If you go back and listen to liberal law professor Jonathan Turley’s critiques of imperial Executive overreach during his Congressional testimony yesterday, you’ll reach a point wherein he notes that, with respect to the President’s positions on immigration enforcement, he agrees; but yet that doesn’t matter. Because how Obama went about turning his positions into practice violated the Constitution. Or, to put it in a way that may sound familiar,

Poor Michael Barone: he still thinks ObamaCare is about “health care.” It never was. And so the politics of its roll-out, or the strategy for its implementation, based as it was on perhaps rosy predictions of the President’s sonorous rhetorical prowess, is only of ancillary interest. ObamaCare is about wealth redistribution. As Obama has now said explicitly, and as Donald Berwick noted publicly long ago, which didn’t stop Obama from

“EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson Tells Congress ‘No Proven Cases Where Fracking Has Affected Water’”. Matt Damon hardest hit. (h/t Ezra Levant)

— Which in turn must have Rick Moran — who excoriated we Visigoths for calling such a mindset Marxist — rushing to Wikipedia to find out how “wealth redistribution” by force of government dictate differs significantly from socialism or even communism, save for the obvious fact that those who promote it have no desire to reach that final phase of the worker’s utopia, where the government fades away and all

Despite the settled science and all, which is a check on “complete frauds,” apparently.  Besides, what does this so-called data — dry, uncaring, oblivious to emotionalism and anecdotal implication as it is — have to do with the moral rectitude of protecting this glorious orb from the inhabitants who evolved upon it, like parasites, as a way to kill it off with their noxious exhalation? Answer:  nothing. The fact of