Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

a haiku that — for no reason whatsoever — imagines Calvin Coolidge as a member of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright's congregration

“Don’t expect to build
up the weak by pulling down
the strong. ‘Less they’re white.”

78 Replies to “a haiku that — for no reason whatsoever — imagines Calvin Coolidge as a member of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright's congregration”

  1. Jeff G. says:

    RADICAL CHIC-APHILE-IST!

  2. Pablo says:

    Remember when we did this before and he was called Ward Churchill?

  3. nishizonoshinji says:

    Wow..haiku even.
    You really are back.

  4. BJTexs TW/BP says:

    “Persistance has it’s
    place in racial politics.
    But Wright; just shut up!”

  5. Jeff,

    Not even you can parody Wright. It’s impossible to tell what is a real quote.

  6. alppugreeno says:

    That’s not what I said
    What I really meant to say
    was that shit I said

  7. ushie says:

    I will not vote for Obama because

    he’s a douchebag.

    He’s a big bag of douche.

    He’s a suitful of Summer’s Eve.

    After Michelle hugs him

    she smells like a field of wildflowers

    after a fresh spring rain.

  8. Jeffersonian says:

    This is so left-brain.

  9. candace says:

    Gary Younge The Guardian, Monday April 28 2008
    Article history

    This article appeared in the Guardian on Monday April 28 2008 on p29 of the Comment & debate section. It was last updated at 00:03 on April 28 2008.

    It is one of the enduring paradoxes of American racism that those black Americans most likely to exercise their full rights as citizens – to vote, to stand, to speak out – are the most likely to be branded as unpatriotic.

    “Of course the fact that a person believes in racial equality doesn’t prove that he’s a communist,” said the chairman of a loyalty review board, one of the McCarthyite kangaroo courts that sat in judgment of possible communists, in the 50s. “But it certainly makes you look twice, doesn’t it? You can’t get away from the fact that racial equality is part of the communist line.”

    Assuming that African-Americans could not possibly work out that white supremacy was not in their interests by themselves, their detractors routinely accused them of acting under influences both foreign and malign. The FBI wasted millions of dollars and hours trying in vain to prove that Martin Luther King was a communist. For those who would not know their place and were not assassinated, the punishment was often the revocation of whatever rights of citizenship they had. Already denied the vote, freedom of movement and association, Paul Robeson was refused a passport in 1950 and confined to the US. When his lawyers asked why, they were told that “his frequent criticism of the treatment of blacks in the United States should not be aired in foreign countries”. In 1963 the intellectual and activist WEB Dubois was similarly grounded without passport privileges and so moved to the recently liberated Ghana.

    The struggle for racial equality in America has always essentially been a battle for full citizenship. In a country founded on the principles of the enlightenment and built on the backs of slaves, it has long exposed the tension between the country’s promise and its practice. The founding fathers held both that all men were equal – and that a slave was worth three-fifths of a man. Sooner or later, the nation would implode under the weight of these constitutional contradictions.

    It took the best part of 200 years for the law to catch up. In Barack Obama’s candidacy we are now learning how far America’s political culture has come in this regard and how far it still has to go. Because, for all the misty-eyed liberal talk of him ushering in a post-racial era, the past few weeks have seen Obama fighting not just for the nomination but for his patriotic legitimacy. Constantly questioning his national loyalty and obfuscating his religious affiliation, both the media and his opponents have sought to cast him not only as anti-American but un-American and at times even non-American. His bid to transcend race appears to be crashing on the rocks of racism.

    “Race is intertwined with a broader notion that he is not one of us,” Andrew Kohut, director of the Pew Research Centre, told the New York Times. Pew conducted an extensive examination of voter attitudes, particularly among Democrats who have an unfavourable view of Obama. “They react negatively to people who are seen as different.”

    The point here is not whether white people are prepared to vote for him. First, they clearly are. Of the 10 whitest states to have voted so far, Obama has won nine. And there are countless reasons why people don’t back him that have nothing to do with race – not least that they prefer another candidate on their merits.

    At issue is the insidious and racist manner in which his candidacy is now being framed as that of a nefarious, foreign interloper whose allegiance to his country is inherently inauthentic and instinctively suspect.

    Some of these charges have long emerged from familiar and predictable places. As early as last year, Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News falsely claimed that he had attended an Islamist madrasa while a young boy in Indonesia. When rightwing radio hosts refer to him they generally emphasise and repeat his middle name – Hussein – even though Obama rarely uses it.

