, there’s Café des Amis, which describes its eating experience as “a timeless Parisian style brasserie” which is “located on one of San Francisco’s premier shopping and strolling boulevards, Union Street,” according to the restaurant’s Web site.

“Bacchus Management Group, in partnership with Perry Butler, is bringing you that same warm, inviting feeling, with a distinctive San Francisco spin,” the Web site reads. Somehow, though, the San Francisco upper class eatery earned itself a waiver from Obamacare because it apparently cost them too much to meet the law’s first year requirements.

The reason the Obama administration says it has given out waivers is to exempt certain companies or policyholders from “annual limit requirements.” The applications for the waivers are “reviewed on a case by case basis by department officials who look at a series of factors including whether or not a premium increase is large or if a significant number of enrollees would lose access to their current plan because the coverage would not be offered in the absence of a waiver.” The waivers don’t allow a company to permanently refrain from implementing Obamacare’s stipulations, but companies can reapply for waivers annually through 2014.

Café Mason, a diner near San Francisco’s Union Square, got a waiver too. When The Daily Caller asked the manager about the waiver and how the president’s new sweeping federal health care law was affecting his restaurant, he hung up the phone. The Franciscan Crab restaurant on Fisherman’s Wharf in San Francisco got a waiver. Its menu features entrees ranging from about $15 to $60. The Franciscan’s general manager didn’t return TheDC’s requests for comment.

Four-star hotel Campton Place got one too, as did Hotel Nikko San Francisco, which describes itself as “four-diamond luxury in the heart of the city.” Tru Spa, which Allure Magazine rated the “best day spa in San Francisco,” received an Obamacare waiver as well.

Before hanging up on TheDC, Tru Spa’s owner said new government health care regulations, both the federal-level Obamacare and new local laws in Northern California, have “devastated” the business. “It’s been bad for us,” he said, without divulging his name, referring to the new health care restrictions.

This isn’t really surprising. I mean, rich Dems, for all their ostensible redistributionist impulses, can’t themselves be expected to do without. After all, it’s harder than it looks giving away other people’s money — and such elite labor deserves at least some special dispensation, does it not?

Quips Ed Morrissey, “Just remember, ObamaCare is here to protect the poor. And Nancy Pelosi is here to protect all of the little people … who serve the rich.”

(thanks to JD)

12 Replies to “Waivers waivers waivers!”

  1. Joe says:

    Orwell had some quote about pigs. I think it works for this.

  2. Bob Reed says:

    Waivers are the new “earmarks”, or should I say join the old earmarks as instruments of patronage…

  3. JHoward says:

    rich Dems, for all their ostensible redistributionist impulses, can’t themselves be expected to do without.

    Which, oddly, they have in common with rich Socialist money-changers (accused of rape), if by “oddly” you mean naturally:

    …the newspaper said that since Strauss-Kahn and his wealthy wife, Anne Sinclair, a former television presenter, had arrived in the US capital for his IMF job in 2007 they had lived a life of luxury. The couple was said to have bought a £2.5m home in the upmarket Washington district of Georgetown. Other reports revealed that Strauss-Kahn, who allegedly earns £22,000 net a month, also has an apartment in the 16th arrondissement of Paris, which he shares with his wife and which was bought for £2.2m in 1990, another apartment on the expensive Place des Vosges in the 4th arrondissement bought in 2007 for £3.4m, and a riad in Marrakech.

    That the Strauss-Kahns are wealthy has never been a secret. Sinclair is the granddaughter of Paul Rosenberg, a celebrated dealer of modern art, and has inherited part of his collection, which is said to include at least one Picasso. In many countries, such wealth would not necessarily be viewed as an impediment to a leftwing politician’s career. In France, however, the flashiness has appalled some observers.

    “Can one be leftwing and very rich?” asked Jean-Jacques Bourdin, a commentator on French radio station RMC. “If Sarkozy represented for many the ‘bling-bling’ right then Dominique Strauss-Kahn is, whether he likes it or not, a representative of the left ‘vroom vroom’.

    It is to chuckle.

  4. Clearly, taxes need to be raised. On other people.

  5. Blake says:

    Then, Mrs. Palin made the following unhelpful remarks: ‘Unflippingbelievable! No, wait, it is believable,….”

    http://tinyurl.com/66ugu86

  6. Blake says:

    And right on queue, MSM gives us the GOP front runner due to fund raising prowess: http://tinyurl.com/3bwrflp

    After all, who is better equipped to save us from Obamacare than Mitt Romney?

  7. Carin says:

    I can’t wait until someone asks her about this.

  8. LBascom says:

    From Grover Cleveland’s Second Inaugural Address delivered March 4, 1893 (The in-eloquence of the thing may be difficult to bear after the soaring oratory of Obama, but try and forgive):

    The verdict of our voters which condemned the injustice of maintaining protection for protection’s sake enjoins upon the people’s servants the duty of exposing and destroying the brood of kindred evils which are the unwholesome progeny of paternalism. This is the bane of republican institutions and the constant peril of our government by the people. It degrades to the purposes of wily craft the plan of rule our fathers established and bequeathed to us as an object of our love and veneration. It perverts the patriotic sentiments of our countrymen and tempts them to pitiful calculation of the sordid gain to be derived from their Government’s maintenance. It undermines the self-reliance of our people and substitutes in its place dependence upon governmental favoritism. It stifles the spirit of true Americanism and stupefies every ennobling trait of American citizenship.

    Read the whole thing, I found it amazing that 95% of a speech given over a hundred years ago has so much relevance today.

  9. Squid says:

    MSM gives us the GOP front runner due to fund raising prowess

    Because that’s what this country really needs right now: an Establishment figure who’s popular with the moneyed interests.

  10. Richard Cranium says:

    You may want to look at Bill Quick’s view on this.

  11. cranky-d says:

    If SF frelled itself, that isn’t my or anyone else’s problem. Special treatment is special treatment, and bad law is bad law, no matter the circumstances.

  12. David Block says:

    IF this Obamacare is full of so much sweetness and light, why are most of the Democratic supporting union thugs and all trying to get waivers from being under it?

    Gee, they must know something else about it.

    I hate Democrats Socialists.

Comments are closed.