Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Dirty Socialist Vermont Public Radio [Dan Collins]

“reports” on the Tea Party in Montpelier yesterday, being a companion piece to happyfeet’s comment, here.

This morning, after driving Aidan to school, I heard VPR’s mention of the Tea Party rally at the State Capitol.  Top billing was given to some approximately twenty people who were from S.O.S., Save Our State, who handed in fake tax returns suggesting that higher taxation would result in fewer essential state programs and their related jobs being cut.  After that, it was mentioned that a larger group were there holding a “so-called Tea Party.”  At the website, one of these activities was reported, and it wasn’t the one represented by several hundreds.

Here is my email to VPR:

Is there even an article on the Tea Party protest in Montpelier on this site?  I noticed that in your mention on the radio today, you, as did the Burlington Free Press:
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20090416/NEWS03/90416002/-1/NEWS05
gave top billing to the twenty or so people there wanting to Save Our State through more taxation, when there were several hundreds protesting the increase in taxation.  Is this objective journalism?  You people should be ashamed, but I’m sure you’re not.

Just who is it you’re chartered to serve?

You’d think that the immediacy of such a rally might be well conveyed by radio, transmitting the sounds and the thoughts of the participants, but you’d be wrong, apparently.  I’m sorry to use up space here complaining about VPR–revelations that will hardly shock anyone reading this–but I’d just like to say that I will do my best not to patronize any of their underwriters, just because VPR sucks.

VPR explains:

Good morning, Mr. Collins:

Thank you for your note and I’m sorry you were disappointed in our report this morning.

Just to give you some background, we often rely on The Associated Press to supplement our own reports. The story you referred to was based on material we received from the AP. Unfortunately, there was no mention in that story about people who opposed raising taxes.

A producer here recognized the omission and gathered enough material to make clear that there were two different points of view expressed at the Statehouse yesterday. Also, we had a separate report about a similar rally at the New Hampshire Statehouse.

We strive for balance in our reporting and made every effort on a tight deadline to do that this morning.

Thanks again for being in touch, and thanks for listening.

Ross Sneyd

Well, that explains it!  VPR is located in Colchester, VT, less than an hour’s drive from the State Capitol in Montpelier, where later in the day the Legislature passed the funding bill.

Via happyfeet in the comments, WE’RE NUMBER ONE!

35 Replies to “Dirty Socialist Vermont Public Radio [Dan Collins]”

  1. happyfeet says:

    oh. The dirty socialist media must have coordinated the message sate-wide.

  2. I dunno, Dan. It seems like you’re listening to Public Radio all wrong, expecting it to describe the universe we actually live in. I think you’re supposed to take it as fantasy, like reports from a hyper-douchey alternative universe where socialism works and everyone is a pretentious twat.

  3. happyfeet says:

    oh. Oops. We had no idea the dirty socialist Associated Press propaganda might could be misleading. But you have to admit it’s all rather clever, no?

  4. Slartibartfast says:

    WE’RE NUMBER ONE!

    I feel like number two, frankly.

  5. Abe Froman says:

    It was very nice of Ross Sneyd to get back to you with a sincere explanation.

  6. Silver Whistle says:

    It’s almost like VPR are in training to work for the BBC:

    It has always been a day on which a degree of resentment against the government bubbles to the surface.

    *

  7. Good morning, Mr. Collins: The AP ate our homework.

    Fixed that for you.

  8. BJT-FREE! says:

    My Reply to their reply: TOOLS!!

    No, no, I keed. Real inspired reply below…

    Dear NPR:

    Thank you for taking the time to respond to my note. I don’t confess to being a professional journalist so I have a few questions. Why was it necessary to rely on an AP report in determining the lead for this story when your office sits one hour from the site of the protest? Why, after a producer recognized that a much larger local story existed, was the Tea Tax item reported second page to the 20 people showing up at a state office?

    Finally, does this reflect a simple editing error in the face of deadlines or a searing reflection of your partisan toolery?

    Thanks very much for your consideration of my questions. Have a climate cooling diverse day!

    Happyfeet, please feel free to craft your version of the NPR response to my questions … or Dan or anybody else.

  9. Roland THTG says:

    Also, we had a separate report about a similar rally at the New Hampshire Statehouse.

    Oh, they heard some rumors about some goings-on, eh?

  10. Mr. Pink says:

    Dear NPR.

    (hocks a loogie on the letter)

    Thank you for your consideration

  11. Benedick says:

    Meanwhile, Tea Party Participants beware:

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30238492/

    “WASHINGTON – The National Security Agency intercepted private e-mail messages and phone calls of Americans in recent months on a scale that went beyond the broad legal limits established by Congress last year, government officials said in recent interviews.

    “Several intelligence officials, as well as lawyers briefed about the matter, said the N.S.A. had been engaged in “overcollection” of domestic communications of Americans.”

  12. JSchuler says:

    Ignoring the partisan or editorial issues of this incident, this still raises a huge question: What is the value of a public station that simply parrots what is already pervasive in privately-owned media, namely, AP reports? Why are the people of Vermont forced to pay for that which they already have?

  13. Dan Collins says:

    Thanks, Abe, that is something I did not know.

    And Silver Whistle, I find it difficult to believe that an Irishman would write such a thing. I theorize that it must have been an Irishization of the common Sicilian surname, Cannoli.