    But soon these attacks shifted from the political margins to the mainstream. During the recent ABC debate, Obama was grilled about his refusal to wear an American flag tiepin. One of the moderators asked Obama of his former pastor, Jeremiah Wright: “You do believe he’s as patriotic as you are?”

    Having given up on the African-American vote, the Clintons have clearly decided that it makes more electoral sense to collude with these attacks than it does to raise the tenor of the discussion and challenge them. During the ABC debate, Hillary applauded the line of questioning. “You know, these are problems, I think these are issues that are legitimate and should be explored.”

    Being foreign, Muslim or unpatriotic should not be treated as slurs. But in a post 9/11 framework, the Clintons know full well how these allusions will be understood and what the consequences might be. When asked whether Obama was a Muslim, Hillary said that he wasn’t: “There is nothing to base that on – as far as I know.”

    Three days after Obama made his landmark speech on race, Bill Clinton said of a potential match-up between Hillary Clinton and McCain: “I think it would be a great thing if we had an election year where you had two people who loved this country and were devoted to the interest of this country. And people could actually ask themselves who is right on these issues, instead of all this other stuff that always seems to intrude itself on our politics.” The implication was that Obama doesn’t love his country and all this “racial” stuff is just getting in the way.

    All this does have an effect. By February, 80% of Americans had heard rumours that Obama was Muslim. Even after the furore over the Rev Wright, one in 10 Democrats still believed this. A recent Pew poll showed that the only character trait on which Obama loses to Clinton is patriotism. Exit polls in Pennsylvania revealed that 18% of Democrats said that race mattered to them in this contest – and just 63% of them said that they would support Obama in a general election.

    Unable to beat Obama on delegates and still unlikely to beat him in the popular vote, Hillary Clinton has just one strategy left – to persuade superdelegates that Obama is unelectable. She has tried branding him as inexperienced and slick-tongued, and neither of those have worked. At this stage she has just one argument left: his race. For several months now, her aides have been whispering to whoever would listen that America would never elect a black candidate. In desperation, some are now raising their voices.

    But their accusations are not only cynical – by most accounts they also seem to be wrong. It seems they have underestimated the potential of the American electorate. Polls show that in the states won with less than a five-point margin in 2004 Obama does far better than Clinton against McCain.

    The problem is not that Hillary Clinton is still in the race. She has every right to be. It is that she is running the kind of race that she is. Having failed to convince voters of the viability of her own candidacy, she is now committed to proving the unviability of his.

    Hillary once said it takes a village to raise a child. Now she seems determined to destroy the village in order to save it.

    g.younge@guardian.co.uk

  10. candace says:

    Enjoy!

  11. JohnAnnArbor says:

    If Obama becomes President, he’ll be the most racist since Wilson.

  12. candace says:

    johnannarbor
    bless ya heart!

  13. JD says:

    candace really is a piece of work. I denounce BJ, just in case.

  14. Rob Crawford says:

    Yes, I always look to The Guardian to inform me of race relations in the country I’ve lived in all my life. After all, the Brits have done such a wonderful job themselves — look at all the minority PMs they’ve had!

  15. JohnAnnArbor says:

    Hey candace, if 90% of a particular race vote for a candidate of that race (when a candidate of another race is available), is that racism?

    Does it matter which races are involved? If so, why? And when will it no longer matter?

  16. Slartibartfast says:

    No fair asking questions that are RACIST, John.

  17. Merovign says:

    But but but that Wright quote is out of context!
    (Context of passage even worse than quote)
    But but but that passage is out of context!
    (Entire sermon even worse than passage)
    But but but that sermon is out of context!
    (Body of work presented, even worse than sermon)



    RACIST!!!!

    I think the left is hoping that if they grow more tiresome every day, eventually everyone else will collapse from exhaustion.

  18. BJTexs TW/BP says:

    candace chooses The Guardian to make a definitive statement about racism in America:

    […]

    BWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    Good one, candace. *wipes tears*

    candace is jest a gonna try an edumacate us’n oppresive white folk as to our historical guilt bah associationz.

    I condemn Jeff just so that, you know, you’d feel a part of the crew.

  19. Carin- says:

    Obama is like
    the rain that falls overhead
    honkies can pound sand

  20. Bill Cosby says:

    Go fuck yourself, Candace.

  21. Jeff G. says:

    It’s sad when an editor can’t even recognize it best to scrap a story after noting that it’s very first sentence is idiotic:

    It is one of the enduring paradoxes of American racism that those black Americans most likely to exercise their full rights as citizens – to vote, to stand, to speak out – are the most likely to be branded as unpatriotic.

    Actually, the ones most likely to be “branded” (CODE WORK ALERT!) unpatriotic are the ones who, you know, accuse their country of engaging in a sub rosa, intentional genocide of Blacks by way of retrovirus. And of course, screaming “God Damn America” and embracing a Marxist worldview in a society built on individualism doesn’t help much, either.

    But please. Do remind us again of your degrees. So we can tremble before you and cease with our racist rejoinders.

  22. Slartibartfast says:

    candace chooses The Guardian to make a definitive statement about racism in America

    That’s “Grauniad”. Get it right next time. We could go full anagram and rename it “Dung Aria” or “Aura Ding”, but then no one would get it.

  23. TaiChiWawa says:

    In April’s dark sky –
    Jeremiah hurls thunder.
    Claps forcing shudders.

  24. Carin- says:

    Most important paragraph in Candy’s (can I call you Candy? ) cut-n-paste:

    The point here is not whether white people are prepared to vote for him. First, they clearly are. Of the 10 whitest states to have voted so far, Obama has won nine. And there are countless reasons why people don’t back him that have nothing to do with race – not least that they prefer another candidate on their merits.

    And then the piece goes on to explain how HILLARY is stocking racism fires. Larger society? Not racist? Hillary? Using anything she can. Candy, I think you need to bring this shit up with Hillary supporters. While we have an Obama supporter (or two or three), I don’t think anyone here is pulling for Hillary in anything other than a primary.

  25. JohnAnnArbor says:

    I know a guy with a PhD in biology who happens to be black. He works on advancing scientific knowledge and healing sickness.

    Kind of the opposite of Rev. Wright.

  26. Carin- says:

    Eliminate the question mark after “not racist.”

    Or not. Haters.

  27. Slartibartfast says:

    I’m still stunned by “Dung Aria”, so I’m kind of not noticing your punctuation, Carin.

    Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

  28. MC says:

    Reverend Wright say
    God Damn is not God Damn say
    Hootchie Momma say

  29. timmy d says:

    Petatonic scale
    Why must I have two extra notes?
    Petatonic scale.

  30. BJTexs TW/BP says:

    Yup, Jeff, followed by this big slice of objectionist pie:

    At issue is the insidious and racist manner in which his candidacy is now being framed as that of a nefarious, foreign interloper whose allegiance to his country is inherently inauthentic and instinctively suspect.

    We must not listen to the actual words of the candidate, his wife or his spiritual advisor for they represent some manifestation of the inauthentic. Instead we are to turn our countenances towards The Narrative,™ which will define for us the authentic critical thinking with regards to the hopey, changey campaign.

    Any attempt by us “bitter” white people to eschew the canned policy pronouncements, rich in their vagaries and vagueness, and look closer at the person, character warts and all, and The Narrative™ dictates the dropping of the rethorical hammer. Racism assumed by racist history (for our Guardian pimp is quoting from the 1950’s fer cryin’ out loud) cancels the bitter, white inquiry. Our collective guilt should humble us into silence and accept only the angelic, dulcet tones of Obama’s carefully controlled Xanadu tour guide. Pay no attention to all of that stuff behind The Narrative™ curtain. Us gun totin’ Jesus freaks and unrepentant Zionists have no authenticity, past or present, to question a campaign run on ascention. Character, Schmaracter. Just STFU, whitey.

    I hardly ever get inspired to say this in this way but candace: F#ck off and take your race pimping, victimization complex and bogus black studies degrees with you.

  31. Karl says:

    HE’S BACK, BABY!!!
    /Costanza

  32. Karl says:

    …and it only took the toxic combo of Mandy and Jeremiah! Perhaps we should send them a big ol’ Thank-You card.

    Nah.

  33. BJTexs TW/BP says:

    It is one of the enduring paradoxes of American racism that those black Americans most likely to exercise their full rights as citizens – to vote, to stand, to speak out – are the most likely to be branded as unpatriotic.

    Code word alert, as Jeff points out. Even today our “original sin” programmed into the very DNA of our Constitution and racial identity marks our shame. Bow your heads, racists.

    It could have been worse, I suppose. He could have written “…are the most likely to be lashed with the stigma of being unpatriotic.”

    I suppose we sinners should be grateful for that small indulgence.

  34. happyfeet says:

    Mr. Reynolds posted a link to this today. I thought this part was odd.

    But Obama can’t simply coast to the Democratic presidential nomination. By far the least wealthy of the candidates — John McCain is the richest, followed by the Clintons — he’s nonetheless in danger of typecasting himself as an elitist.