  14. Kevin B says:

    And all of those people who attended a tea party will have phoned and e-mailed and texted and twittered and talked to their neighbors and family and friends and their workmates, and swapped photos and impressions of their day.

    And all of those people – those that attended and those that only heard about it – will watch their TVs and read their newspapers and go “WTF!”

    This isn’t like the MSM bias in Iraq or even in Washington. This happened just down the road. They were there, or their friends or family were. They think this is important and the gatekeepers think it’s only worthy of a few childish dirty jokes.

    The MSM have really screwed the pooch this time.

  15. happyfeet says:

    oh. Hey BJ. I got diustracted by that dirty socialist newspaper Dan linked. Check it…

    Allows ANR (Agency of Natural Resources) on its own or at the request of a citizen to protect unmapped wetlands as they are identified in the field*

    ok so much for property rights and then there’s this wackyness…

    The Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department is helping private landowners manage and enhance Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) habitat on their lands by providing federal funding through the Landowner Incentive Program, Fish & Wildlife officials said this week.

    […]

    Vermont Fish & Wildlife has committed LIP funds to reimburse landowners up to 75 percent of the cost of hiring a consulting forester to draft a forest management plan that applies these guidelines. A list of foresters trained to apply these guidelines will be provided to the landowner, and a department biologist will work directly with the landowner and consulting forester to tailor the forest management plan to the property.

    Vermont is gay.

  16. happyfeet says:

    oh. link for the bat one.

  17. happyfeet says:

    *distracted* that should be… now I’m trying to decipher this nonsense…

    Burlington Permaculture’s recent workshops on converting lawns to vegetable gardens, backyard mushroom production and liberation ecology — the intersection of social justice and environmental sustainability — have been packed, Krawczyk said, with people interested in making small, positive changes in their environment.

    liberation ecology and backyard mushroom protection

  18. Jim Ryan says:

    To borrow a phrase from Insty: They’re not journalists. They’re just on the other side.

  19. happyfeet says:

    oh… *production* I meant – I’m distracted all around this morning…

  20. Silver Whistle says:

    Dan,

    That was so typical of the Beeb’s output – if you have a strong stomach, click some of the related articles on that linked page. Slobbering man-love. Now there’s a name for a non-Outlaw! band.

  21. SarahW says:

    Balance requires making the little protest as important as the big one. In fact that big protest is “oppressive” to little protests, and ought to be ashamed.

  22. happyfeet says:

    … but this in that last story is what has dazzled me…

    Maeck went so far as to say that individuals should scrap the traditional investment model because it’s based on debt, not equity, and because it is ultimately unhealthy for our communities. One need only look at the recent financial meltdown to see why this is necessary, Maeck said.

    “When we invest in the stock market, we invest in companies that extract from local communities,” Maeck said. “When we invest in local communities, we’re investing in our kids, our families, our businesses.”

    Vermont is seriously flaky.

  23. Silver Whistle says:

    Cannoli – heh! Nice one.

  24. maggie katzen says:

    There aren’t any publicly held corporations in VT?

  25. Jeff G. says:

    @23 Heh.

    In all caps, no less: HEH!

  26. thor says:

    A terse missive, indeed!

    And a shockingly guarded reply!

    Best efforts, all apologies, now deal, in summary.

    Click and Clack’s response would’a been funnier.

  27. geoffb says:

    “When we invest in local communities”

    Ever since Clinton in 1992 this has been newspeak for tax and spend. He started the whole, government “invests” taxes when they spend the money. Obama is the biggest “investor” ever. Just don’t ask about ROI.

  28. BJT-FREE! says:

    Liberation Ecology? WTF?

    Later on the communities will have their “Liberation Kudzu Day” for the bunnies. Next week will be the the once a year “Liberation Soap and Trim.” Ivory only, please!

    Sorry, Dan, but this is about as big a disincentive to moving to Vermont as I can conceive. After all I might move next to one of these unicorn feeding empty headed socialist ideologue nabobs!

    Well … unless I was armed, of course.

  29. poppa india says:

    Dan, I hope you didn’t expect VPR reporters to go outside on a day when rednecks, racists, gun owners, and non-moderates were walking around. They’d be exposed to the great unwashed! Think of their children!
    !

  30. kasper says:

    My beloved state of Vermont, where I was born in brought up … when I go back to visit, despite its beauty, it get sad. I recognize it as home and I know you can never really go home. But this is different. It’s like watching a visually lovely movie that has a creepy dreamy feeling to it.

    Of course, I can’t say where I live now is not headed in the same direction — New Hampshire.

    Anyway, it is good to hear there was something happening in Vermont yesterday.

  31. Cowboy says:

    The Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department is helping private landowners manage and enhance Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) habitat on their lands

    Hey, Vermont, give us back our damned bats!

  32. PR says:

    I did a Google search on some of the roughly 250 people who signed the SOS Tax Hiker Rally petition. Not shockingly, the vast majority of them were government employees or in academia, people whose income relies on your taxes. In other words, THEY WERE MOTIVATED BY PERSONAL GREED. I’m guessing not a single one of them paid excess taxes even though they are permitted to.

  33. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    A list of foresters trained to apply these guidelines

    Read: hippies.

    a department biologist

    Read: fascist bureaucrat.

Comments are closed.