    Elitist and rich aren’t synonyms. I for serious doubt candace is rich. But either way, what’s really odd I think is that Baracky is coming off as such an elitist twat given how little he’s accomplished, not really so much with respect to his net worth.

  35. The Thin Man says:

    While we seem to be cutting and pasting – perhaps a little context on Gary Young –

    Memoirs of a Teenage Trot for example.

    a taste….

    “I called the WRP (Workers Revolutionary Party) organiser and received a vicious tongue-lashing.

    “You can’t just piss off to Yorkshire without telling anyone,” he screamed. “Don’t you know that the state are picking people up left, right and centre at a time of crisis like this?” “Like who?” I asked. “Never mind who,” he shouted, and then delivered a stern lecture on party discipline. By this stage I had had enough. The miners were trickling back to work, the revolution was clearly not around the corner and I was sick of grown-ups playing soldiers. The security blanket of intellectual certainty I had felt when I had joined no longer comforted me. Any suggestion that there was more to politics than class struggle – like race and gender – was met with fierce rebuke.”

    And so on and so forth….

  36. mojo says:

    ‘Tis a tale told by an idiot; full of
    sound and fury, signifying nothing…

    But what about this, which just pressed itself (rather cheekily) upon my attention?:

    Hang out our banners on the outward walls;
    The cry is still ‘They come:’ our castle’s strength
    Will laugh a siege to scorn: here let them lie
    Till famine and the ague eat them up:
    Were they not forced with those that should be ours,
    We might have met them dareful, beard to beard,
    And beat them backward home.

  37. Squid says:

    First Minnesota
    Wiped out at Gettysburg. Why?
    Fuckin’ ingrates, all.

  38. Curmudgeon says:

    “our Guardian pimp is quoting from the 1950’s fer cryin’ out loud”

    And not even getting that right either. A little bit of honesty about Paul Robeson –who wept at news of Stalin’s death — is in order.

    Then again, to Guardian readers, that’s as natural as breathing….

  39. Jim in KC says:

    bitter religion
    roost, American chickens
    ev’ryone likes pie

  40. The Thin Man says:

    Clinton and McCain
    Insidious and racist
    Guardian has been

  41. Obstreperous Infidel says:

    I’d suggest an attempt to reason with Candy, but then again, I’m sure that has been attempted dozens of times. So with that being said: Candy, go fuck yourself.

    If Obama’s skin was a darker shade of ebony and his name was Michael Steele and he wasn’t a fucking American (as it is) hating, empty suited wannabe socialist, I’d vote for him. But, as it is…

  42. nishizonoshinji says:

    captain stupid thinks
    the bell curve is pseudoscience
    he is on the left

  43. Jeffersonian says:

    It is one of the enduring paradoxes of American racism that those black Americans most likely to exercise their full rights as citizens – to vote, to stand, to speak out – are the most likely to be branded as unpatriotic.

    I got this far before I rolled my eyes. I went to a lecture given by Colin Powell during the 1990s and he had plenty to say. His talk had me in tears. He might be black, but if you cut him he bleeds red, white and blue. While I have my disagreements with the man, I’d cut out my tongue before I’d call him unpatriotic. Ditto Tom Sowell, Walter Williams, Ward Connerly, Shelby Steele, etc. Ever check their press clippings, Mr. Younge?

    Jeff is right…the problem with Obama, Wright, Cindy McKinney, Maxine Waters, etc. isn’t the black of their skin, it’s the red of their speech. Stop being seditious fucks and we’ll stop pointing it out.

  44. nishizonoshinji says:

    hmm….better

    captain stupid thinks
    the bell curve is pseudoscience
    cuz he’s on the left

  45. nishizonoshinji says:

    why is this a problem with obama again?
    i thot u were talkin about wright.
    :)

    frenzied flailing fails
    slurs and epithets unstuck
    voters shrug and yawn

  46. nishizonoshinji says:

    frenzied flailing fails
    slurs and epithets unstuck
    voters yawn and shrug

    which is better?

  47. nishizonoshinji says:

    oh this is better

    frenzied flailing fails
    slurs and epithets unstuck
    voters yawn and shrug

  48. nishizonoshinji says:

    frenzied flailing fails
    slurs and epithets unstuck
    voters yawn and shrug

    hehe

  49. JohnAnnArbor says:

    You know, with some people, enough’s never enough. A perpetual sense of entitlement, in other words.

  50. nishizonoshinji says:

    hahaha

    im entitled cuz im correct.
    ;)

  51. JD says:

    nishitiot yammers on
    about what nobody knows
    PWers yawn or mock.

  52. rhodan says:

    Ah yes, Garyu Younge, started out with the New Statesman; which ispractically maoist, one of their big draws is John
    Pilger who was muttering about a CIA
    infiltration of the labour party that included Blair, Mendelson, Brown, et al. Yes, Robeson was a Stalinist, part
    of the Comintern strategy was to create
    a ‘black belt’ which would revolt from
    White America. Dubois, not only ended up that way after endorsing Wilson’s Confederate nationalism over Taft & Roosevelt, acting neutral over fascism
    up to 1937; etc; finally endorsing Kwame Nkrumah’s Umoja nationalist hijinks,

    Seriously, some one at the NAACP (fat chance) or the National Press Club should have followed with something like this;
    “Reverend if you really think America, is damned in the eyes of God. because of slavery, poverty, creating the AIDS
    virus,(whic

  53. nishizonoshinji says:

    hehe, yup..that why the threads go over a hunndred even when the Master is out.
    lulz

  54. nishizonoshinji says:

    well….im kinda surprised rev. wright isn’t into numerology and the Wu-Tang Klan.
    he glommed onto all the other crazie black conspiracy theory BS.

  55. Carin- says:

    nish, Candy may be a threat to your ego. That last thread was over 250 last time I looked.

  56. RDub says:

    If this site had one of those nifty “hide this comment” options on a thread where nishi-whatever gets going, the thread would end up about 60% shorter. And 90% more intelligible, but that’s a whole other story.

  57. nishizonoshinji says:

    rawr!
    lulz, im not threatened.
    i dont do that ethnic [greivance] studies shit.

    mathematicians don’t ever even talk to ethnic studies ppl.

    don’t u know the Uni Law of the Hard Sciences, carin?

    biologists speak only to chemists
    chemists only to physicists
    physicists only to mathematicians,
    and mathematicians only to god.

  58. Rob Crawford says:

    And nishi? Only to itself.

  59. MC says:

    the bell curve is pseudoscience = 8. Your science is off again gamer, erm, nishi…

  60. JD says:

    nishitiot flaps her gums
    genocide and bile spew forth
    0bama cums a little

  61. Carin- says:

    National Review (hard copy) has an article for you nish. I will try to throw a bit at you later, but I have to go do a soccer-mom thing right now.

  62. nishizonoshinji says:

    kk
    is this better?

    captain stupid thinks
    bell curve is pseudoscience
    cuz hes on the left

    hehe, wat a maroon!
    he thinks IDT is real science!
    but the Bell Curve is pseudoscience.
    RWS is on the left side of the Bell Curve too i think.
    ;)
    lordy, how bill ardolino usta despise her.

  63. Carin- says:

    You’re not supposed to say it last name, nish.

  64. Carin- says:

    HIS. Didn’t he want to go all privy a while back?

  65. Nan says:

    And Nishi only to her navel

  66. nishizonoshinji says:

    he did?
    i beeen gone.

  67. MC says:

    KK Nishi – now fix your other factual errors.

    This maroon proved you were a few lines of programming. We see you are still running little program.

  68. Cowboy says:

    I just love it when gamera/nishidiot learns a new phrase. How long do you think we’ll be reading “left side of the bell curve”?

    I feel bad for “wedge strategy.”

    So nearly understood, so quickly discarded.

  69. McGehee says:

    Well, remember: before there was “wedge strategy” there was “ESCR.” Which, um…

  70. B Moe says:

    why is this a problem with obama again?
    i thot u were talkin about wright.

    Chickens, nishi.
    BLT Homing Chickens, all the way down.
    :)

  71. MC says:

    McGehee – If that works out, ’tis truly world changin’… though I’m wondering what they’ll call the menses collection stations…

  72. McGehee says:

    Night drops?

  73. Merovign says:

    Hypothesis: Nishi never stays on subject.

    Test: Someone post an article about her kooky transhuman/eugenics, and we’ll see if she talks about something else.

    Then the peer review process begins.

  74. thor says:

    Roosting chicks, you so my homey
    and your speeches, Jeremiah
    inspire this Nation’s cowbell

  75. Spies, Brigands, and Pirates says:

    dysfunctional child
    posting illiterate rant
    we’re not your Daddy.

  76. BJTexs TW/BP says:

    *sigh*

    The FBI’s Threadjacking Division just collapsed upon itself. Again.

  77. PCachu says:

    sad how nishi touts
    hundred-plus thread comments when
    half of them are her

  78. MC says:

    McGehee:

    The fertile window
    passed. Come see McGehee at the
    Eumenori Shed

Comments are closed.